Cargando…

Mechanoreceptor Reinnervation of Autografts Versus Allografts After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Loss of proprioceptive function occurs after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Clinical, motor, and proprioceptive function is known to improve after ACL reconstruction but does not return to normal. While histological studies of human ACL allografts have been unable to demonstra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Simon W., Valladares, Roberto D., Loi, Florence, Dragoo, Jason L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
25
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5076746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27803939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116668782
_version_ 1782462082683240448
author Young, Simon W.
Valladares, Roberto D.
Loi, Florence
Dragoo, Jason L.
author_facet Young, Simon W.
Valladares, Roberto D.
Loi, Florence
Dragoo, Jason L.
author_sort Young, Simon W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Loss of proprioceptive function occurs after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Clinical, motor, and proprioceptive function is known to improve after ACL reconstruction but does not return to normal. While histological studies of human ACL allografts have been unable to demonstrate mechanoreceptor reinnervation, animal data suggest that reinnervation may occur when an autograft is used. PURPOSE: To compare the presence or absence of mechanoreceptors between allograft versus autograft after ACL reconstruction in humans. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Ten patients with previous ACL reconstruction presenting for either revision ACL surgery or knee arthroscopy for other reasons were enrolled in a prospective, comparative study. Five patients had a previous autograft ACL and 5 patients had an allograft. Biopsies, either from intact or ruptured grafts, were taken from identical locations as close to the femoral and tibial insertions as possible. Specimens were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) and monoclonal antibodies against neurofilament protein (NFP), known to be present in mechanoreceptor tissue. Immunohistochemical examination was carried out, and the number of NFP+ neural tissue analogs was counted and compared with that of native ACL tissue. RESULTS: The mean time between original graft and biopsy was 6.9 years (range, 0.5-15 years). Histological examination showed significantly less NFP+ neural analogs in allograft and autograft patients than control tissue (mean number of NFP+ analogs per high-power field, 0.7 ± 0.9 [allograft] and 0.5 ± 0.8 [autograft] vs 4.7 ± 0.9 [controls]; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in NFP analogs between autograft and allograft tissue. CONCLUSION: We found a reduced concentration of NFP+ neural analogs in ACL grafts compared with native ACL tissue. This deficit exists irrespective of whether allograft or autograft is used. These findings may explain the continued proprioceptive deficits seen clinically after ACL reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5076746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50767462016-11-01 Mechanoreceptor Reinnervation of Autografts Versus Allografts After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Young, Simon W. Valladares, Roberto D. Loi, Florence Dragoo, Jason L. Orthop J Sports Med 25 BACKGROUND: Loss of proprioceptive function occurs after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Clinical, motor, and proprioceptive function is known to improve after ACL reconstruction but does not return to normal. While histological studies of human ACL allografts have been unable to demonstrate mechanoreceptor reinnervation, animal data suggest that reinnervation may occur when an autograft is used. PURPOSE: To compare the presence or absence of mechanoreceptors between allograft versus autograft after ACL reconstruction in humans. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Ten patients with previous ACL reconstruction presenting for either revision ACL surgery or knee arthroscopy for other reasons were enrolled in a prospective, comparative study. Five patients had a previous autograft ACL and 5 patients had an allograft. Biopsies, either from intact or ruptured grafts, were taken from identical locations as close to the femoral and tibial insertions as possible. Specimens were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) and monoclonal antibodies against neurofilament protein (NFP), known to be present in mechanoreceptor tissue. Immunohistochemical examination was carried out, and the number of NFP+ neural tissue analogs was counted and compared with that of native ACL tissue. RESULTS: The mean time between original graft and biopsy was 6.9 years (range, 0.5-15 years). Histological examination showed significantly less NFP+ neural analogs in allograft and autograft patients than control tissue (mean number of NFP+ analogs per high-power field, 0.7 ± 0.9 [allograft] and 0.5 ± 0.8 [autograft] vs 4.7 ± 0.9 [controls]; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in NFP analogs between autograft and allograft tissue. CONCLUSION: We found a reduced concentration of NFP+ neural analogs in ACL grafts compared with native ACL tissue. This deficit exists irrespective of whether allograft or autograft is used. These findings may explain the continued proprioceptive deficits seen clinically after ACL reconstruction. SAGE Publications 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5076746/ /pubmed/27803939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116668782 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 25
Young, Simon W.
Valladares, Roberto D.
Loi, Florence
Dragoo, Jason L.
Mechanoreceptor Reinnervation of Autografts Versus Allografts After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title Mechanoreceptor Reinnervation of Autografts Versus Allografts After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full Mechanoreceptor Reinnervation of Autografts Versus Allografts After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_fullStr Mechanoreceptor Reinnervation of Autografts Versus Allografts After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Mechanoreceptor Reinnervation of Autografts Versus Allografts After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_short Mechanoreceptor Reinnervation of Autografts Versus Allografts After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_sort mechanoreceptor reinnervation of autografts versus allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic 25
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5076746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27803939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116668782
work_keys_str_mv AT youngsimonw mechanoreceptorreinnervationofautograftsversusallograftsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT valladaresrobertod mechanoreceptorreinnervationofautograftsversusallograftsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT loiflorence mechanoreceptorreinnervationofautograftsversusallograftsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT dragoojasonl mechanoreceptorreinnervationofautograftsversusallograftsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction