Cargando…

Copayment and recommended strategies to mitigate its impacts on access to emergency medical services under universal health coverage: a case study from Thailand

BACKGROUND: Although bodies of evidence on copayment effects on access to care and quality of care in general have not been conclusive, allowing copayment in the case of emergency medical conditions might pose a high risk of delayed treatment leading to avoidable disability or death. METHODS: Using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suriyawongpaisal, Paibul, Aekplakorn, Wichai, Srithamrongsawat, Samrit, Srithongchai, Chaisit, Prasitsiriphon, Orawan, Tansirisithikul, Rassamee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27769256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1847-y
_version_ 1782461620519174144
author Suriyawongpaisal, Paibul
Aekplakorn, Wichai
Srithamrongsawat, Samrit
Srithongchai, Chaisit
Prasitsiriphon, Orawan
Tansirisithikul, Rassamee
author_facet Suriyawongpaisal, Paibul
Aekplakorn, Wichai
Srithamrongsawat, Samrit
Srithongchai, Chaisit
Prasitsiriphon, Orawan
Tansirisithikul, Rassamee
author_sort Suriyawongpaisal, Paibul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although bodies of evidence on copayment effects on access to care and quality of care in general have not been conclusive, allowing copayment in the case of emergency medical conditions might pose a high risk of delayed treatment leading to avoidable disability or death. METHODS: Using mixed-methods approach to draw evidence from multiple sources (over 40,000 records of administrative dataset of Thai emergency medical services, in-depth interviews, telephone survey of users and documentary review), we are were able to shed light on the existence of copayment and its related factors in the Thai healthcare system despite the presence of universal health coverage since 2001. RESULTS: The copayment poses a barrier of access to emergency care delivered by private hospitals despite the policy proclaiming free access and payment. The copayment differentially affects beneficiaries of the major 3 public-health insurance schemes hence inducing inequity of access. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified 6 drivers of the copayment i.e., 1) perceived under payment, 2) unclear operational definitions of emergency conditions or 3) lack of criteria to justify inter-hospital transfer after the first 72 h of admission, 4) limited understanding by the service users of the policy-directed benefits, 5) weak regulatory mechanism as indicated by lack of information systems to trace private provider’s practices, and 6) ineffective arrangements for inter-hospital transfer. With demand-side perspectives, we addressed the reasons for bypassing gatekeepers or assigned local hospitals. These are the perception of inferior quality of care and age-related tendency to use emergency department, which indicate a deficit in the current healthcare systems under universal health coverage. Finally, we have discussed strategies to address these potential drivers of copayment and needs for further studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1847-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5073698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50736982016-10-24 Copayment and recommended strategies to mitigate its impacts on access to emergency medical services under universal health coverage: a case study from Thailand Suriyawongpaisal, Paibul Aekplakorn, Wichai Srithamrongsawat, Samrit Srithongchai, Chaisit Prasitsiriphon, Orawan Tansirisithikul, Rassamee BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Although bodies of evidence on copayment effects on access to care and quality of care in general have not been conclusive, allowing copayment in the case of emergency medical conditions might pose a high risk of delayed treatment leading to avoidable disability or death. METHODS: Using mixed-methods approach to draw evidence from multiple sources (over 40,000 records of administrative dataset of Thai emergency medical services, in-depth interviews, telephone survey of users and documentary review), we are were able to shed light on the existence of copayment and its related factors in the Thai healthcare system despite the presence of universal health coverage since 2001. RESULTS: The copayment poses a barrier of access to emergency care delivered by private hospitals despite the policy proclaiming free access and payment. The copayment differentially affects beneficiaries of the major 3 public-health insurance schemes hence inducing inequity of access. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified 6 drivers of the copayment i.e., 1) perceived under payment, 2) unclear operational definitions of emergency conditions or 3) lack of criteria to justify inter-hospital transfer after the first 72 h of admission, 4) limited understanding by the service users of the policy-directed benefits, 5) weak regulatory mechanism as indicated by lack of information systems to trace private provider’s practices, and 6) ineffective arrangements for inter-hospital transfer. With demand-side perspectives, we addressed the reasons for bypassing gatekeepers or assigned local hospitals. These are the perception of inferior quality of care and age-related tendency to use emergency department, which indicate a deficit in the current healthcare systems under universal health coverage. Finally, we have discussed strategies to address these potential drivers of copayment and needs for further studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1847-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5073698/ /pubmed/27769256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1847-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Suriyawongpaisal, Paibul
Aekplakorn, Wichai
Srithamrongsawat, Samrit
Srithongchai, Chaisit
Prasitsiriphon, Orawan
Tansirisithikul, Rassamee
Copayment and recommended strategies to mitigate its impacts on access to emergency medical services under universal health coverage: a case study from Thailand
title Copayment and recommended strategies to mitigate its impacts on access to emergency medical services under universal health coverage: a case study from Thailand
title_full Copayment and recommended strategies to mitigate its impacts on access to emergency medical services under universal health coverage: a case study from Thailand
title_fullStr Copayment and recommended strategies to mitigate its impacts on access to emergency medical services under universal health coverage: a case study from Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Copayment and recommended strategies to mitigate its impacts on access to emergency medical services under universal health coverage: a case study from Thailand
title_short Copayment and recommended strategies to mitigate its impacts on access to emergency medical services under universal health coverage: a case study from Thailand
title_sort copayment and recommended strategies to mitigate its impacts on access to emergency medical services under universal health coverage: a case study from thailand
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27769256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1847-y
work_keys_str_mv AT suriyawongpaisalpaibul copaymentandrecommendedstrategiestomitigateitsimpactsonaccesstoemergencymedicalservicesunderuniversalhealthcoverageacasestudyfromthailand
AT aekplakornwichai copaymentandrecommendedstrategiestomitigateitsimpactsonaccesstoemergencymedicalservicesunderuniversalhealthcoverageacasestudyfromthailand
AT srithamrongsawatsamrit copaymentandrecommendedstrategiestomitigateitsimpactsonaccesstoemergencymedicalservicesunderuniversalhealthcoverageacasestudyfromthailand
AT srithongchaichaisit copaymentandrecommendedstrategiestomitigateitsimpactsonaccesstoemergencymedicalservicesunderuniversalhealthcoverageacasestudyfromthailand
AT prasitsiriphonorawan copaymentandrecommendedstrategiestomitigateitsimpactsonaccesstoemergencymedicalservicesunderuniversalhealthcoverageacasestudyfromthailand
AT tansirisithikulrassamee copaymentandrecommendedstrategiestomitigateitsimpactsonaccesstoemergencymedicalservicesunderuniversalhealthcoverageacasestudyfromthailand