Cargando…
Seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: When conducting research with Indigenous populations consent should be sought from both individual participants and the local community. We aimed to search and summarise the literature about methods for seeking consent for research with Indigenous populations. METHODS: A systematic liter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27770780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0139-8 |
_version_ | 1782461810353373184 |
---|---|
author | Fitzpatrick, Emily F. M. Martiniuk, Alexandra L. C. D’Antoine, Heather Oscar, June Carter, Maureen Elliott, Elizabeth J. |
author_facet | Fitzpatrick, Emily F. M. Martiniuk, Alexandra L. C. D’Antoine, Heather Oscar, June Carter, Maureen Elliott, Elizabeth J. |
author_sort | Fitzpatrick, Emily F. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When conducting research with Indigenous populations consent should be sought from both individual participants and the local community. We aimed to search and summarise the literature about methods for seeking consent for research with Indigenous populations. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for articles that describe or evaluate the process of seeking informed consent for research with Indigenous participants. Guidelines for ethical research and for seeking consent with Indigenous people are also included in our review. RESULTS: Of 1447 articles found 1391 were excluded (duplicates, irrelevant, not in English); 56 were relevant and included. Articles were categorised into original research that evaluated the consent process (n = 5) or publications detailing the process of seeking consent (n = 13) and guidelines for ethical research (n = 38). Guidelines were categorised into international (n = 8); national (n = 20) and state/regional/local guidelines (n = 10). In five studies based in Australia, Canada and The United States of America the consent process with Indigenous people was objectively evaluated. In 13 other studies interpreters, voice recording, videos, pictures, flipcharts and “plain language” forms were used to assist in seeking consent but these processes were not evaluated. Some Indigenous organisations provide examples of community-designed resources for seeking consent and describe methods of community engagement, but none are evaluated. International, national and local ethical guidelines stress the importance of upholding Indigenous values but fail to specify methods for engaging communities or obtaining individual consent. In the ‘Grey literature’ concerns about the consent process are identified but no solutions are offered. CONCLUSION: Consultation with Indigenous communities is needed to determine how consent should be sought from the community and the individual, and how to evaluate this process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0139-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5075161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50751612016-10-27 Seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review Fitzpatrick, Emily F. M. Martiniuk, Alexandra L. C. D’Antoine, Heather Oscar, June Carter, Maureen Elliott, Elizabeth J. BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: When conducting research with Indigenous populations consent should be sought from both individual participants and the local community. We aimed to search and summarise the literature about methods for seeking consent for research with Indigenous populations. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for articles that describe or evaluate the process of seeking informed consent for research with Indigenous participants. Guidelines for ethical research and for seeking consent with Indigenous people are also included in our review. RESULTS: Of 1447 articles found 1391 were excluded (duplicates, irrelevant, not in English); 56 were relevant and included. Articles were categorised into original research that evaluated the consent process (n = 5) or publications detailing the process of seeking consent (n = 13) and guidelines for ethical research (n = 38). Guidelines were categorised into international (n = 8); national (n = 20) and state/regional/local guidelines (n = 10). In five studies based in Australia, Canada and The United States of America the consent process with Indigenous people was objectively evaluated. In 13 other studies interpreters, voice recording, videos, pictures, flipcharts and “plain language” forms were used to assist in seeking consent but these processes were not evaluated. Some Indigenous organisations provide examples of community-designed resources for seeking consent and describe methods of community engagement, but none are evaluated. International, national and local ethical guidelines stress the importance of upholding Indigenous values but fail to specify methods for engaging communities or obtaining individual consent. In the ‘Grey literature’ concerns about the consent process are identified but no solutions are offered. CONCLUSION: Consultation with Indigenous communities is needed to determine how consent should be sought from the community and the individual, and how to evaluate this process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0139-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5075161/ /pubmed/27770780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0139-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fitzpatrick, Emily F. M. Martiniuk, Alexandra L. C. D’Antoine, Heather Oscar, June Carter, Maureen Elliott, Elizabeth J. Seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review |
title | Seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review |
title_full | Seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review |
title_short | Seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review |
title_sort | seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27770780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0139-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fitzpatrickemilyfm seekingconsentforresearchwithindigenouscommunitiesasystematicreview AT martiniukalexandralc seekingconsentforresearchwithindigenouscommunitiesasystematicreview AT dantoineheather seekingconsentforresearchwithindigenouscommunitiesasystematicreview AT oscarjune seekingconsentforresearchwithindigenouscommunitiesasystematicreview AT cartermaureen seekingconsentforresearchwithindigenouscommunitiesasystematicreview AT elliottelizabethj seekingconsentforresearchwithindigenouscommunitiesasystematicreview |