Cargando…

Effects of clobazam for treatment of refractory status epilepticus

BACKGROUND: Clobazam (CLB) is a well characterized antiepileptic drug (AED) that differs from other benzodiazepines by its basic chemical structure and pharmacodynamic properties. Only one previous study examined the efficacy of CLB as add-on therapy in refractory status epilepticus (RSE). METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madžar, Dominik, Geyer, Anna, Knappe, Ruben U., Gollwitzer, Stephanie, Kuramatsu, Joji B., Gerner, Stefan T., Hamer, Hajo M., Huttner, Hagen B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27769254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0724-y
_version_ 1782461635528491008
author Madžar, Dominik
Geyer, Anna
Knappe, Ruben U.
Gollwitzer, Stephanie
Kuramatsu, Joji B.
Gerner, Stefan T.
Hamer, Hajo M.
Huttner, Hagen B.
author_facet Madžar, Dominik
Geyer, Anna
Knappe, Ruben U.
Gollwitzer, Stephanie
Kuramatsu, Joji B.
Gerner, Stefan T.
Hamer, Hajo M.
Huttner, Hagen B.
author_sort Madžar, Dominik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clobazam (CLB) is a well characterized antiepileptic drug (AED) that differs from other benzodiazepines by its basic chemical structure and pharmacodynamic properties. Only one previous study examined the efficacy of CLB as add-on therapy in refractory status epilepticus (RSE). METHODS: We analyzed RSE episodes treated in our institution between 2001 and 2012. Successful treatment with CLB was scored if CLB was the last AED added to therapy before RSE termination. We assessed the differences between patients with and without CLB and correlated CLB with outcome. Among patients treated with CLB, we studied responders and non-responders and compared our CLB cohort with recently published data. RESULTS: CLB was part of the AED regimen in 24/70 (34.3 %) RSE episodes. In six of these (25.0 %) RSE resolution was attributed to CLB. Baseline characteristics of episodes with and without CLB treatment showed no significant differences and RSE termination rates were very similar (83.3 % vs. 80.4 %). CLB was administered in clinically more complex RSE with longer RSE duration and worse outcome, but CLB was not related independently to outcome. Comparison of our results with previously published data revealed that baseline characteristics as well as CLB maintenance doses and time of treatment initiation were similar in both cohorts. CLB was less frequently the last AED added to RSE therapy in our patients indicating a lower treatment success rate than previously reported. CONCLUSIONS: CLB represents a reasonable AED and promising add-on agent for treatment of RSE. However, rates of successful CLB response were substantially lower than in a recently published study. Differing RSE characteristics and treatment strategies may account for the discrepancy between study results, as RSE etiologies and seizures types associated with unfavorable prognosis were more common in our cohort, while anesthetics tended to be less frequently applied to achieve seizure control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5073816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50738162016-10-26 Effects of clobazam for treatment of refractory status epilepticus Madžar, Dominik Geyer, Anna Knappe, Ruben U. Gollwitzer, Stephanie Kuramatsu, Joji B. Gerner, Stefan T. Hamer, Hajo M. Huttner, Hagen B. BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Clobazam (CLB) is a well characterized antiepileptic drug (AED) that differs from other benzodiazepines by its basic chemical structure and pharmacodynamic properties. Only one previous study examined the efficacy of CLB as add-on therapy in refractory status epilepticus (RSE). METHODS: We analyzed RSE episodes treated in our institution between 2001 and 2012. Successful treatment with CLB was scored if CLB was the last AED added to therapy before RSE termination. We assessed the differences between patients with and without CLB and correlated CLB with outcome. Among patients treated with CLB, we studied responders and non-responders and compared our CLB cohort with recently published data. RESULTS: CLB was part of the AED regimen in 24/70 (34.3 %) RSE episodes. In six of these (25.0 %) RSE resolution was attributed to CLB. Baseline characteristics of episodes with and without CLB treatment showed no significant differences and RSE termination rates were very similar (83.3 % vs. 80.4 %). CLB was administered in clinically more complex RSE with longer RSE duration and worse outcome, but CLB was not related independently to outcome. Comparison of our results with previously published data revealed that baseline characteristics as well as CLB maintenance doses and time of treatment initiation were similar in both cohorts. CLB was less frequently the last AED added to RSE therapy in our patients indicating a lower treatment success rate than previously reported. CONCLUSIONS: CLB represents a reasonable AED and promising add-on agent for treatment of RSE. However, rates of successful CLB response were substantially lower than in a recently published study. Differing RSE characteristics and treatment strategies may account for the discrepancy between study results, as RSE etiologies and seizures types associated with unfavorable prognosis were more common in our cohort, while anesthetics tended to be less frequently applied to achieve seizure control. BioMed Central 2016-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5073816/ /pubmed/27769254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0724-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Madžar, Dominik
Geyer, Anna
Knappe, Ruben U.
Gollwitzer, Stephanie
Kuramatsu, Joji B.
Gerner, Stefan T.
Hamer, Hajo M.
Huttner, Hagen B.
Effects of clobazam for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title Effects of clobazam for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title_full Effects of clobazam for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title_fullStr Effects of clobazam for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title_full_unstemmed Effects of clobazam for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title_short Effects of clobazam for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
title_sort effects of clobazam for treatment of refractory status epilepticus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27769254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0724-y
work_keys_str_mv AT madzardominik effectsofclobazamfortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT geyeranna effectsofclobazamfortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT knapperubenu effectsofclobazamfortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT gollwitzerstephanie effectsofclobazamfortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT kuramatsujojib effectsofclobazamfortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT gernerstefant effectsofclobazamfortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT hamerhajom effectsofclobazamfortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT huttnerhagenb effectsofclobazamfortreatmentofrefractorystatusepilepticus