Cargando…
Detection of anti-infliximab antibodies is impacted by antibody titer, infliximab level and IgG4 antibodies: a systematic comparison of three different assays
BACKGROUND: There is scant information on the accuracy of different assays used to measure anti-infliximab antibodies (ADAs), especially in the presence of detectable infliximab (IFX). We thus aimed to evaluate and compare three different assays for the detection of IFX and ADAs and to clarify the i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5076767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27803733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756283X16658223 |
_version_ | 1782462083952017408 |
---|---|
author | Afonso, Joana Lopes, Susana Gonçalves, Raquel Caldeira, Paulo Lago, Paula Tavares de Sousa, Helena Ramos, Jaime Gonçalves, Ana Rita Ministro, Paula Rosa, Isadora Vieira, Ana Isabel Coelho, Rosa Tavares, Patrícia Soares, João Sousa, Ana Lúcia Carvalho, Diana Sousa, Paula da Silva, João Pereira Meira, Tânia Silva Ferreira, Filipa Dias, Cláudia Camila Chowers, Yehuda Ben-Horin, Shomron Magro, Fernando |
author_facet | Afonso, Joana Lopes, Susana Gonçalves, Raquel Caldeira, Paulo Lago, Paula Tavares de Sousa, Helena Ramos, Jaime Gonçalves, Ana Rita Ministro, Paula Rosa, Isadora Vieira, Ana Isabel Coelho, Rosa Tavares, Patrícia Soares, João Sousa, Ana Lúcia Carvalho, Diana Sousa, Paula da Silva, João Pereira Meira, Tânia Silva Ferreira, Filipa Dias, Cláudia Camila Chowers, Yehuda Ben-Horin, Shomron Magro, Fernando |
author_sort | Afonso, Joana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is scant information on the accuracy of different assays used to measure anti-infliximab antibodies (ADAs), especially in the presence of detectable infliximab (IFX). We thus aimed to evaluate and compare three different assays for the detection of IFX and ADAs and to clarify the impact of the presence of circulating IFX on the accuracy of the ADA assays. METHODS: Blood samples from 79 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients treated with infliximab were assessed for IFX levels and ADAs using three different assays: an in-house assay and two commercial kits, Immundiagnostik and Theradiag. Sera samples with ADAs and undetectable levels of IFX were spiked with exogenous IFX and analyzed for ADAs. RESULTS: The three assays showed 81–96% agreement for the measured IFX level. However, the in-house assay and Immundiagnostik assays detected ADAs in 34 out of 79 samples, whereas Theradiag only detected ADAs in 24 samples. Samples negative for ADAs with Theradiag, but ADA-positive in both the in-house and Immundiagnostik assays, were positive for IFX or IgG4 ADAs. In spiking experiments, a low concentration of exogenous IFX (5 µg/ml) hampered ADA detection with Theradiag in sera samples with ADA levels of between 3 and 10 µg/ml. In the Immundiagnostik assay detection interference was only observed at concentrations of exogenous IFX higher than 30 µg/ml. However, in samples with high levels of ADAs (>25 µg/ml) interference was only observed at IFX concentrations higher than 100 µg/ml in all three assays. Binary (IFX/ADA) stratification of the results showed that IFX+/ADA- and IFX-/ADAs+ were less influenced by the assay results than the double-positive (IFX+/ADAs+) and double-negative (IFX-/ADAs-) combination. CONCLUSIONS: All three methodologies are equally suitable for measuring IFX levels. However, erroneous therapeutic decisions may occur when patients show double-negative (IFX-/ADAs-) or double-positive (IFX+/ADAs+) status, since agreement between assays is significantly lower in these circumstances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5076767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50767672016-11-02 Detection of anti-infliximab antibodies is impacted by antibody titer, infliximab level and IgG4 antibodies: a systematic comparison of three different assays Afonso, Joana Lopes, Susana Gonçalves, Raquel Caldeira, Paulo Lago, Paula Tavares de Sousa, Helena Ramos, Jaime Gonçalves, Ana Rita Ministro, Paula Rosa, Isadora Vieira, Ana Isabel Coelho, Rosa Tavares, Patrícia Soares, João Sousa, Ana Lúcia Carvalho, Diana Sousa, Paula da Silva, João Pereira Meira, Tânia Silva Ferreira, Filipa Dias, Cláudia Camila Chowers, Yehuda Ben-Horin, Shomron Magro, Fernando Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: There is scant information on the accuracy of different assays used to measure anti-infliximab antibodies (ADAs), especially in the presence of detectable infliximab (IFX). We thus aimed to evaluate and compare three different assays for the detection of IFX and ADAs and to clarify the impact of the presence of circulating IFX on the accuracy of the ADA assays. METHODS: Blood samples from 79 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients treated with infliximab were assessed for IFX levels and ADAs using three different assays: an in-house assay and two commercial kits, Immundiagnostik and Theradiag. Sera samples with ADAs and undetectable levels of IFX were spiked with exogenous IFX and analyzed for ADAs. RESULTS: The three assays showed 81–96% agreement for the measured IFX level. However, the in-house