Cargando…

Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended

BACKGROUND: Assessing primary rehabilitation needs in patients with acquired brain injury is a challenge due to case complexity and the heterogeneity of symptoms after brain injury. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended (RCS-E) is an instrument used in assessment of rehabilitation complexity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maribo, Thomas, Pedersen, Asger R., Jensen, Jim, Nielsen, Jørgen F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27769250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0728-7
_version_ 1782461666603040768
author Maribo, Thomas
Pedersen, Asger R.
Jensen, Jim
Nielsen, Jørgen F.
author_facet Maribo, Thomas
Pedersen, Asger R.
Jensen, Jim
Nielsen, Jørgen F.
author_sort Maribo, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessing primary rehabilitation needs in patients with acquired brain injury is a challenge due to case complexity and the heterogeneity of symptoms after brain injury. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended (RCS-E) is an instrument used in assessment of rehabilitation complexity in patients with severe brain injury. The aim of the present study was to translate and test the face validity of the RCS-E as a referral tool for primary rehabilitation. Face validity was tested in a sample of patients with acquired brain injury. METHODS: Ten clinicians and records from 299 patients with acquired brain injury were used in the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and face validation study of the RCS-E. RCS-E was translated into Danish by a standardized forward-backward translation by experts in the field. Face validity was assessed by a multi-professional team assessing 299 patients. The team was asked their opinion on whether the RCS-E presents a sufficient description of the patients. RESULTS: The RCS-E was translated according to international guidelines and tested by health professionals; some adaptations were required due to linguistic problems and differences in the national health system structures. The patients in the study had a mean age of 63.9 years (SD 14.7); 61 % were male. We found an excellent face validity with a mean score of 8.2 (SD 0.34) assessed on a 0–10 scale. CONCLUSIONS: The RCS-E demonstrated to be a valid assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in patients with acquired brain injury. Excellent face validity indicates that the RCS-E is feasible for assessing primary rehabilitation needs and the present study suggests its applicability to the Danish health care system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0728-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5073960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50739602016-10-27 Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended Maribo, Thomas Pedersen, Asger R. Jensen, Jim Nielsen, Jørgen F. BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessing primary rehabilitation needs in patients with acquired brain injury is a challenge due to case complexity and the heterogeneity of symptoms after brain injury. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended (RCS-E) is an instrument used in assessment of rehabilitation complexity in patients with severe brain injury. The aim of the present study was to translate and test the face validity of the RCS-E as a referral tool for primary rehabilitation. Face validity was tested in a sample of patients with acquired brain injury. METHODS: Ten clinicians and records from 299 patients with acquired brain injury were used in the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and face validation study of the RCS-E. RCS-E was translated into Danish by a standardized forward-backward translation by experts in the field. Face validity was assessed by a multi-professional team assessing 299 patients. The team was asked their opinion on whether the RCS-E presents a sufficient description of the patients. RESULTS: The RCS-E was translated according to international guidelines and tested by health professionals; some adaptations were required due to linguistic problems and differences in the national health system structures. The patients in the study had a mean age of 63.9 years (SD 14.7); 61 % were male. We found an excellent face validity with a mean score of 8.2 (SD 0.34) assessed on a 0–10 scale. CONCLUSIONS: The RCS-E demonstrated to be a valid assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in patients with acquired brain injury. Excellent face validity indicates that the RCS-E is feasible for assessing primary rehabilitation needs and the present study suggests its applicability to the Danish health care system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0728-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5073960/ /pubmed/27769250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0728-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maribo, Thomas
Pedersen, Asger R.
Jensen, Jim
Nielsen, Jørgen F.
Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended
title Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended
title_full Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended
title_fullStr Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended
title_short Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended
title_sort assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the danish version of rehabilitation complexity scale-extended
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27769250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0728-7
work_keys_str_mv AT maribothomas assessmentofprimaryrehabilitationneedsinneurologicalrehabilitationtranslationadaptationandfacevalidityofthedanishversionofrehabilitationcomplexityscaleextended
AT pedersenasgerr assessmentofprimaryrehabilitationneedsinneurologicalrehabilitationtranslationadaptationandfacevalidityofthedanishversionofrehabilitationcomplexityscaleextended
AT jensenjim assessmentofprimaryrehabilitationneedsinneurologicalrehabilitationtranslationadaptationandfacevalidityofthedanishversionofrehabilitationcomplexityscaleextended
AT nielsenjørgenf assessmentofprimaryrehabilitationneedsinneurologicalrehabilitationtranslationadaptationandfacevalidityofthedanishversionofrehabilitationcomplexityscaleextended