Cargando…
Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
OBJECTIVES: The incidence of cervical cancer is up to 20-fold higher among First Nations women in Canada than the general population, probably due to lower participation in screening. Offering human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in place of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing may eventually increase scr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27855089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011754 |
_version_ | 1782461584386293760 |
---|---|
author | Zehbe, Ingeborg Jackson, Robert Wood, Brianne Weaver, Bruce Escott, Nicholas Severini, Alberto Krajden, Mel Bishop, Lisa Morrisseau, Kyla Ogilvie, Gina Burchell, Ann N Little, Julian |
author_facet | Zehbe, Ingeborg Jackson, Robert Wood, Brianne Weaver, Bruce Escott, Nicholas Severini, Alberto Krajden, Mel Bishop, Lisa Morrisseau, Kyla Ogilvie, Gina Burchell, Ann N Little, Julian |
author_sort | Zehbe, Ingeborg |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The incidence of cervical cancer is up to 20-fold higher among First Nations women in Canada than the general population, probably due to lower participation in screening. Offering human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in place of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing may eventually increase screening participation and reduce cervical cancer rates in this population. DESIGN: A community-randomised controlled screening trial. SETTING: First Nations communities in Northwest Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged between 25 and 69, living in Robinson Superior Treaty First Nations. The community was the unit of randomisation. INTERVENTIONS: Women were asked to complete a questionnaire and have screening by HPV self-sampling (arm A) or Pap testing (arm B). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of women who participated in cervical screening. RANDOMISATION: Community clusters were randomised to include approximately equivalent numbers of women in each arm. RESULTS: 6 communities were randomised to arm A and 5 to arm B. One community withdrew, leaving 5 communities in each group (834 eligible women). Participation was <25%. Using clustered intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, initial and cumulative averaged uptakes in arm A were 1.4-fold (20% vs 14.3%, p=0.628) and 1.3-fold (20.6% vs 16%, p=0.694) higher compared to arm B, respectively. Corresponding per protocol (PP) analysis indicates 2.2-fold (22.9% vs 10.6%, p=0.305) and 1.6-fold (22.9% vs 14.1%, p=0.448) higher uptakes in arm A compared to arm B. Screening uptake varied between communities (range 0–62.1%). Among women who completed a questionnaire (18.3% in arm A, 21.7% in arm B), the screening uptake was 1.8-fold (ITT; p=0.1132) or 3-fold (PP; p<0.01) higher in arm A versus arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Pap and HPV self-sampling were compared in a marginalised, Canadian population. Results indicated a preference for self-sampling. More research on how to reach underscreened Indigenous women is necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN84617261. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5073481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50734812016-11-07 Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology Zehbe, Ingeborg Jackson, Robert Wood, Brianne Weaver, Bruce Escott, Nicholas Severini, Alberto Krajden, Mel Bishop, Lisa Morrisseau, Kyla Ogilvie, Gina Burchell, Ann N Little, Julian BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: The incidence of cervical cancer is up to 20-fold higher among First Nations women in Canada than the general population, probably due to lower participation in screening. Offering human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in place of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing may eventually increase screening participation and reduce cervical cancer rates in this population. DESIGN: A community-randomised controlled screening trial. SETTING: First Nations communities in Northwest Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged between 25 and 69, living in Robinson Superior Treaty First Nations. The community was the unit of randomisation. INTERVENTIONS: Women were asked to complete a questionnaire and have screening by HPV self-sampling (arm A) or Pap testing (arm B). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of women who participated in cervical screening. RANDOMISATION: Community clusters were randomised to include approximately equivalent numbers of women in each arm. RESULTS: 6 communities were randomised to arm A and 5 to arm B. One community withdrew, leaving 5 communities in each group (834 eligible women). Participation was <25%. Using clustered intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, initial and cumulative averaged uptakes in arm A were 1.4-fold (20% vs 14.3%, p=0.628) and 1.3-fold (20.6% vs 16%, p=0.694) higher compared to arm B, respectively. Corresponding per protocol (PP) analysis indicates 2.2-fold (22.9% vs 10.6%, p=0.305) and 1.6-fold (22.9% vs 14.1%, p=0.448) higher uptakes in arm A compared to arm B. Screening uptake varied between communities (range 0–62.1%). Among women who completed a questionnaire (18.3% in arm A, 21.7% in arm B), the screening uptake was 1.8-fold (ITT; p=0.1132) or 3-fold (PP; p<0.01) higher in arm A versus arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Pap and HPV self-sampling were compared in a marginalised, Canadian population. Results indicated a preference for self-sampling. More research on how to reach underscreened Indigenous women is necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN84617261. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5073481/ /pubmed/27855089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011754 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Public Health Zehbe, Ingeborg Jackson, Robert Wood, Brianne Weaver, Bruce Escott, Nicholas Severini, Alberto Krajden, Mel Bishop, Lisa Morrisseau, Kyla Ogilvie, Gina Burchell, Ann N Little, Julian Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology |
title | Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology |
title_full | Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology |
title_fullStr | Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology |
title_full_unstemmed | Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology |
title_short | Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology |
title_sort | community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the anishinaabek cervical cancer screening study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus papanicolaou cytology |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27855089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011754 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zehbeingeborg communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology AT jacksonrobert communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology AT woodbrianne communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology AT weaverbruce communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology AT escottnicholas communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology AT severinialberto communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology AT krajdenmel communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology AT bishoplisa communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology AT morrisseaukyla communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology AT ogilviegina communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology AT burchellannn communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology AT littlejulian communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology |