Cargando…

Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing

Task interruptions and background speech, both part of the everyday situation in office environments, impair cognitive performance. The current experiments explored the combined effects of background speech and task interruptions on word processed writing—arguably, a task representative of office wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keus van de Poll, Marijke, Sörqvist, Patrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5074307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27818574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.3221
_version_ 1782461710232190976
author Keus van de Poll, Marijke
Sörqvist, Patrik
author_facet Keus van de Poll, Marijke
Sörqvist, Patrik
author_sort Keus van de Poll, Marijke
collection PubMed
description Task interruptions and background speech, both part of the everyday situation in office environments, impair cognitive performance. The current experiments explored the combined effects of background speech and task interruptions on word processed writing—arguably, a task representative of office work. Participants wrote stories, in silence or in the presence of background speech (monologues, halfalogues and dialogues), and were occasionally interrupted by a secondary task. Writing speed was comparably low during the immediate period after the interruption (Experiments 1 and 2); it took 10–15 s to regain full writing speed. Background speech had only a small effect on performance (Experiment 1), but a dialogue was more disruptive than a halfalogue (Experiment 2). Background speech did not add to the cost caused by task interruptions. However, subjective measures suggested that speech, just as interruptions, contributed to perceived workload. The findings are discussed in view of attentional capture and interference‐by‐process mechanisms.© 2016 The Authors. Applied Cognitive Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5074307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50743072016-11-04 Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing Keus van de Poll, Marijke Sörqvist, Patrik Appl Cogn Psychol Research Articles Task interruptions and background speech, both part of the everyday situation in office environments, impair cognitive performance. The current experiments explored the combined effects of background speech and task interruptions on word processed writing—arguably, a task representative of office work. Participants wrote stories, in silence or in the presence of background speech (monologues, halfalogues and dialogues), and were occasionally interrupted by a secondary task. Writing speed was comparably low during the immediate period after the interruption (Experiments 1 and 2); it took 10–15 s to regain full writing speed. Background speech had only a small effect on performance (Experiment 1), but a dialogue was more disruptive than a halfalogue (Experiment 2). Background speech did not add to the cost caused by task interruptions. However, subjective measures suggested that speech, just as interruptions, contributed to perceived workload. The findings are discussed in view of attentional capture and interference‐by‐process mechanisms.© 2016 The Authors. Applied Cognitive Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-04-13 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5074307/ /pubmed/27818574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.3221 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Applied Cognitive Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Keus van de Poll, Marijke
Sörqvist, Patrik
Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing
title Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing
title_full Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing
title_fullStr Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing
title_short Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing
title_sort effects of task interruption and background speech on word processed writing
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5074307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27818574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.3221
work_keys_str_mv AT keusvandepollmarijke effectsoftaskinterruptionandbackgroundspeechonwordprocessedwriting
AT sorqvistpatrik effectsoftaskinterruptionandbackgroundspeechonwordprocessedwriting