Cargando…
ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING?
BACKGROUND: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has very low risk for infectious complications, ranging the infection rate from 0.4% to 1.1%. Many surgeons still use routine antibiotic prophylaxis AIM: Evaluate the real impact of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies in...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5074668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27759780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201600030010 |
_version_ | 1782461752193056768 |
---|---|
author | PASSOS, Márcio Alexandre Terra PORTARI-FILHO, Pedro Eder |
author_facet | PASSOS, Márcio Alexandre Terra PORTARI-FILHO, Pedro Eder |
author_sort | PASSOS, Márcio Alexandre Terra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has very low risk for infectious complications, ranging the infection rate from 0.4% to 1.1%. Many surgeons still use routine antibiotic prophylaxis AIM: Evaluate the real impact of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies in low risk patients. METHOD: Prospective, randomized and double-blind study. Were evaluated 100 patients that underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy divided in two groups: group A (n=50), patients that received prophylaxis using intravenous Cephazolin (2 g) during anesthetic induction and group B (n=50), patients that didn't receive any antibiotic prophylaxis. The outcome evaluated were infeccious complications at surgical site. The patients were reviewed seven and 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: There was incidence of 2% in infection complications in group A and 2% in group B. There was no statistical significant difference of infectious complications (p=0,05) between the groups. The groups were homogeneous and comparable. CONCLUSION: The use of the antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low risk patients doesn't provide any significant benefit in the decrease of surgical wound infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5074668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50746682016-10-24 ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING? PASSOS, Márcio Alexandre Terra PORTARI-FILHO, Pedro Eder Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article BACKGROUND: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has very low risk for infectious complications, ranging the infection rate from 0.4% to 1.1%. Many surgeons still use routine antibiotic prophylaxis AIM: Evaluate the real impact of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies in low risk patients. METHOD: Prospective, randomized and double-blind study. Were evaluated 100 patients that underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy divided in two groups: group A (n=50), patients that received prophylaxis using intravenous Cephazolin (2 g) during anesthetic induction and group B (n=50), patients that didn't receive any antibiotic prophylaxis. The outcome evaluated were infeccious complications at surgical site. The patients were reviewed seven and 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: There was incidence of 2% in infection complications in group A and 2% in group B. There was no statistical significant difference of infectious complications (p=0,05) between the groups. The groups were homogeneous and comparable. CONCLUSION: The use of the antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low risk patients doesn't provide any significant benefit in the decrease of surgical wound infection. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5074668/ /pubmed/27759780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201600030010 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article PASSOS, Márcio Alexandre Terra PORTARI-FILHO, Pedro Eder ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING? |
title | ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING? |
title_full | ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING? |
title_fullStr | ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING? |
title_full_unstemmed | ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING? |
title_short | ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING? |
title_sort | antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecistectomy: is it worth doing? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5074668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27759780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201600030010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT passosmarcioalexandreterra antibioticprophylaxisinlaparoscopiccholecistectomyisitworthdoing AT portarifilhopedroeder antibioticprophylaxisinlaparoscopiccholecistectomyisitworthdoing |