Cargando…
Fracture in the Elderly Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation (FEMuR): a phase II randomised feasibility study of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation package following hip fracture
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a rigorous feasibility study for a future definitive parallel-group randomised controlled trial (RCT) and economic evaluation of an enhanced rehabilitation package for hip fracture. SETTING: Recruitment from 3 acute hospitals in North Wales. Intervention delivery in the communi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27707828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012422 |
_version_ | 1782461595091206144 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Nefyn H Roberts, Jessica L Din, Nafees Ud Totton, Nicola Charles, Joanna M Hawkes, Claire A Morrison, Val Hoare, Zoe Williams, Michelle Pritchard, Aaron W Alexander, Swapna Lemmey, Andrew Woods, Robert T Sackley, Catherine Logan, Pip Edwards, Rhiannon T Wilkinson, Clare |
author_facet | Williams, Nefyn H Roberts, Jessica L Din, Nafees Ud Totton, Nicola Charles, Joanna M Hawkes, Claire A Morrison, Val Hoare, Zoe Williams, Michelle Pritchard, Aaron W Alexander, Swapna Lemmey, Andrew Woods, Robert T Sackley, Catherine Logan, Pip Edwards, Rhiannon T Wilkinson, Clare |
author_sort | Williams, Nefyn H |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To conduct a rigorous feasibility study for a future definitive parallel-group randomised controlled trial (RCT) and economic evaluation of an enhanced rehabilitation package for hip fracture. SETTING: Recruitment from 3 acute hospitals in North Wales. Intervention delivery in the community. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (aged ≥65) who received surgical treatment for hip fracture, lived independently prior to fracture, had mental capacity (assessed by clinical team) and received rehabilitation in the North Wales area. INTERVENTION: Remote randomisation to usual care (control) or usual care+enhanced rehabilitation package (intervention), including six additional home-based physiotherapy sessions delivered by a physiotherapist or technical instructor, novel information workbook and goal-setting diary. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: Barthel Activities of Daily Living (BADL). Secondary measures included Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale (NEADL), EQ-5D, ICECAP capability, a suite of self-efficacy, psychosocial and service-use measures and costs. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up by blinded researchers. RESULTS: 62 participants were recruited, 61 randomised (control 32; intervention 29) and 49 (79%) completed 3-month follow-up. Minimal differences occurred between the 2 groups for most outcomes, including BADL (adjusted mean difference 0.5). The intervention group showed a medium-sized improvement in the NEADL relative to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference between groups of 3.0 (Cohen's d 0.63), and a trend for greater improvement in self-efficacy and mental health, but with small effect sizes. The mean cost of delivering the intervention was £231 per patient. There was a small relative improvement in quality-adjusted life year in the intervention group. No serious adverse events relating to the intervention were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The trial methods were feasible in terms of eligibility, recruitment and retention. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the rehabilitation package should be tested in a phase III RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN22464643; Results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5073533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50735332016-11-07 Fracture in the Elderly Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation (FEMuR): a phase II randomised feasibility study of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation package following hip fracture Williams, Nefyn H Roberts, Jessica L Din, Nafees Ud Totton, Nicola Charles, Joanna M Hawkes, Claire A Morrison, Val Hoare, Zoe Williams, Michelle Pritchard, Aaron W Alexander, Swapna Lemmey, Andrew Woods, Robert T Sackley, Catherine Logan, Pip Edwards, Rhiannon T Wilkinson, Clare BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVE: To conduct a rigorous feasibility study for a future definitive parallel-group randomised controlled trial (RCT) and economic evaluation of an enhanced rehabilitation package for hip fracture. SETTING: Recruitment from 3 acute hospitals in North Wales. Intervention delivery in the community. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (aged ≥65) who received surgical treatment for hip fracture, lived independently prior to fracture, had mental capacity (assessed by clinical team) and received rehabilitation in the North Wales area. INTERVENTION: Remote randomisation to usual care (control) or usual care+enhanced rehabilitation package (intervention), including six additional home-based physiotherapy sessions delivered by a physiotherapist or technical instructor, novel information workbook and goal-setting diary. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: Barthel Activities of Daily Living (BADL). Secondary measures included Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale (NEADL), EQ-5D, ICECAP capability, a suite of self-efficacy, psychosocial and service-use measures and costs. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up by blinded researchers. RESULTS: 62 participants were recruited, 61 randomised (control 32; intervention 29) and 49 (79%) completed 3-month follow-up. Minimal differences occurred between the 2 groups for most outcomes, including BADL (adjusted mean difference 0.5). The intervention group showed a medium-sized improvement in the NEADL relative to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference between groups of 3.0 (Cohen's d 0.63), and a trend for greater improvement in self-efficacy and mental health, but with small effect sizes. The mean cost of delivering the intervention was £231 per patient. There was a small relative improvement in quality-adjusted life year in the intervention group. No serious adverse events relating to the intervention were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The trial methods were feasible in terms of eligibility, recruitment and retention. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the rehabilitation package should be tested in a phase III RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN22464643; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5073533/ /pubmed/27707828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012422 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Williams, Nefyn H Roberts, Jessica L Din, Nafees Ud Totton, Nicola Charles, Joanna M Hawkes, Claire A Morrison, Val Hoare, Zoe Williams, Michelle Pritchard, Aaron W Alexander, Swapna Lemmey, Andrew Woods, Robert T Sackley, Catherine Logan, Pip Edwards, Rhiannon T Wilkinson, Clare Fracture in the Elderly Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation (FEMuR): a phase II randomised feasibility study of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation package following hip fracture |
title | Fracture in the Elderly Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation (FEMuR): a phase II randomised feasibility study of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation package following hip fracture |
title_full | Fracture in the Elderly Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation (FEMuR): a phase II randomised feasibility study of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation package following hip fracture |
title_fullStr | Fracture in the Elderly Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation (FEMuR): a phase II randomised feasibility study of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation package following hip fracture |
title_full_unstemmed | Fracture in the Elderly Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation (FEMuR): a phase II randomised feasibility study of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation package following hip fracture |
title_short | Fracture in the Elderly Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation (FEMuR): a phase II randomised feasibility study of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation package following hip fracture |
title_sort | fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation (femur): a phase ii randomised feasibility study of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation package following hip fracture |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27707828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamsnefynh fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT robertsjessical fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT dinnafeesud fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT tottonnicola fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT charlesjoannam fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT hawkesclairea fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT morrisonval fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT hoarezoe fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT williamsmichelle fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT pritchardaaronw fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT alexanderswapna fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT lemmeyandrew fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT woodsrobertt fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT sackleycatherine fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT loganpip fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT edwardsrhiannont fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture AT wilkinsonclare fractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationfemuraphaseiirandomisedfeasibilitystudyofamultidisciplinaryrehabilitationpackagefollowinghipfracture |