Cargando…

A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears (retracted medial to the glenoid) with Goutallier Grade 4 atrophy and concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve to a similar group of patients with Grade 3 atroph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savoie, Felix H, Zunkiewicz, Mark, Field, Larry D, Replogle, William H, O’Brien, Michael J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5077237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799834
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S113020
_version_ 1782462147344728064
author Savoie, Felix H
Zunkiewicz, Mark
Field, Larry D
Replogle, William H
O’Brien, Michael J
author_facet Savoie, Felix H
Zunkiewicz, Mark
Field, Larry D
Replogle, William H
O’Brien, Michael J
author_sort Savoie, Felix H
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears (retracted medial to the glenoid) with Goutallier Grade 4 atrophy and concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve to a similar group of patients with Grade 3 atrophy undergoing revision rotator cuff repair (RTCR) without nerve release. We hypothesized that patients undergoing nerve release would have more favorable functional outcomes as measured by the Modified University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (UCLA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears with release of the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch. We compared total preoperative, postoperative, and change in UCLA score in these patients to a similar group of 22 patients undergoing revision RTCR without suprascapular nerve release. Additionally, UCLA subscores between the two groups were compared preoperatively and at final follow-up. RESULTS: The average preoperative UCLA score in the nerve-release group was 7.91, and final follow-up average was 27.86; average 3.05 grades of strength were recovered. In the comparison group, average preoperative UCLA score was 11.77, and final follow-up average was 29.09; average 1.32 grades of strength were recovered. The average preoperative UCLA score was significantly worse in the nerve-release group (P=0.007). The average postoperative UCLA score was not significantly different (P=0.590) between the groups, indicating a better improvement in the nerve-release group with significantly greater improvement in active forward flexion, strength, and pain relief. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve during revision RTCR had greater overall improvement as noted in pain relief, active forward flexion, and strength, than a comparable group without nerve release.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5077237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50772372016-10-31 A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release Savoie, Felix H Zunkiewicz, Mark Field, Larry D Replogle, William H O’Brien, Michael J Open Access J Sports Med Original Research PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears (retracted medial to the glenoid) with Goutallier Grade 4 atrophy and concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve to a similar group of patients with Grade 3 atrophy undergoing revision rotator cuff repair (RTCR) without nerve release. We hypothesized that patients undergoing nerve release would have more favorable functional outcomes as measured by the Modified University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (UCLA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears with release of the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch. We compared total preoperative, postoperative, and change in UCLA score in these patients to a similar group of 22 patients undergoing revision RTCR without suprascapular nerve release. Additionally, UCLA subscores between the two groups were compared preoperatively and at final follow-up. RESULTS: The average preoperative UCLA score in the nerve-release group was 7.91, and final follow-up average was 27.86; average 3.05 grades of strength were recovered. In the comparison group, average preoperative UCLA score was 11.77, and final follow-up average was 29.09; average 1.32 grades of strength were recovered. The average preoperative UCLA score was significantly worse in the nerve-release group (P=0.007). The average postoperative UCLA score was not significantly different (P=0.590) between the groups, indicating a better improvement in the nerve-release group with significantly greater improvement in active forward flexion, strength, and pain relief. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve during revision RTCR had greater overall improvement as noted in pain relief, active forward flexion, and strength, than a comparable group without nerve release. Dove Medical Press 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5077237/ /pubmed/27799834 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S113020 Text en © 2016 Savoie III et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Savoie, Felix H
Zunkiewicz, Mark
Field, Larry D
Replogle, William H
O’Brien, Michael J
A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release
title A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release
title_full A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release
title_fullStr A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release
title_short A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release
title_sort comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5077237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799834
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S113020
work_keys_str_mv AT savoiefelixh acomparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease
AT zunkiewiczmark acomparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease
AT fieldlarryd acomparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease
AT reploglewilliamh acomparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease
AT obrienmichaelj acomparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease
AT savoiefelixh comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease
AT zunkiewiczmark comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease
AT fieldlarryd comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease
AT reploglewilliamh comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease
AT obrienmichaelj comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease