Cargando…

Validation of a Russian Language Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire

Study Design Retrospective reliability and validity study. Objective To validate a recently translated Russian language version of the Oswestry Disability Index (R-ODI) using standardized methods detailed from previous validations in other languages. Methods We included all subjects who were seen in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Elizabeth M., Nosova, Emily V., Falkenstein, Yuri, Prasad, Priya, Leasure, Jeremi M., Kondrashov, Dimitriy G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5077720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27781182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570085
_version_ 1782462226870829056
author Yu, Elizabeth M.
Nosova, Emily V.
Falkenstein, Yuri
Prasad, Priya
Leasure, Jeremi M.
Kondrashov, Dimitriy G.
author_facet Yu, Elizabeth M.
Nosova, Emily V.
Falkenstein, Yuri
Prasad, Priya
Leasure, Jeremi M.
Kondrashov, Dimitriy G.
author_sort Yu, Elizabeth M.
collection PubMed
description Study Design Retrospective reliability and validity study. Objective To validate a recently translated Russian language version of the Oswestry Disability Index (R-ODI) using standardized methods detailed from previous validations in other languages. Methods We included all subjects who were seen in our spine surgery clinic, over the age of 18, and fluent in the Russian language. R-ODI was translated by six bilingual people and combined into a consensus version. R-ODI and visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires for leg and back pain were distributed to subjects during both their initial and follow-up visits. Test validity, stability, and internal consistency were measured using standardized psychometric methods. Results Ninety-seven subjects participated in the study. No change in the meaning of the questions on R-ODI was noted with translation from English to Russian. There was a significant positive correlation between R-ODI and VAS scores for both the leg and back during both the initial and follow-up visits (p < 0.01 for all). The instrument was shown to have high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.82) and moderate test–retest stability (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.70). Conclusions The R-ODI is both valid and reliable for use among the Russian-speaking population in the United States.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5077720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50777202016-11-01 Validation of a Russian Language Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire Yu, Elizabeth M. Nosova, Emily V. Falkenstein, Yuri Prasad, Priya Leasure, Jeremi M. Kondrashov, Dimitriy G. Global Spine J Study Design Retrospective reliability and validity study. Objective To validate a recently translated Russian language version of the Oswestry Disability Index (R-ODI) using standardized methods detailed from previous validations in other languages. Methods We included all subjects who were seen in our spine surgery clinic, over the age of 18, and fluent in the Russian language. R-ODI was translated by six bilingual people and combined into a consensus version. R-ODI and visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires for leg and back pain were distributed to subjects during both their initial and follow-up visits. Test validity, stability, and internal consistency were measured using standardized psychometric methods. Results Ninety-seven subjects participated in the study. No change in the meaning of the questions on R-ODI was noted with translation from English to Russian. There was a significant positive correlation between R-ODI and VAS scores for both the leg and back during both the initial and follow-up visits (p < 0.01 for all). The instrument was shown to have high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.82) and moderate test–retest stability (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.70). Conclusions The R-ODI is both valid and reliable for use among the Russian-speaking population in the United States. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015-12-15 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5077720/ /pubmed/27781182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570085 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Yu, Elizabeth M.
Nosova, Emily V.
Falkenstein, Yuri
Prasad, Priya
Leasure, Jeremi M.
Kondrashov, Dimitriy G.
Validation of a Russian Language Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire
title Validation of a Russian Language Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire
title_full Validation of a Russian Language Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire
title_fullStr Validation of a Russian Language Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a Russian Language Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire
title_short Validation of a Russian Language Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire
title_sort validation of a russian language oswestry disability index questionnaire
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5077720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27781182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570085
work_keys_str_mv AT yuelizabethm validationofarussianlanguageoswestrydisabilityindexquestionnaire
AT nosovaemilyv validationofarussianlanguageoswestrydisabilityindexquestionnaire
AT falkensteinyuri validationofarussianlanguageoswestrydisabilityindexquestionnaire
AT prasadpriya validationofarussianlanguageoswestrydisabilityindexquestionnaire
AT leasurejeremim validationofarussianlanguageoswestrydisabilityindexquestionnaire
AT kondrashovdimitriyg validationofarussianlanguageoswestrydisabilityindexquestionnaire