Cargando…
Failed septal extension graft in a patient with a history of radiotherapy
BACKGROUND: This report describes the authors’ experience of “melting” septal cartilage after placement of a septal extension graft in a nasopharyngeal cancer patient that had been previously undergone radiation therapy, and provides a review of the literature. METHODS: Electronic medical records we...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5078155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27830140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0086-9 |
_version_ | 1782462325947629568 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Il Gyu Kim, Seon Tae Lee, Seok Ho Baek, Min Kwan |
author_facet | Kang, Il Gyu Kim, Seon Tae Lee, Seok Ho Baek, Min Kwan |
author_sort | Kang, Il Gyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This report describes the authors’ experience of “melting” septal cartilage after placement of a septal extension graft in a nasopharyngeal cancer patient that had been previously undergone radiation therapy, and provides a review of the literature. METHODS: Electronic medical records were used to obtain details of the patient’s clinical history. RESULTS: A 32-year-old woman, who had previously undergone radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer, visited our department to for rhinoplasty. Rhinoplasty was performed using a septal extension graft to raise the nasal tip (first operation). Five days after surgery, it was found that the septal extension graft was melting without any signs of infection, that is, the graft had softened, lost elasticity, thinned, and partially disappeared without any sign of infection at 5 days, and thus, the nasal tip was reconstructed with conchal cartilage (second operation). Five months after surgery, it was found that almost all septal cartilage had disappeared without any sign of infection, and thus, the entire nasal septum was reconstructed using 2-mm costal cartilage and an onlay graft was used for tip augmentation (third operation). CONCLUSIONS: After cartilage has been exposed to radiotherapy, its patency should be viewed with suspicion. Further studies are needed for determine the mechanism responsible for cartilage damage after radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5078155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50781552016-11-07 Failed septal extension graft in a patient with a history of radiotherapy Kang, Il Gyu Kim, Seon Tae Lee, Seok Ho Baek, Min Kwan Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Case Report BACKGROUND: This report describes the authors’ experience of “melting” septal cartilage after placement of a septal extension graft in a nasopharyngeal cancer patient that had been previously undergone radiation therapy, and provides a review of the literature. METHODS: Electronic medical records were used to obtain details of the patient’s clinical history. RESULTS: A 32-year-old woman, who had previously undergone radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer, visited our department to for rhinoplasty. Rhinoplasty was performed using a septal extension graft to raise the nasal tip (first operation). Five days after surgery, it was found that the septal extension graft was melting without any signs of infection, that is, the graft had softened, lost elasticity, thinned, and partially disappeared without any sign of infection at 5 days, and thus, the nasal tip was reconstructed with conchal cartilage (second operation). Five months after surgery, it was found that almost all septal cartilage had disappeared without any sign of infection, and thus, the entire nasal septum was reconstructed using 2-mm costal cartilage and an onlay graft was used for tip augmentation (third operation). CONCLUSIONS: After cartilage has been exposed to radiotherapy, its patency should be viewed with suspicion. Further studies are needed for determine the mechanism responsible for cartilage damage after radiotherapy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5078155/ /pubmed/27830140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0086-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Kang, Il Gyu Kim, Seon Tae Lee, Seok Ho Baek, Min Kwan Failed septal extension graft in a patient with a history of radiotherapy |
title | Failed septal extension graft in a patient with a history of radiotherapy |
title_full | Failed septal extension graft in a patient with a history of radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Failed septal extension graft in a patient with a history of radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Failed septal extension graft in a patient with a history of radiotherapy |
title_short | Failed septal extension graft in a patient with a history of radiotherapy |
title_sort | failed septal extension graft in a patient with a history of radiotherapy |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5078155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27830140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0086-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangilgyu failedseptalextensiongraftinapatientwithahistoryofradiotherapy AT kimseontae failedseptalextensiongraftinapatientwithahistoryofradiotherapy AT leeseokho failedseptalextensiongraftinapatientwithahistoryofradiotherapy AT baekminkwan failedseptalextensiongraftinapatientwithahistoryofradiotherapy |