Cargando…
Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended
BACKGROUND: Assessing primary rehabilitation needs in patients with acquired brain injury is a challenge due to case complexity and the heterogeneity of symptoms after brain injury. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended (RCS-E) is an instrument used in assessment of rehabilitation complexity...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27769250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0728-7 |
_version_ | 1782461666603040768 |
---|---|
author | Maribo, Thomas Pedersen, Asger R. Jensen, Jim Nielsen, Jørgen F. |
author_facet | Maribo, Thomas Pedersen, Asger R. Jensen, Jim Nielsen, Jørgen F. |
author_sort | Maribo, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Assessing primary rehabilitation needs in patients with acquired brain injury is a challenge due to case complexity and the heterogeneity of symptoms after brain injury. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended (RCS-E) is an instrument used in assessment of rehabilitation complexity in patients with severe brain injury. The aim of the present study was to translate and test the face validity of the RCS-E as a referral tool for primary rehabilitation. Face validity was tested in a sample of patients with acquired brain injury. METHODS: Ten clinicians and records from 299 patients with acquired brain injury were used in the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and face validation study of the RCS-E. RCS-E was translated into Danish by a standardized forward-backward translation by experts in the field. Face validity was assessed by a multi-professional team assessing 299 patients. The team was asked their opinion on whether the RCS-E presents a sufficient description of the patients. RESULTS: The RCS-E was translated according to international guidelines and tested by health professionals; some adaptations were required due to linguistic problems and differences in the national health system structures. The patients in the study had a mean age of 63.9 years (SD 14.7); 61 % were male. We found an excellent face validity with a mean score of 8.2 (SD 0.34) assessed on a 0–10 scale. CONCLUSIONS: The RCS-E demonstrated to be a valid assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in patients with acquired brain injury. Excellent face validity indicates that the RCS-E is feasible for assessing primary rehabilitation needs and the present study suggests its applicability to the Danish health care system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0728-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5073960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50739602016-10-27 Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended Maribo, Thomas Pedersen, Asger R. Jensen, Jim Nielsen, Jørgen F. BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessing primary rehabilitation needs in patients with acquired brain injury is a challenge due to case complexity and the heterogeneity of symptoms after brain injury. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended (RCS-E) is an instrument used in assessment of rehabilitation complexity in patients with severe brain injury. The aim of the present study was to translate and test the face validity of the RCS-E as a referral tool for primary rehabilitation. Face validity was tested in a sample of patients with acquired brain injury. METHODS: Ten clinicians and records from 299 patients with acquired brain injury were used in the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and face validation study of the RCS-E. RCS-E was translated into Danish by a standardized forward-backward translation by experts in the field. Face validity was assessed by a multi-professional team assessing 299 patients. The team was asked their opinion on whether the RCS-E presents a sufficient description of the patients. RESULTS: The RCS-E was translated according to international guidelines and tested by health professionals; some adaptations were required due to linguistic problems and differences in the national health system structures. The patients in the study had a mean age of 63.9 years (SD 14.7); 61 % were male. We found an excellent face validity with a mean score of 8.2 (SD 0.34) assessed on a 0–10 scale. CONCLUSIONS: The RCS-E demonstrated to be a valid assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in patients with acquired brain injury. Excellent face validity indicates that the RCS-E is feasible for assessing primary rehabilitation needs and the present study suggests its applicability to the Danish health care system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0728-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5073960/ /pubmed/27769250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0728-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maribo, Thomas Pedersen, Asger R. Jensen, Jim Nielsen, Jørgen F. Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended |
title | Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended |
title_full | Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended |
title_fullStr | Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended |
title_short | Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended |
title_sort | assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the danish version of rehabilitation complexity scale-extended |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27769250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0728-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maribothomas assessmentofprimaryrehabilitationneedsinneurologicalrehabilitationtranslationadaptationandfacevalidityofthedanishversionofrehabilitationcomplexityscaleextended AT pedersenasgerr assessmentofprimaryrehabilitationneedsinneurologicalrehabilitationtranslationadaptationandfacevalidityofthedanishversionofrehabilitationcomplexityscaleextended AT jensenjim assessmentofprimaryrehabilitationneedsinneurologicalrehabilitationtranslationadaptationandfacevalidityofthedanishversionofrehabilitationcomplexityscaleextended AT nielsenjørgenf assessmentofprimaryrehabilitationneedsinneurologicalrehabilitationtranslationadaptationandfacevalidityofthedanishversionofrehabilitationcomplexityscaleextended |