Cargando…

Estimating the visibility rate of abortion: a case study of Kerman, Iran

OBJECTIVES: Abortion is a sensitive issue; many cultures disapprove of it, which leads to under-reporting. This study sought to estimate the rate of abortion visibility in the city of Kerman, Iran—that is, the percentage of acquaintances who knew about a particular abortion. For estimating the visib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zamanian, Maryam, Baneshi, Mohammad Reza, Haghdoost, AliAkbar, Zolala, Farzaneh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27737886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012761
_version_ 1782461613239959552
author Zamanian, Maryam
Baneshi, Mohammad Reza
Haghdoost, AliAkbar
Zolala, Farzaneh
author_facet Zamanian, Maryam
Baneshi, Mohammad Reza
Haghdoost, AliAkbar
Zolala, Farzaneh
author_sort Zamanian, Maryam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Abortion is a sensitive issue; many cultures disapprove of it, which leads to under-reporting. This study sought to estimate the rate of abortion visibility in the city of Kerman, Iran—that is, the percentage of acquaintances who knew about a particular abortion. For estimating the visibility rate, it is crucial to use the network scale-up method, which is a new, indirect method of estimating sensitive behaviours more accurately. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Kerman, Iran using various methods to ensure the cooperation of clinicians and women. A total of 222 women who had had an abortion within the previous year (74 elective, 74 medical and 74 spontaneous abortions) were recruited. Participants were asked how many of their acquaintances were aware of their abortion. Abortion visibility was estimated by abortion type. 95% CIs were calculated by a bootstrap procedure. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression analysis was conducted to assess the variables related to visibility. RESULTS: The visibility (95% CI) of elective, medical and spontaneous abortion was 8% (6% to 10%), 60% (54% to 66%) and 50% (43% to 57%), respectively. Women and consanguineal family were more likely to be aware of the abortion than men and affinal family. Non-family members had a low probability of knowing about the abortion, except in elective cases. Abortion type, marital status, sex of the acquaintance and closeness of the relationship were the most important determinants of abortion visibility in the final multifactorial model. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the visibility rate to be low, but it does differ among social network members and by the type of abortion in question. This difference might be explained through social and cultural norms as well as stigma surrounding abortion. The low visibility rate might explain the low estimates of abortion rates found in other studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5073643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50736432016-11-07 Estimating the visibility rate of abortion: a case study of Kerman, Iran Zamanian, Maryam Baneshi, Mohammad Reza Haghdoost, AliAkbar Zolala, Farzaneh BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: Abortion is a sensitive issue; many cultures disapprove of it, which leads to under-reporting. This study sought to estimate the rate of abortion visibility in the city of Kerman, Iran—that is, the percentage of acquaintances who knew about a particular abortion. For estimating the visibility rate, it is crucial to use the network scale-up method, which is a new, indirect method of estimating sensitive behaviours more accurately. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Kerman, Iran using various methods to ensure the cooperation of clinicians and women. A total of 222 women who had had an abortion within the previous year (74 elective, 74 medical and 74 spontaneous abortions) were recruited. Participants were asked how many of their acquaintances were aware of their abortion. Abortion visibility was estimated by abortion type. 95% CIs were calculated by a bootstrap procedure. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression analysis was conducted to assess the variables related to visibility. RESULTS: The visibility (95% CI) of elective, medical and spontaneous abortion was 8% (6% to 10%), 60% (54% to 66%) and 50% (43% to 57%), respectively. Women and consanguineal family were more likely to be aware of the abortion than men and affinal family. Non-family members had a low probability of knowing about the abortion, except in elective cases. Abortion type, marital status, sex of the acquaintance and closeness of the relationship were the most important determinants of abortion visibility in the final multifactorial model. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the visibility rate to be low, but it does differ among social network members and by the type of abortion in question. This difference might be explained through social and cultural norms as well as stigma surrounding abortion. The low visibility rate might explain the low estimates of abortion rates found in other studies. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5073643/ /pubmed/27737886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012761 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Zamanian, Maryam
Baneshi, Mohammad Reza
Haghdoost, AliAkbar
Zolala, Farzaneh
Estimating the visibility rate of abortion: a case study of Kerman, Iran
title Estimating the visibility rate of abortion: a case study of Kerman, Iran
title_full Estimating the visibility rate of abortion: a case study of Kerman, Iran
title_fullStr Estimating the visibility rate of abortion: a case study of Kerman, Iran
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the visibility rate of abortion: a case study of Kerman, Iran
title_short Estimating the visibility rate of abortion: a case study of Kerman, Iran
title_sort estimating the visibility rate of abortion: a case study of kerman, iran
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27737886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012761
work_keys_str_mv AT zamanianmaryam estimatingthevisibilityrateofabortionacasestudyofkermaniran
AT baneshimohammadreza estimatingthevisibilityrateofabortionacasestudyofkermaniran
AT haghdoostaliakbar estimatingthevisibilityrateofabortionacasestudyofkermaniran
AT zolalafarzaneh estimatingthevisibilityrateofabortionacasestudyofkermaniran