Cargando…

Biomechanical analysis of the effect of congruence, depth and radius on the stability ratio of a simplistic ‘ball-and-socket’ joint model

OBJECTIVES: The bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR) allows for quantification of the bony stabilisers in vivo. We aimed to biomechanically validate the BSSR, determine whether joint incongruence affects the stability ratio (SR) of a shoulder model, and determine the correct parameters (glenoid conc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ernstbrunner, L., Werthel, J-D., Hatta, T., Thoreson, A. R., Resch, H., An, K-N., Moroder, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27729312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0078.R1
_version_ 1782461934230044672
author Ernstbrunner, L.
Werthel, J-D.
Hatta, T.
Thoreson, A. R.
Resch, H.
An, K-N.
Moroder, P.
author_facet Ernstbrunner, L.
Werthel, J-D.
Hatta, T.
Thoreson, A. R.
Resch, H.
An, K-N.
Moroder, P.
author_sort Ernstbrunner, L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR) allows for quantification of the bony stabilisers in vivo. We aimed to biomechanically validate the BSSR, determine whether joint incongruence affects the stability ratio (SR) of a shoulder model, and determine the correct parameters (glenoid concavity versus humeral head radius) for calculation of the BSSR in vivo. METHODS: Four polyethylene balls (radii: 19.1 mm to 38.1 mm) were used to mould four fitting sockets in four different depths (3.2 mm to 19.1mm). The SR was measured in biomechanical congruent and incongruent experimental series. The experimental SR of a congruent system was compared with the calculated SR based on the BSSR approach. Differences in SR between congruent and incongruent experimental conditions were quantified. Finally, the experimental SR was compared with either calculated SR based on the socket concavity or plastic ball radius. RESULTS: The experimental SR is comparable with the calculated SR (mean difference 10%, sd 8%; relative values). The experimental incongruence study observed almost no differences (2%, sd 2%). The calculated SR on the basis of the socket concavity radius is superior in predicting the experimental SR (mean difference 10%, sd 9%) compared with the calculated SR based on the plastic ball radius (mean difference 42%, sd 55%). CONCLUSION: The present biomechanical investigation confirmed the validity of the BSSR. Incongruence has no significant effect on the SR of a shoulder model. In the event of an incongruent system, the calculation of the BSSR on the basis of the glenoid concavity radius is recommended. Cite this article: L. Ernstbrunner, J-D. Werthel, T. Hatta, A. R. Thoreson, H. Resch, K-N. An, P. Moroder. Biomechanical analysis of the effect of congruence, depth and radius on the stability ratio of a simplistic ‘ball-and-socket’ joint model. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:453–460. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0078.R1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5075797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50757972016-11-08 Biomechanical analysis of the effect of congruence, depth and radius on the stability ratio of a simplistic ‘ball-and-socket’ joint model Ernstbrunner, L. Werthel, J-D. Hatta, T. Thoreson, A. R. Resch, H. An, K-N. Moroder, P. Bone Joint Res Shoulder and Elbow OBJECTIVES: The bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR) allows for quantification of the bony stabilisers in vivo. We aimed to biomechanically validate the BSSR, determine whether joint incongruence affects the stability ratio (SR) of a shoulder model, and determine the correct parameters (glenoid concavity versus humeral head radius) for calculation of the BSSR in vivo. METHODS: Four polyethylene balls (radii: 19.1 mm to 38.1 mm) were used to mould four fitting sockets in four different depths (3.2 mm to 19.1mm). The SR was measured in biomechanical congruent and incongruent experimental series. The experimental SR of a congruent system was compared with the calculated SR based on the BSSR approach. Differences in SR between congruent and incongruent experimental conditions were quantified. Finally, the experimental SR was compared with either calculated SR based on the socket concavity or plastic ball radius. RESULTS: The experimental SR is comparable with the calculated SR (mean difference 10%, sd 8%; relative values). The experimental incongruence study observed almost no differences (2%, sd 2%). The calculated SR on the basis of the socket concavity radius is superior in predicting the experimental SR (mean difference 10%, sd 9%) compared with the calculated SR based on the plastic ball radius (mean difference 42%, sd 55%). CONCLUSION: The present biomechanical investigation confirmed the validity of the BSSR. Incongruence has no significant effect on the SR of a shoulder model. In the event of an incongruent system, the calculation of the BSSR on the basis of the glenoid concavity radius is recommended. Cite this article: L. Ernstbrunner, J-D. Werthel, T. Hatta, A. R. Thoreson, H. Resch, K-N. An, P. Moroder. Biomechanical analysis of the effect of congruence, depth and radius on the stability ratio of a simplistic ‘ball-and-socket’ joint model. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:453–460. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0078.R1. 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5075797/ /pubmed/27729312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0078.R1 Text en © 2016 Ernstbrunner et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Shoulder and Elbow
Ernstbrunner, L.
Werthel, J-D.
Hatta, T.
Thoreson, A. R.
Resch, H.
An, K-N.
Moroder, P.
Biomechanical analysis of the effect of congruence, depth and radius on the stability ratio of a simplistic ‘ball-and-socket’ joint model
title Biomechanical analysis of the effect of congruence, depth and radius on the stability ratio of a simplistic ‘ball-and-socket’ joint model
title_full Biomechanical analysis of the effect of congruence, depth and radius on the stability ratio of a simplistic ‘ball-and-socket’ joint model
title_fullStr Biomechanical analysis of the effect of congruence, depth and radius on the stability ratio of a simplistic ‘ball-and-socket’ joint model
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical analysis of the effect of congruence, depth and radius on the stability ratio of a simplistic ‘ball-and-socket’ joint model
title_short Biomechanical analysis of the effect of congruence, depth and radius on the stability ratio of a simplistic ‘ball-and-socket’ joint model
title_sort biomechanical analysis of the effect of congruence, depth and radius on the stability ratio of a simplistic ‘ball-and-socket’ joint model
topic Shoulder and Elbow
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27729312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0078.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT ernstbrunnerl biomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectofcongruencedepthandradiusonthestabilityratioofasimplisticballandsocketjointmodel
AT wertheljd biomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectofcongruencedepthandradiusonthestabilityratioofasimplisticballandsocketjointmodel
AT hattat biomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectofcongruencedepthandradiusonthestabilityratioofasimplisticballandsocketjointmodel
AT thoresonar biomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectofcongruencedepthandradiusonthestabilityratioofasimplisticballandsocketjointmodel
AT reschh biomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectofcongruencedepthandradiusonthestabilityratioofasimplisticballandsocketjointmodel
AT ankn biomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectofcongruencedepthandradiusonthestabilityratioofasimplisticballandsocketjointmodel
AT moroderp biomechanicalanalysisoftheeffectofcongruencedepthandradiusonthestabilityratioofasimplisticballandsocketjointmodel