Cargando…

Effect of characteristics of women on attendance in blind and non-blind randomised trials: analysis of recruitment data from the EPHT Trial

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the effect of women's characteristics on their willingness to join a blind or a non-blind subtrial or to be excluded by physicians. DESIGN: Primary prevention trial of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). A 2×2, randomised design with a non-blind HT arm or control arm and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veerus, Piret, Fischer, Krista, Hemminki, Elina, Hovi, Sirpa-Liisa, Hakama, Matti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27797984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011099
_version_ 1782461588835401728
author Veerus, Piret
Fischer, Krista
Hemminki, Elina
Hovi, Sirpa-Liisa
Hakama, Matti
author_facet Veerus, Piret
Fischer, Krista
Hemminki, Elina
Hovi, Sirpa-Liisa
Hakama, Matti
author_sort Veerus, Piret
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To analyse the effect of women's characteristics on their willingness to join a blind or a non-blind subtrial or to be excluded by physicians. DESIGN: Primary prevention trial of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). A 2×2, randomised design with a non-blind HT arm or control arm and a blind HT arm or placebo arm. SETTING: 3 clinical centres in Estonia. METHODS: Interest in joining the trial was asked in a questionnaire together with demographic and health status data. Interested and eligible women were invited to a health examination that also informed whether they belonged to a blind or to a non-blind subtrial; the arm was not revealed. Trial physicians made further exclusions when checking the women's eligibility. Thereafter, informed consent was asked as detailed in the flow chart. Comparisons were made between non-blind and blind subtrials. Analyses were carried out for each of the background variables. OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of willingness, eligibility and attendance. RESULTS: Women randomised to the non-blind subtrial were more willing to join (relative risk (RR) 1.17) and more likely to be found eligible by physicians (RR 1.10) than women in the blind subtrial, resulting in larger attendance (RR 1.29). Women with higher education were differentially more willing to join the non-blind trial (RR 1.29) than those with basic education (RR 1.08); the differential willingness of never-smokers (RR 1.20) was larger than that of current smokers (RR 1.07). The differential exclusion by physicians by education and smoking were small. Some subjective symptoms (eg, diarrhoea/constipation, stomach pain) had reverse differential effects on attendance in the non-blind subtrial in comparison to the blind subtrial. Menopausal symptoms did not affect the differential interest, eligibility or attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Blinding in RCT reduces attendance, due to decisions of the women and the trial physicians. Differential attendance by blinding may affect the generalisability of the results from trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN35338757.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5073501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50735012016-11-07 Effect of characteristics of women on attendance in blind and non-blind randomised trials: analysis of recruitment data from the EPHT Trial Veerus, Piret Fischer, Krista Hemminki, Elina Hovi, Sirpa-Liisa Hakama, Matti BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: To analyse the effect of women's characteristics on their willingness to join a blind or a non-blind subtrial or to be excluded by physicians. DESIGN: Primary prevention trial of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). A 2×2, randomised design with a non-blind HT arm or control arm and a blind HT arm or placebo arm. SETTING: 3 clinical centres in Estonia. METHODS: Interest in joining the trial was asked in a questionnaire together with demographic and health status data. Interested and eligible women were invited to a health examination that also informed whether they belonged to a blind or to a non-blind subtrial; the arm was not revealed. Trial physicians made further exclusions when checking the women's eligibility. Thereafter, informed consent was asked as detailed in the flow chart. Comparisons were made between non-blind and blind subtrials. Analyses were carried out for each of the background variables. OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of willingness, eligibility and attendance. RESULTS: Women randomised to the non-blind subtrial were more willing to join (relative risk (RR) 1.17) and more likely to be found eligible by physicians (RR 1.10) than women in the blind subtrial, resulting in larger attendance (RR 1.29). Women with higher education were differentially more willing to join the non-blind trial (RR 1.29) than those with basic education (RR 1.08); the differential willingness of never-smokers (RR 1.20) was larger than that of current smokers (RR 1.07). The differential exclusion by physicians by education and smoking were small. Some subjective symptoms (eg, diarrhoea/constipation, stomach pain) had reverse differential effects on attendance in the non-blind subtrial in comparison to the blind subtrial. Menopausal symptoms did not affect the differential interest, eligibility or attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Blinding in RCT reduces attendance, due to decisions of the women and the trial physicians. Differential attendance by blinding may affect the generalisability of the results from trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN35338757. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5073501/ /pubmed/27797984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011099 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Veerus, Piret
Fischer, Krista
Hemminki, Elina
Hovi, Sirpa-Liisa
Hakama, Matti
Effect of characteristics of women on attendance in blind and non-blind randomised trials: analysis of recruitment data from the EPHT Trial
title Effect of characteristics of women on attendance in blind and non-blind randomised trials: analysis of recruitment data from the EPHT Trial
title_full Effect of characteristics of women on attendance in blind and non-blind randomised trials: analysis of recruitment data from the EPHT Trial
title_fullStr Effect of characteristics of women on attendance in blind and non-blind randomised trials: analysis of recruitment data from the EPHT Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of characteristics of women on attendance in blind and non-blind randomised trials: analysis of recruitment data from the EPHT Trial
title_short Effect of characteristics of women on attendance in blind and non-blind randomised trials: analysis of recruitment data from the EPHT Trial
title_sort effect of characteristics of women on attendance in blind and non-blind randomised trials: analysis of recruitment data from the epht trial
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27797984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011099
work_keys_str_mv AT veeruspiret effectofcharacteristicsofwomenonattendanceinblindandnonblindrandomisedtrialsanalysisofrecruitmentdatafromtheephttrial
AT fischerkrista effectofcharacteristicsofwomenonattendanceinblindandnonblindrandomisedtrialsanalysisofrecruitmentdatafromtheephttrial
AT hemminkielina effectofcharacteristicsofwomenonattendanceinblindandnonblindrandomisedtrialsanalysisofrecruitmentdatafromtheephttrial
AT hovisirpaliisa effectofcharacteristicsofwomenonattendanceinblindandnonblindrandomisedtrialsanalysisofrecruitmentdatafromtheephttrial
AT hakamamatti effectofcharacteristicsofwomenonattendanceinblindandnonblindrandomisedtrialsanalysisofrecruitmentdatafromtheephttrial