Cargando…
The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications
Although the scientific peer review process is crucial to distributing research investments, little has been reported about the decision-making processes used by reviewers. One key attribute likely to be important for decision-making is reviewer expertise. Recent data from an experimental blinded re...
Autores principales: | Gallo, Stephen A., Sullivan, Joanne H., Glisson, Scott R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5074495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27768760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165147 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.
por: Barnett, Adrian G., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The Validation of Peer Review through Research Impact Measures and the Implications for Funding Strategies
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels
por: Carpenter, Afton S, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Teleconference versus Face-to-Face Scientific Peer Review of Grant Application: Effects on Review Outcomes
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Influence of external peer reviewer scores for funding applications on funding board decisions: a retrospective analysis of 1561 reviews
por: Sorrell, Lexy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)