assay and Immundiagnostik assays detected ADAs in 34 out of 79 samples, whereas Theradiag only detected ADAs in 24 samples. Samples negative for ADAs with Theradiag, but ADA-positive in both the in-house and Immundiagnostik assays, were positive for IFX or IgG4 ADAs. In spiking experiments, a low concentration of exogenous IFX (5 µg/ml) hampered ADA detection with Theradiag in sera samples with ADA levels of between 3 and 10 µg/ml. In the Immundiagnostik assay detection interference was only observed at concentrations of exogenous IFX higher than 30 µg/ml. However, in samples with high levels of ADAs (>25 µg/ml) interference was only observed at IFX concentrations higher than 100 µg/ml in all three assays. Binary (IFX/ADA) stratification of the results showed that IFX+/ADA- and IFX-/ADAs+ were less influenced by the assay results than the double-positive (IFX+/ADAs+) and double-negative (IFX-/ADAs-) combination. CONCLUSIONS: All three methodologies are equally suitable for measuring IFX levels. However, erroneous therapeutic decisions may occur when patients show double-negative (IFX-/ADAs-) or double-positive (IFX+/ADAs+) status, since agreement between assays is significantly lower in these circumstances. SAGE Publications 2016-07-26 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5076767/ /pubmed/27803733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756283X16658223 Text en © The Author(s), 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Afonso, Joana Lopes, Susana Gonçalves, Raquel Caldeira, Paulo Lago, Paula Tavares de Sousa, Helena Ramos, Jaime Gonçalves, Ana Rita Ministro, Paula Rosa, Isadora Vieira, Ana Isabel Coelho, Rosa Tavares, Patrícia Soares, João Sousa, Ana Lúcia Carvalho, Diana Sousa, Paula da Silva, João Pereira Meira, Tânia Silva Ferreira, Filipa Dias, Cláudia Camila Chowers, Yehuda Ben-Horin, Shomron Magro, Fernando Detection of anti-infliximab antibodies is impacted by antibody titer, infliximab level and IgG4 antibodies: a systematic comparison of three different assays |
title | Detection of anti-infliximab antibodies is impacted by antibody titer, infliximab level and IgG4 antibodies: a systematic comparison of three different assays |
title_full | Detection of anti-infliximab antibodies is impacted by antibody titer, infliximab level and IgG4 antibodies: a systematic comparison of three different assays |
title_fullStr | Detection of anti-infliximab antibodies is impacted by antibody titer, infliximab level and IgG4 antibodies: a systematic comparison of three different assays |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of anti-infliximab antibodies is impacted by antibody titer, infliximab level and IgG4 antibodies: a systematic comparison of three different assays |
title_short | Detection of anti-infliximab antibodies is impacted by antibody titer, infliximab level and IgG4 antibodies: a systematic comparison of three different assays |
title_sort | detection of anti-infliximab antibodies is impacted by antibody titer, infliximab level and igg4 antibodies: a systematic comparison of three different assays |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5076767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27803733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756283X16658223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT afonsojoana detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT lopessusana detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT goncalvesraquel detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT caldeirapaulo detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT lagopaula detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT tavaresdesousahelena detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT ramosjaime detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT goncalvesanarita detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT ministropaula detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT rosaisadora detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT vieiraanaisabel detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT coelhorosa detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT tavarespatricia detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT soaresjoao detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT sousaanalucia detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT carvalhodiana detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT sousapaula detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT dasilvajoaopereira detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT meiratania detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT silvaferreirafilipa detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT diasclaudiacamila detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT chowersyehuda detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT benhorinshomron detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT magrofernando detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays AT detectionofantiinfliximabantibodiesisimpactedbyantibodytiterinfliximablevelandigg4antibodiesasystematiccomparisonofthreedifferentassays |