Cargando…

Cost‐Effectiveness of LDL‐C Lowering With Evolocumab in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in the United States

Randomized trials have shown marked reductions in low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C), a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), when evolocumab is administered. We hypothesized that evolocumab added to standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone is cost‐effective in the treatment of patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gandra, Shravanthi R., Villa, Guillermo, Fonarow, Gregg C., Lothgren, Mickael, Lindgren, Peter, Somaratne, Ransi, van Hout, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5074319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27092712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22535
_version_ 1782461712815882240
author Gandra, Shravanthi R.
Villa, Guillermo
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Lothgren, Mickael
Lindgren, Peter
Somaratne, Ransi
van Hout, Ben
author_facet Gandra, Shravanthi R.
Villa, Guillermo
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Lothgren, Mickael
Lindgren, Peter
Somaratne, Ransi
van Hout, Ben
author_sort Gandra, Shravanthi R.
collection PubMed
description Randomized trials have shown marked reductions in low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C), a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), when evolocumab is administered. We hypothesized that evolocumab added to standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone is cost‐effective in the treatment of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) or atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) with or without statin intolerance and LDL‐C >100 mg/dL. Using a Markov cohort state transition model, primary and recurrent CVD event rates were predicted considering population‐specific trial‐based mean risk factors and calibrated against observed rates in the real world. The LDL‐C–lowering effect from population‐specific phase 3 randomized studies for evolocumab was used together with estimated LDL‐C–lowering effect on CVD event rates per 38.67‐mg/dL LDL‐C lowering from a statin‐trial meta‐analysis. Costs and utilities were included from published sources. Evolocumab treatment was associated with both increased cost and improved quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALY): HeFH (incremental cost: US$153 289, incremental QALY: 2.02, incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio: US$75 863/QALY); ASCVD (US$158 307, 1.12, US$141 699/QALY); and ASCVD with statin intolerance (US$136 903, 1.36, US$100 309/QALY). Evolocumab met both the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and World Health Organization (WHO) thresholds in each population evaluated. Sensitivity and scenario analyses confirmed that model results were robust to changes in model parameters. Among patients with HeFH and ASCVD with or without statin intolerance, evolocumab added to SOC may provide a cost‐effective treatment option for lowering LDL‐C using ACC/AHA intermediate/high value and WHO cost‐effectiveness thresholds. More definitive information on the clinical and economic value of evolocumab will be available from the forthcoming CVD outcomes study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5074319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50743192016-11-04 Cost‐Effectiveness of LDL‐C Lowering With Evolocumab in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in the United States Gandra, Shravanthi R. Villa, Guillermo Fonarow, Gregg C. Lothgren, Mickael Lindgren, Peter Somaratne, Ransi van Hout, Ben Clin Cardiol Quality and Outcomes Randomized trials have shown marked reductions in low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C), a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), when evolocumab is administered. We hypothesized that evolocumab added to standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone is cost‐effective in the treatment of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) or atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) with or without statin intolerance and LDL‐C >100 mg/dL. Using a Markov cohort state transition model, primary and recurrent CVD event rates were predicted considering population‐specific trial‐based mean risk factors and calibrated against observed rates in the real world. The LDL‐C–lowering effect from population‐specific phase 3 randomized studies for evolocumab was used together with estimated LDL‐C–lowering effect on CVD event rates per 38.67‐mg/dL LDL‐C lowering from a statin‐trial meta‐analysis. Costs and utilities were included from published sources. Evolocumab treatment was associated with both increased cost and improved quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALY): HeFH (incremental cost: US$153 289, incremental QALY: 2.02, incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio: US$75 863/QALY); ASCVD (US$158 307, 1.12, US$141 699/QALY); and ASCVD with statin intolerance (US$136 903, 1.36, US$100 309/QALY). Evolocumab met both the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and World Health Organization (WHO) thresholds in each population evaluated. Sensitivity and scenario analyses confirmed that model results were robust to changes in model parameters. Among patients with HeFH and ASCVD with or without statin intolerance, evolocumab added to SOC may provide a cost‐effective treatment option for lowering LDL‐C using ACC/AHA intermediate/high value and WHO cost‐effectiveness thresholds. More definitive information on the clinical and economic value of evolocumab will be available from the forthcoming CVD outcomes study. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2016-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5074319/ /pubmed/27092712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22535 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Quality and Outcomes
Gandra, Shravanthi R.
Villa, Guillermo
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Lothgren, Mickael
Lindgren, Peter
Somaratne, Ransi
van Hout, Ben
Cost‐Effectiveness of LDL‐C Lowering With Evolocumab in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in the United States
title Cost‐Effectiveness of LDL‐C Lowering With Evolocumab in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in the United States
title_full Cost‐Effectiveness of LDL‐C Lowering With Evolocumab in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in the United States
title_fullStr Cost‐Effectiveness of LDL‐C Lowering With Evolocumab in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Cost‐Effectiveness of LDL‐C Lowering With Evolocumab in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in the United States
title_short Cost‐Effectiveness of LDL‐C Lowering With Evolocumab in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in the United States
title_sort cost‐effectiveness of ldl‐c lowering with evolocumab in patients with high cardiovascular risk in the united states
topic Quality and Outcomes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5074319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27092712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22535
work_keys_str_mv AT gandrashravanthir costeffectivenessofldlcloweringwithevolocumabinpatientswithhighcardiovascularriskintheunitedstates
AT villaguillermo costeffectivenessofldlcloweringwithevolocumabinpatientswithhighcardiovascularriskintheunitedstates
AT fonarowgreggc costeffectivenessofldlcloweringwithevolocumabinpatientswithhighcardiovascularriskintheunitedstates
AT lothgrenmickael costeffectivenessofldlcloweringwithevolocumabinpatientswithhighcardiovascularriskintheunitedstates
AT lindgrenpeter costeffectivenessofldlcloweringwithevolocumabinpatientswithhighcardiovascularriskintheunitedstates
AT somaratneransi costeffectivenessofldlcloweringwithevolocumabinpatientswithhighcardiovascularriskintheunitedstates
AT vanhoutben costeffectivenessofldlcloweringwithevolocumabinpatientswithhighcardiovascularriskintheunitedstates