Cargando…

Prognostic role of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio for patients with cancer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis

Inflammation influences cancer development and progression, and a low lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) has been reported to be a poor prognostic indicator in several malignancies. Here we quantify the prognostic impact of this biomarker and assess its consistency in various cancers. Eligible studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Liangyou, Li, Hongzhao, Chen, Luyao, Ma, Xin, Li, Xintao, Gao, Yu, Zhang, Yu, Xie, Yongpeng, Zhang, Xu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5077986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942464
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7876
_version_ 1782462282516660224
author Gu, Liangyou
Li, Hongzhao
Chen, Luyao
Ma, Xin
Li, Xintao
Gao, Yu
Zhang, Yu
Xie, Yongpeng
Zhang, Xu
author_facet Gu, Liangyou
Li, Hongzhao
Chen, Luyao
Ma, Xin
Li, Xintao
Gao, Yu
Zhang, Yu
Xie, Yongpeng
Zhang, Xu
author_sort Gu, Liangyou
collection PubMed
description Inflammation influences cancer development and progression, and a low lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) has been reported to be a poor prognostic indicator in several malignancies. Here we quantify the prognostic impact of this biomarker and assess its consistency in various cancers. Eligible studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome, cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary outcomes. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Fifty-six studies comprising 20,248 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, decreased LMR was significantly associated with shorter OS in non-hematological malignancy (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.53–0.66; P < 0.001) and hematological malignancy (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.34–0.56; P < 0.001). Similar results were found in CSS, DFS, RFS and PFS. Moreover, low LMR was significantly associated with some clinicopathological characteristics that are indicative of poor prognosis and disease aggressiveness. By these results, we conclude that a decreased LMR implied poor prognosis in patients with cancer and could serve as a readily available and inexpensive biomarker for clinical decision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5077986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50779862016-10-28 Prognostic role of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio for patients with cancer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis Gu, Liangyou Li, Hongzhao Chen, Luyao Ma, Xin Li, Xintao Gao, Yu Zhang, Yu Xie, Yongpeng Zhang, Xu Oncotarget Research Paper Inflammation influences cancer development and progression, and a low lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) has been reported to be a poor prognostic indicator in several malignancies. Here we quantify the prognostic impact of this biomarker and assess its consistency in various cancers. Eligible studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome, cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary outcomes. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Fifty-six studies comprising 20,248 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, decreased LMR was significantly associated with shorter OS in non-hematological malignancy (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.53–0.66; P < 0.001) and hematological malignancy (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.34–0.56; P < 0.001). Similar results were found in CSS, DFS, RFS and PFS. Moreover, low LMR was significantly associated with some clinicopathological characteristics that are indicative of poor prognosis and disease aggressiveness. By these results, we conclude that a decreased LMR implied poor prognosis in patients with cancer and could serve as a readily available and inexpensive biomarker for clinical decision. Impact Journals LLC 2016-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5077986/ /pubmed/26942464 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7876 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Gu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Gu, Liangyou
Li, Hongzhao
Chen, Luyao
Ma, Xin
Li, Xintao
Gao, Yu
Zhang, Yu
Xie, Yongpeng
Zhang, Xu
Prognostic role of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio for patients with cancer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prognostic role of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio for patients with cancer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prognostic role of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio for patients with cancer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic role of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio for patients with cancer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic role of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio for patients with cancer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prognostic role of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio for patients with cancer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prognostic role of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio for patients with cancer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5077986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942464
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7876
work_keys_str_mv AT guliangyou prognosticroleoflymphocytetomonocyteratioforpatientswithcancerevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihongzhao prognosticroleoflymphocytetomonocyteratioforpatientswithcancerevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenluyao prognosticroleoflymphocytetomonocyteratioforpatientswithcancerevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maxin prognosticroleoflymphocytetomonocyteratioforpatientswithcancerevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lixintao prognosticroleoflymphocytetomonocyteratioforpatientswithcancerevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaoyu prognosticroleoflymphocytetomonocyteratioforpatientswithcancerevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyu prognosticroleoflymphocytetomonocyteratioforpatientswithcancerevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xieyongpeng prognosticroleoflymphocytetomonocyteratioforpatientswithcancerevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangxu prognosticroleoflymphocytetomonocyteratioforpatientswithcancerevidencefromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis