Cargando…
Male food defence as a by-product of intersexual cooperation in a non-human primate
Males in a number of group-living species fight in intergroup conflicts to defend access to food resources, a seemingly paradoxical behaviour, given that this resource does not usually limit male fitness directly. We investigated the mechanism(s) driving apparent male food defence in wild vervet mon...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27775042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35800 |
_version_ | 1782461942331342848 |
---|---|
author | Arseneau-Robar, T. Jean M. Müller, Eliane Taucher, Anouk L. van Schaik, Carel P. Willems, Erik P. |
author_facet | Arseneau-Robar, T. Jean M. Müller, Eliane Taucher, Anouk L. van Schaik, Carel P. Willems, Erik P. |
author_sort | Arseneau-Robar, T. Jean M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Males in a number of group-living species fight in intergroup conflicts to defend access to food resources, a seemingly paradoxical behaviour, given that this resource does not usually limit male fitness directly. We investigated the mechanism(s) driving apparent male food defence in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops pygerythrus) by testing the effect that female resource access, and female audience size and activity had on the response of focal males during simulated intergroup encounters. Males do not appear to defend food to increase the reproductive success of female group members because their response was not influenced by the presence of provisioning boxes that only females could access. Female audience size was also unimportant, suggesting males do not participate in intergroup encounters to advertise their quality to potential mates. However, focal males almost always followed/supported female group members who initiated an approach towards simulated intruders, supporting that male participation largely functions to gain status as a cooperative group member, and that apparent male food defence in this species arises as a by-product of intersexual cooperation. Our study highlights that considering audience composition and activity can reveal the presence of social incentives and illuminate the evolutionary mechanism(s) promoting joint action in intergroup aggression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5075891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50758912016-10-28 Male food defence as a by-product of intersexual cooperation in a non-human primate Arseneau-Robar, T. Jean M. Müller, Eliane Taucher, Anouk L. van Schaik, Carel P. Willems, Erik P. Sci Rep Article Males in a number of group-living species fight in intergroup conflicts to defend access to food resources, a seemingly paradoxical behaviour, given that this resource does not usually limit male fitness directly. We investigated the mechanism(s) driving apparent male food defence in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops pygerythrus) by testing the effect that female resource access, and female audience size and activity had on the response of focal males during simulated intergroup encounters. Males do not appear to defend food to increase the reproductive success of female group members because their response was not influenced by the presence of provisioning boxes that only females could access. Female audience size was also unimportant, suggesting males do not participate in intergroup encounters to advertise their quality to potential mates. However, focal males almost always followed/supported female group members who initiated an approach towards simulated intruders, supporting that male participation largely functions to gain status as a cooperative group member, and that apparent male food defence in this species arises as a by-product of intersexual cooperation. Our study highlights that considering audience composition and activity can reveal the presence of social incentives and illuminate the evolutionary mechanism(s) promoting joint action in intergroup aggression. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5075891/ /pubmed/27775042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35800 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Arseneau-Robar, T. Jean M. Müller, Eliane Taucher, Anouk L. van Schaik, Carel P. Willems, Erik P. Male food defence as a by-product of intersexual cooperation in a non-human primate |
title | Male food defence as a by-product of intersexual cooperation in a non-human primate |
title_full | Male food defence as a by-product of intersexual cooperation in a non-human primate |
title_fullStr | Male food defence as a by-product of intersexual cooperation in a non-human primate |
title_full_unstemmed | Male food defence as a by-product of intersexual cooperation in a non-human primate |
title_short | Male food defence as a by-product of intersexual cooperation in a non-human primate |
title_sort | male food defence as a by-product of intersexual cooperation in a non-human primate |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27775042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35800 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arseneaurobartjeanm malefooddefenceasabyproductofintersexualcooperationinanonhumanprimate AT mullereliane malefooddefenceasabyproductofintersexualcooperationinanonhumanprimate AT taucheranoukl malefooddefenceasabyproductofintersexualcooperationinanonhumanprimate AT vanschaikcarelp malefooddefenceasabyproductofintersexualcooperationinanonhumanprimate AT willemserikp malefooddefenceasabyproductofintersexualcooperationinanonhumanprimate |