Cargando…
A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release
PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears (retracted medial to the glenoid) with Goutallier Grade 4 atrophy and concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve to a similar group of patients with Grade 3 atroph...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5077237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799834 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S113020 |
_version_ | 1782462147344728064 |
---|---|
author | Savoie, Felix H Zunkiewicz, Mark Field, Larry D Replogle, William H O’Brien, Michael J |
author_facet | Savoie, Felix H Zunkiewicz, Mark Field, Larry D Replogle, William H O’Brien, Michael J |
author_sort | Savoie, Felix H |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears (retracted medial to the glenoid) with Goutallier Grade 4 atrophy and concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve to a similar group of patients with Grade 3 atrophy undergoing revision rotator cuff repair (RTCR) without nerve release. We hypothesized that patients undergoing nerve release would have more favorable functional outcomes as measured by the Modified University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (UCLA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears with release of the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch. We compared total preoperative, postoperative, and change in UCLA score in these patients to a similar group of 22 patients undergoing revision RTCR without suprascapular nerve release. Additionally, UCLA subscores between the two groups were compared preoperatively and at final follow-up. RESULTS: The average preoperative UCLA score in the nerve-release group was 7.91, and final follow-up average was 27.86; average 3.05 grades of strength were recovered. In the comparison group, average preoperative UCLA score was 11.77, and final follow-up average was 29.09; average 1.32 grades of strength were recovered. The average preoperative UCLA score was significantly worse in the nerve-release group (P=0.007). The average postoperative UCLA score was not significantly different (P=0.590) between the groups, indicating a better improvement in the nerve-release group with significantly greater improvement in active forward flexion, strength, and pain relief. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve during revision RTCR had greater overall improvement as noted in pain relief, active forward flexion, and strength, than a comparable group without nerve release. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5077237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50772372016-10-31 A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release Savoie, Felix H Zunkiewicz, Mark Field, Larry D Replogle, William H O’Brien, Michael J Open Access J Sports Med Original Research PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears (retracted medial to the glenoid) with Goutallier Grade 4 atrophy and concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve to a similar group of patients with Grade 3 atrophy undergoing revision rotator cuff repair (RTCR) without nerve release. We hypothesized that patients undergoing nerve release would have more favorable functional outcomes as measured by the Modified University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (UCLA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears with release of the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch. We compared total preoperative, postoperative, and change in UCLA score in these patients to a similar group of 22 patients undergoing revision RTCR without suprascapular nerve release. Additionally, UCLA subscores between the two groups were compared preoperatively and at final follow-up. RESULTS: The average preoperative UCLA score in the nerve-release group was 7.91, and final follow-up average was 27.86; average 3.05 grades of strength were recovered. In the comparison group, average preoperative UCLA score was 11.77, and final follow-up average was 29.09; average 1.32 grades of strength were recovered. The average preoperative UCLA score was significantly worse in the nerve-release group (P=0.007). The average postoperative UCLA score was not significantly different (P=0.590) between the groups, indicating a better improvement in the nerve-release group with significantly greater improvement in active forward flexion, strength, and pain relief. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve during revision RTCR had greater overall improvement as noted in pain relief, active forward flexion, and strength, than a comparable group without nerve release. Dove Medical Press 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5077237/ /pubmed/27799834 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S113020 Text en © 2016 Savoie III et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Savoie, Felix H Zunkiewicz, Mark Field, Larry D Replogle, William H O’Brien, Michael J A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release |
title | A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release |
title_full | A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release |
title_fullStr | A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release |
title_short | A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release |
title_sort | comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5077237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799834 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S113020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT savoiefelixh acomparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease AT zunkiewiczmark acomparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease AT fieldlarryd acomparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease AT reploglewilliamh acomparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease AT obrienmichaelj acomparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease AT savoiefelixh comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease AT zunkiewiczmark comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease AT fieldlarryd comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease AT reploglewilliamh comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease AT obrienmichaelj comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingrevisionarthroscopicrepairofmassiverotatorcufftearswithandwithoutarthroscopicsuprascapularnerverelease |