Cargando…
A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Around 35–45 % of people in contact with services for a first episode of psychosis are using cannabis. Cannabis use is associated with delays in remission, poorer clinical outcomes, significant increases in the risk of relapse, and lower engagement in work or education. While there is a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27770820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1620-x |
_version_ | 1782461860001349632 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Sonia Sheridan Rains, Luke Marwaha, Steven Strang, John Craig, Thomas Weaver, Tim McCrone, Paul King, Michael Fowler, David Pilling, Stephen Marston, Louise Omar, Rumana Z. Craig, Meghan Hinton, Mark |
author_facet | Johnson, Sonia Sheridan Rains, Luke Marwaha, Steven Strang, John Craig, Thomas Weaver, Tim McCrone, Paul King, Michael Fowler, David Pilling, Stephen Marston, Louise Omar, Rumana Z. Craig, Meghan Hinton, Mark |
author_sort | Johnson, Sonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Around 35–45 % of people in contact with services for a first episode of psychosis are using cannabis. Cannabis use is associated with delays in remission, poorer clinical outcomes, significant increases in the risk of relapse, and lower engagement in work or education. While there is a clear need for effective interventions, so far only very limited benefits have been achieved from psychological interventions. Contingency management (CM) is a behavioural intervention in which specified desired behavioural change is reinforced through financial rewards. CM is now recognised to have a substantial evidence base in some contexts and its adoption in the UK is advocated by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance as a treatment for substance or alcohol misuse. However, there is currently little published data testing its effectiveness for reducing cannabis use in early psychosis. METHODS: CIRCLE is a two-arm, rater-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a CM intervention for reducing cannabis use among young people receiving treatment from UK Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services. EIP service users (n = 544) with a recent history of cannabis use will be recruited. The experimental group will receive 12 once-weekly CM sessions, and a voucher reward if urinalysis shows that they have not used cannabis in the previous week. Both the experimental and the control groups will be offered an Optimised Treatment as Usual (OTAU) psychoeducational package targeting cannabis use. Assessment interviews will be performed at consent, at 3 months, and at 18 months. The primary outcome is time to relapse, defined as admission to an acute mental health service. Secondary outcomes include proportion of cannabis-free urine samples during the intervention period, severity of positive psychotic symptoms, quality-adjusted life years, and engagement in work or education. DISCUSSION: CIRCLE is a RCT of CM for cannabis use in young people with a recent history of psychosis (EIP service users) and recent cannabis use. It is designed to investigate whether the intervention is a clinically and cost-effective treatment for cannabis use. It is intended to inform future treatment delivery, particularly in EIP settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN33576045: doi 10.1186/ISRCTN33576045, registered on 28 November 2011. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5075422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50754222016-10-28 A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Johnson, Sonia Sheridan Rains, Luke Marwaha, Steven Strang, John Craig, Thomas Weaver, Tim McCrone, Paul King, Michael Fowler, David Pilling, Stephen Marston, Louise Omar, Rumana Z. Craig, Meghan Hinton, Mark Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Around 35–45 % of people in contact with services for a first episode of psychosis are using cannabis. Cannabis use is associated with delays in remission, poorer clinical outcomes, significant increases in the risk of relapse, and lower engagement in work or education. While there is a clear need for effective interventions, so far only very limited benefits have been achieved from psychological interventions. Contingency management (CM) is a behavioural intervention in which specified desired behavioural change is reinforced through financial rewards. CM is now recognised to have a substantial evidence base in some contexts and its adoption in the UK is advocated by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance as a treatment for substance or alcohol misuse. However, there is currently little published data testing its effectiveness for reducing cannabis use in early psychosis. METHODS: CIRCLE is a two-arm, rater-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a CM intervention for reducing cannabis use among young people receiving treatment from UK Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services. EIP service users (n = 544) with a recent history of cannabis use will be recruited. The experimental group will receive 12 once-weekly CM sessions, and a voucher reward if urinalysis shows that they have not used cannabis in the previous week. Both the experimental and the control groups will be offered an Optimised Treatment as Usual (OTAU) psychoeducational package targeting cannabis use. Assessment interviews will be performed at consent, at 3 months, and at 18 months. The primary outcome is time to relapse, defined as admission to an acute mental health service. Secondary outcomes include proportion of cannabis-free urine samples during the intervention period, severity of positive psychotic symptoms, quality-adjusted life years, and engagement in work or education. DISCUSSION: CIRCLE is a RCT of CM for cannabis use in young people with a recent history of psychosis (EIP service users) and recent cannabis use. It is designed to investigate whether the intervention is a clinically and cost-effective treatment for cannabis use. It is intended to inform future treatment delivery, particularly in EIP settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN33576045: doi 10.1186/ISRCTN33576045, registered on 28 November 2011. BioMed Central 2016-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5075422/ /pubmed/27770820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1620-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Johnson, Sonia Sheridan Rains, Luke Marwaha, Steven Strang, John Craig, Thomas Weaver, Tim McCrone, Paul King, Michael Fowler, David Pilling, Stephen Marston, Louise Omar, Rumana Z. Craig, Meghan Hinton, Mark A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (circle): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27770820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1620-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonsonia arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sheridanrainsluke arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marwahasteven arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT strangjohn arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT craigthomas arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT weavertim arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mccronepaul arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kingmichael arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fowlerdavid arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pillingstephen arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marstonlouise arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT omarrumanaz arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT craigmeghan arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hintonmark arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT johnsonsonia randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sheridanrainsluke randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marwahasteven randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT strangjohn randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT craigthomas randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT weavertim randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mccronepaul randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kingmichael randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fowlerdavid randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pillingstephen randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marstonlouise randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT omarrumanaz randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT craigmeghan randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hintonmark randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofacontingencymanagementinterventioncomparedtotreatmentasusualforreductionofcannabisuseandofrelapseinearlypsychosiscircleastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |