Cargando…

A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Around 35–45 % of people in contact with services for a first episode of psychosis are using cannabis. Cannabis use is associated with delays in remission, poorer clinical outcomes, significant increases in the risk of relapse, and lower engagement in work or education. While there is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Sonia, Sheridan Rains, Luke, Marwaha, Steven, Strang, John, Craig, Thomas, Weaver, Tim, McCrone, Paul, King, Michael, Fowler, David, Pilling, Stephen, Marston, Louise, Omar, Rumana Z., Craig, Meghan, Hinton, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27770820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1620-x
_version_ 1782461860001349632
author Johnson, Sonia
Sheridan Rains, Luke
Marwaha, Steven
Strang, John
Craig, Thomas
Weaver, Tim
McCrone, Paul
King, Michael
Fowler, David
Pilling, Stephen
Marston, Louise
Omar, Rumana Z.
Craig, Meghan
Hinton, Mark
author_facet Johnson, Sonia
Sheridan Rains, Luke
Marwaha, Steven
Strang, John
Craig, Thomas
Weaver, Tim
McCrone, Paul
King, Michael
Fowler, David
Pilling, Stephen
Marston, Louise
Omar, Rumana Z.
Craig, Meghan
Hinton, Mark
author_sort Johnson, Sonia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Around 35–45 % of people in contact with services for a first episode of psychosis are using cannabis. Cannabis use is associated with delays in remission, poorer clinical outcomes, significant increases in the risk of relapse, and lower engagement in work or education. While there is a clear need for effective interventions, so far only very limited benefits have been achieved from psychological interventions. Contingency management (CM) is a behavioural intervention in which specified desired behavioural change is reinforced through financial rewards. CM is now recognised to have a substantial evidence base in some contexts and its adoption in the UK is advocated by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance as a treatment for substance or alcohol misuse. However, there is currently little published data testing its effectiveness for reducing cannabis use in early psychosis. METHODS: CIRCLE is a two-arm, rater-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a CM intervention for reducing cannabis use among young people receiving treatment from UK Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services. EIP service users (n = 544) with a recent history of cannabis use will be recruited. The experimental group will receive 12 once-weekly CM sessions, and a voucher reward if urinalysis shows that they have not used cannabis in the previous week. Both the experimental and the control groups will be offered an Optimised Treatment as Usual (OTAU) psychoeducational package targeting cannabis use. Assessment interviews will be performed at consent, at 3 months, and at 18 months. The primary outcome is time to relapse, defined as admission to an acute mental health service. Secondary outcomes include proportion of cannabis-free urine samples during the intervention period, severity of positive psychotic symptoms, quality-adjusted life years, and engagement in work or education. DISCUSSION: CIRCLE is a RCT of CM for cannabis use in young people with a recent history of psychosis (EIP service users) and recent cannabis use. It is designed to investigate whether the intervention is a clinically and cost-effective treatment for cannabis use. It is intended to inform future treatment delivery, particularly in EIP settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN33576045: doi 10.1186/ISRCTN33576045, registered on 28 November 2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5075422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50754222016-10-28 A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Johnson, Sonia Sheridan Rains, Luke Marwaha, Steven Strang, John Craig, Thomas Weaver, Tim McCrone, Paul King, Michael Fowler, David Pilling, Stephen Marston, Louise Omar, Rumana Z. Craig, Meghan Hinton, Mark Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Around 35–45 % of people in contact with services for a first episode of psychosis are using cannabis. Cannabis use is associated with delays in remission, poorer clinical outcomes, significant increases in the risk of relapse, and lower engagement in work or education. While there is a clear need for effective interventions, so far only very limited benefits have been achieved from psychological interventions. Contingency management (CM) is a behavioural intervention in which specified desired behavioural change is reinforced through financial rewards. CM is now recognised to have a substantial evidence base in some contexts and its adoption in the UK is advocated by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance as a treatment for substance or alcohol misuse. However, there is currently little published data testing its effectiveness for reducing cannabis use in early psychosis. METHODS: CIRCLE is a two-arm, rater-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a CM intervention for reducing cannabis use among young people receiving treatment from UK Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services. EIP service users (n = 544) with a recent history of cannabis use will be recruited. The experimental group will receive 12 once-weekly CM sessions, and a voucher reward if urinalysis shows that they have not used cannabis in the previous week. Both the experimental and the control groups will be offered an Optimised Treatment as Usual (OTAU) psychoeducational package targeting cannabis use. Assessment interviews will be performed at consent, at 3 months, and at 18 months. The primary outcome is time to relapse, defined as admission to an acute mental health service. Secondary outcomes include proportion of cannabis-free urine samples during the intervention period, severity of positive psychotic symptoms, quality-adjusted life years, and engagement in work or education. DISCUSSION: CIRCLE is a RCT of CM for cannabis use in young people with a recent history of psychosis (EIP service users) and recent cannabis use. It is designed to investigate whether the intervention is a clinically and cost-effective treatment for cannabis use. It is intended to inform future treatment delivery, particularly in EIP settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN33576045: doi 10.1186/ISRCTN33576045, registered on 28 November 2011. BioMed Central 2016-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5075422/ /pubmed/27770820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1620-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Johnson, Sonia
Sheridan Rains, Luke
Marwaha, Steven
Strang, John
Craig, Thomas
Weaver, Tim
McCrone, Paul
King, Michael
Fowler, David
Pilling, Stephen
Marston, Louise
Omar, Rumana Z.
Craig, Meghan
Hinton, Mark
A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (circle): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27770820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1620-x
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonsonia arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sheridanrainsluke arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marwahasteven arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT strangjohn arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT craigthomas arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT weavertim arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mccronepaul arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kingmichael arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fowlerdavid arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pillingstephen arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marstonlouise arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT omarrumanaz arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT craigmeghan arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hintonmark arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT johnsonsonia randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sheridanrainsluke randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marwahasteven randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT strangjohn randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT craigthomas randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT weavertim randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mccronepaul randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kingmichael randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fowlerdavid randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pillingstephen randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marstonlouise randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT omarrumanaz randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT craigmeghan randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hintonmark randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial