Cargando…

Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of cervical cancer is up to 20-fold higher among First Nations women in Canada than the general population, probably due to lower participation in screening. Offering human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in place of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing may eventually increase scr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zehbe, Ingeborg, Jackson, Robert, Wood, Brianne, Weaver, Bruce, Escott, Nicholas, Severini, Alberto, Krajden, Mel, Bishop, Lisa, Morrisseau, Kyla, Ogilvie, Gina, Burchell, Ann N, Little, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27855089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011754
_version_ 1782461584386293760
author Zehbe, Ingeborg
Jackson, Robert
Wood, Brianne
Weaver, Bruce
Escott, Nicholas
Severini, Alberto
Krajden, Mel
Bishop, Lisa
Morrisseau, Kyla
Ogilvie, Gina
Burchell, Ann N
Little, Julian
author_facet Zehbe, Ingeborg
Jackson, Robert
Wood, Brianne
Weaver, Bruce
Escott, Nicholas
Severini, Alberto
Krajden, Mel
Bishop, Lisa
Morrisseau, Kyla
Ogilvie, Gina
Burchell, Ann N
Little, Julian
author_sort Zehbe, Ingeborg
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The incidence of cervical cancer is up to 20-fold higher among First Nations women in Canada than the general population, probably due to lower participation in screening. Offering human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in place of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing may eventually increase screening participation and reduce cervical cancer rates in this population. DESIGN: A community-randomised controlled screening trial. SETTING: First Nations communities in Northwest Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged between 25 and 69, living in Robinson Superior Treaty First Nations. The community was the unit of randomisation. INTERVENTIONS: Women were asked to complete a questionnaire and have screening by HPV self-sampling (arm A) or Pap testing (arm B). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of women who participated in cervical screening. RANDOMISATION: Community clusters were randomised to include approximately equivalent numbers of women in each arm. RESULTS: 6 communities were randomised to arm A and 5 to arm B. One community withdrew, leaving 5 communities in each group (834 eligible women). Participation was <25%. Using clustered intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, initial and cumulative averaged uptakes in arm A were 1.4-fold (20% vs 14.3%, p=0.628) and 1.3-fold (20.6% vs 16%, p=0.694) higher compared to arm B, respectively. Corresponding per protocol (PP) analysis indicates 2.2-fold (22.9% vs 10.6%, p=0.305) and 1.6-fold (22.9% vs 14.1%, p=0.448) higher uptakes in arm A compared to arm B. Screening uptake varied between communities (range 0–62.1%). Among women who completed a questionnaire (18.3% in arm A, 21.7% in arm B), the screening uptake was 1.8-fold (ITT; p=0.1132) or 3-fold (PP; p<0.01) higher in arm A versus arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Pap and HPV self-sampling were compared in a marginalised, Canadian population. Results indicated a preference for self-sampling. More research on how to reach underscreened Indigenous women is necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN84617261.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5073481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50734812016-11-07 Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology Zehbe, Ingeborg Jackson, Robert Wood, Brianne Weaver, Bruce Escott, Nicholas Severini, Alberto Krajden, Mel Bishop, Lisa Morrisseau, Kyla Ogilvie, Gina Burchell, Ann N Little, Julian BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: The incidence of cervical cancer is up to 20-fold higher among First Nations women in Canada than the general population, probably due to lower participation in screening. Offering human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in place of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing may eventually increase screening participation and reduce cervical cancer rates in this population. DESIGN: A community-randomised controlled screening trial. SETTING: First Nations communities in Northwest Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged between 25 and 69, living in Robinson Superior Treaty First Nations. The community was the unit of randomisation. INTERVENTIONS: Women were asked to complete a questionnaire and have screening by HPV self-sampling (arm A) or Pap testing (arm B). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of women who participated in cervical screening. RANDOMISATION: Community clusters were randomised to include approximately equivalent numbers of women in each arm. RESULTS: 6 communities were randomised to arm A and 5 to arm B. One community withdrew, leaving 5 communities in each group (834 eligible women). Participation was <25%. Using clustered intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, initial and cumulative averaged uptakes in arm A were 1.4-fold (20% vs 14.3%, p=0.628) and 1.3-fold (20.6% vs 16%, p=0.694) higher compared to arm B, respectively. Corresponding per protocol (PP) analysis indicates 2.2-fold (22.9% vs 10.6%, p=0.305) and 1.6-fold (22.9% vs 14.1%, p=0.448) higher uptakes in arm A compared to arm B. Screening uptake varied between communities (range 0–62.1%). Among women who completed a questionnaire (18.3% in arm A, 21.7% in arm B), the screening uptake was 1.8-fold (ITT; p=0.1132) or 3-fold (PP; p<0.01) higher in arm A versus arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Pap and HPV self-sampling were compared in a marginalised, Canadian population. Results indicated a preference for self-sampling. More research on how to reach underscreened Indigenous women is necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN84617261. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5073481/ /pubmed/27855089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011754 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Zehbe, Ingeborg
Jackson, Robert
Wood, Brianne
Weaver, Bruce
Escott, Nicholas
Severini, Alberto
Krajden, Mel
Bishop, Lisa
Morrisseau, Kyla
Ogilvie, Gina
Burchell, Ann N
Little, Julian
Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
title Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
title_full Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
title_fullStr Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
title_full_unstemmed Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
title_short Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
title_sort community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the anishinaabek cervical cancer screening study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus papanicolaou cytology
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27855089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011754
work_keys_str_mv AT zehbeingeborg communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology
AT jacksonrobert communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology
AT woodbrianne communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology
AT weaverbruce communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology
AT escottnicholas communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology
AT severinialberto communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology
AT krajdenmel communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology
AT bishoplisa communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology
AT morrisseaukyla communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology
AT ogilviegina communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology
AT burchellannn communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology
AT littlejulian communityrandomisedcontrolledtrialembeddedintheanishinaabekcervicalcancerscreeningstudyhumanpapillomavirusselfsamplingversuspapanicolaoucytology