Cargando…
In vitro comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture
INTRODUCTION: Materials used to fabricate provisional restorations can be classified as acrylics or resin composites. Provisional crows can be either prefabricated or custom made. ACRYLICS: These materials have been used to fabricate provisional restorations since the 1930s and usually available as...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5074009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829758 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.191936 |
_version_ | 1782461677984284672 |
---|---|
author | Saisadan, D. Manimaran, P. Meenapriya, P. K. |
author_facet | Saisadan, D. Manimaran, P. Meenapriya, P. K. |
author_sort | Saisadan, D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Materials used to fabricate provisional restorations can be classified as acrylics or resin composites. Provisional crows can be either prefabricated or custom made. ACRYLICS: These materials have been used to fabricate provisional restorations since the 1930s and usually available as powder and liquid. They are the most commonly used materials today for both single-unit and multiple-unit restorations. In general, their popularity is due to their low cost, acceptable esthetics, and versatility. COMPOSITES: Composite provisional materials use bis-acryl resin, a hydrophobic material that is similar to bis-GMA. Composites are available as auto-polymerized, dualpolymerized and visible light polymerized. PREFORMED CROWNS: Preformed provisional crowns or matrices usually consist of tooth-shaped shells of plastic, cellulose acetate or metal. They are commercially available in various tooth sizes and are usually selected for a particular tooth anatomy. They are commonly relined with acrylic resin to provide a more custom fit before cementation, but the plastic and metal crown shells can also be cemented directly onto prepared teeth. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to choose a material to serve as a better interim prosthesis and to compare three different properties – flexural strength, compressive strength, and color stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The samples were made with three different provisional materials (Revotek LC, Protemp 4, TemSpan). RESULT: It was inferred from the study that no one material was superior in all three tested parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5074009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50740092016-11-09 In vitro comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture Saisadan, D. Manimaran, P. Meenapriya, P. K. J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Materials used to fabricate provisional restorations can be classified as acrylics or resin composites. Provisional crows can be either prefabricated or custom made. ACRYLICS: These materials have been used to fabricate provisional restorations since the 1930s and usually available as powder and liquid. They are the most commonly used materials today for both single-unit and multiple-unit restorations. In general, their popularity is due to their low cost, acceptable esthetics, and versatility. COMPOSITES: Composite provisional materials use bis-acryl resin, a hydrophobic material that is similar to bis-GMA. Composites are available as auto-polymerized, dualpolymerized and visible light polymerized. PREFORMED CROWNS: Preformed provisional crowns or matrices usually consist of tooth-shaped shells of plastic, cellulose acetate or metal. They are commercially available in various tooth sizes and are usually selected for a particular tooth anatomy. They are commonly relined with acrylic resin to provide a more custom fit before cementation, but the plastic and metal crown shells can also be cemented directly onto prepared teeth. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to choose a material to serve as a better interim prosthesis and to compare three different properties – flexural strength, compressive strength, and color stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The samples were made with three different provisional materials (Revotek LC, Protemp 4, TemSpan). RESULT: It was inferred from the study that no one material was superior in all three tested parameters. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5074009/ /pubmed/27829758 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.191936 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Saisadan, D. Manimaran, P. Meenapriya, P. K. In vitro comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture |
title | In vitro comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture |
title_full | In vitro comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture |
title_fullStr | In vitro comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture |
title_short | In vitro comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture |
title_sort | in vitro comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5074009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829758 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.191936 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saisadand invitrocomparativeevaluationofmechanicalpropertiesoftemporaryrestorativematerialsusedinfixedpartialdenture AT manimaranp invitrocomparativeevaluationofmechanicalpropertiesoftemporaryrestorativematerialsusedinfixedpartialdenture AT meenapriyapk invitrocomparativeevaluationofmechanicalpropertiesoftemporaryrestorativematerialsusedinfixedpartialdenture |