Cargando…

National ethics guidance in Sub-Saharan Africa on the collection and use of human biological specimens: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Ethical and regulatory guidance on the collection and use of human biospecimens (HBS) for research forms an essential component of national health systems in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where rapid advances in genetic- and genomic-based technologies are fueling clinical trials involving HB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barchi, Francis, Little, Madison T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27770794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0146-9
_version_ 1782461820927213568
author Barchi, Francis
Little, Madison T.
author_facet Barchi, Francis
Little, Madison T.
author_sort Barchi, Francis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ethical and regulatory guidance on the collection and use of human biospecimens (HBS) for research forms an essential component of national health systems in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where rapid advances in genetic- and genomic-based technologies are fueling clinical trials involving HBS and the establishment of large-scale biobanks. METHODS: An extensive multi-level search for publicly available ethics regulatory guidance was conducted for each SSA country. A second review documented active trials listed in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform as of January 2015 in which HBS collection was specified in the protocol. Findings were combined to determine the extent to which countries that are study sites for HBS-related research are supported by regulatory guidance language on the collection, use, ownership and storage of biospecimens. RESULTS: Of the 49 SSA countries, 29 had some form of national ethics guidance, yet only 17 provided language relating to HBS-related research, with specific guidance on consent (14), ownership (6), reuse (10), storage (9), and export/import/transfer (13). Ten countries accounted for 84 % of the active clinical trials involving the collection of HBS in SSA. All except one of these countries were found to have some national guidance in the form of regulations, codes of ethics, and/or standard operating procedures; however, only seven of the ten offered any language specific to HBS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the bulk of registered clinical trials in SSA involving HBS, as well as existing and proposed sites for biorepositories under the H3Africa Initiative, are currently situated in countries with the most complete ethics and regulatory guidance, variability in the regulations themselves may create challenges for planned and future pan-African collaborations and may require legislative action at the national level to revise. Countries in SSA that still lack regulatory guidance on HBS will require extensive health system strengthening in ethics governance before they can be full participants in the modern research enterprise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5075204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50752042016-10-27 National ethics guidance in Sub-Saharan Africa on the collection and use of human biological specimens: a systematic review Barchi, Francis Little, Madison T. BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Ethical and regulatory guidance on the collection and use of human biospecimens (HBS) for research forms an essential component of national health systems in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where rapid advances in genetic- and genomic-based technologies are fueling clinical trials involving HBS and the establishment of large-scale biobanks. METHODS: An extensive multi-level search for publicly available ethics regulatory guidance was conducted for each SSA country. A second review documented active trials listed in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform as of January 2015 in which HBS collection was specified in the protocol. Findings were combined to determine the extent to which countries that are study sites for HBS-related research are supported by regulatory guidance language on the collection, use, ownership and storage of biospecimens. RESULTS: Of the 49 SSA countries, 29 had some form of national ethics guidance, yet only 17 provided language relating to HBS-related research, with specific guidance on consent (14), ownership (6), reuse (10), storage (9), and export/import/transfer (13). Ten countries accounted for 84 % of the active clinical trials involving the collection of HBS in SSA. All except one of these countries were found to have some national guidance in the form of regulations, codes of ethics, and/or standard operating procedures; however, only seven of the ten offered any language specific to HBS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the bulk of registered clinical trials in SSA involving HBS, as well as existing and proposed sites for biorepositories under the H3Africa Initiative, are currently situated in countries with the most complete ethics and regulatory guidance, variability in the regulations themselves may create challenges for planned and future pan-African collaborations and may require legislative action at the national level to revise. Countries in SSA that still lack regulatory guidance on HBS will require extensive health system strengthening in ethics governance before they can be full participants in the modern research enterprise. BioMed Central 2016-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5075204/ /pubmed/27770794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0146-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barchi, Francis
Little, Madison T.
National ethics guidance in Sub-Saharan Africa on the collection and use of human biological specimens: a systematic review
title National ethics guidance in Sub-Saharan Africa on the collection and use of human biological specimens: a systematic review
title_full National ethics guidance in Sub-Saharan Africa on the collection and use of human biological specimens: a systematic review
title_fullStr National ethics guidance in Sub-Saharan Africa on the collection and use of human biological specimens: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed National ethics guidance in Sub-Saharan Africa on the collection and use of human biological specimens: a systematic review
title_short National ethics guidance in Sub-Saharan Africa on the collection and use of human biological specimens: a systematic review
title_sort national ethics guidance in sub-saharan africa on the collection and use of human biological specimens: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27770794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0146-9
work_keys_str_mv AT barchifrancis nationalethicsguidanceinsubsaharanafricaonthecollectionanduseofhumanbiologicalspecimensasystematicreview
AT littlemadisont nationalethicsguidanceinsubsaharanafricaonthecollectionanduseofhumanbiologicalspecimensasystematicreview