Cargando…

ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING?

BACKGROUND: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has very low risk for infectious complications, ranging the infection rate from 0.4% to 1.1%. Many surgeons still use routine antibiotic prophylaxis AIM: Evaluate the real impact of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: PASSOS, Márcio Alexandre Terra, PORTARI-FILHO, Pedro Eder
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5074668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27759780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201600030010
_version_ 1782461752193056768
author PASSOS, Márcio Alexandre Terra
PORTARI-FILHO, Pedro Eder
author_facet PASSOS, Márcio Alexandre Terra
PORTARI-FILHO, Pedro Eder
author_sort PASSOS, Márcio Alexandre Terra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has very low risk for infectious complications, ranging the infection rate from 0.4% to 1.1%. Many surgeons still use routine antibiotic prophylaxis AIM: Evaluate the real impact of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies in low risk patients. METHOD: Prospective, randomized and double-blind study. Were evaluated 100 patients that underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy divided in two groups: group A (n=50), patients that received prophylaxis using intravenous Cephazolin (2 g) during anesthetic induction and group B (n=50), patients that didn't receive any antibiotic prophylaxis. The outcome evaluated were infeccious complications at surgical site. The patients were reviewed seven and 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: There was incidence of 2% in infection complications in group A and 2% in group B. There was no statistical significant difference of infectious complications (p=0,05) between the groups. The groups were homogeneous and comparable. CONCLUSION: The use of the antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low risk patients doesn't provide any significant benefit in the decrease of surgical wound infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5074668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50746682016-10-24 ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING? PASSOS, Márcio Alexandre Terra PORTARI-FILHO, Pedro Eder Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article BACKGROUND: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has very low risk for infectious complications, ranging the infection rate from 0.4% to 1.1%. Many surgeons still use routine antibiotic prophylaxis AIM: Evaluate the real impact of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies in low risk patients. METHOD: Prospective, randomized and double-blind study. Were evaluated 100 patients that underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy divided in two groups: group A (n=50), patients that received prophylaxis using intravenous Cephazolin (2 g) during anesthetic induction and group B (n=50), patients that didn't receive any antibiotic prophylaxis. The outcome evaluated were infeccious complications at surgical site. The patients were reviewed seven and 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: There was incidence of 2% in infection complications in group A and 2% in group B. There was no statistical significant difference of infectious complications (p=0,05) between the groups. The groups were homogeneous and comparable. CONCLUSION: The use of the antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low risk patients doesn't provide any significant benefit in the decrease of surgical wound infection. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5074668/ /pubmed/27759780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201600030010 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
PASSOS, Márcio Alexandre Terra
PORTARI-FILHO, Pedro Eder
ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING?
title ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING?
title_full ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING?
title_fullStr ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING?
title_full_unstemmed ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING?
title_short ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING?
title_sort antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecistectomy: is it worth doing?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5074668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27759780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201600030010
work_keys_str_mv AT passosmarcioalexandreterra antibioticprophylaxisinlaparoscopiccholecistectomyisitworthdoing
AT portarifilhopedroeder antibioticprophylaxisinlaparoscopiccholecistectomyisitworthdoing