Cargando…
Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency
BACKGROUND: The study compared downstream coronary and conduit disease progression in the left anterior descending coronary artery treated with coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) versus percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent (BMS) or drug...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003568 |
_version_ | 1782462499490103296 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Ming Guddeti, Raviteja R. Matsuzawa, Yasushi Sara, Jaskanwal D.S. Kwon, Taek‐Geun Liu, Zhi Sun, Tao Lee, Seung‐Jin Lennon, Ryan J. Bell, Malcolm R. Schaff, Hartzell V. Daly, Richard C. Lerman, Lilach O. Lerman, Amir Locker, Chaim |
author_facet | Zhang, Ming Guddeti, Raviteja R. Matsuzawa, Yasushi Sara, Jaskanwal D.S. Kwon, Taek‐Geun Liu, Zhi Sun, Tao Lee, Seung‐Jin Lennon, Ryan J. Bell, Malcolm R. Schaff, Hartzell V. Daly, Richard C. Lerman, Lilach O. Lerman, Amir Locker, Chaim |
author_sort | Zhang, Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study compared downstream coronary and conduit disease progression in the left anterior descending coronary artery treated with coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) versus percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent (BMS) or drug eluting stent (DES). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 12 301 consecutive patients underwent isolated primary coronary revascularization, of which 2386 met our inclusion criteria (Percutaneous coronary intervention, n=1450; coronary artery bypass grafting, n=936). Propensity score analysis matched 628 patients, of which 468 were treated to the left anterior descending with coronary artery bypass grafting with LIMA (n=314), percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS (n=94), and DES (n=60). Coronary angiograms were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA; n=433). Cumulative downstream coronary and conduit disease progression were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and effect of treatment type by Cox proportional hazard models. Patients treated with LIMA had significantly lower risk of downstream coronary disease progression at follow‐up angiogram compared with BMS and DES (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.34; [0.20–0.59]; P=0.0002; and HR [95% CI], 0.39; [0.20–0.79]; P=0.01, respectively). LIMA was associated with a lower risk of conduit disease progression compared to BMS and DES (HR [95% CI], 0.18; [0.12–0.28]; P<0.001; and HR [95% CI], 0.27; [0.16–0.46]; P<0.001, respectively). BMS was associated with higher HR for downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared with DES, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR [95% CI], 1.13; [0.57–2.36]; P=0.73; and HR [95% CI], 1.46; [0.88–2.50]; P=0.14, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LIMA grafting to left anterior descending is associated with significantly lower risk of downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared to percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS and DES. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5079021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50790212016-10-28 Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency Zhang, Ming Guddeti, Raviteja R. Matsuzawa, Yasushi Sara, Jaskanwal D.S. Kwon, Taek‐Geun Liu, Zhi Sun, Tao Lee, Seung‐Jin Lennon, Ryan J. Bell, Malcolm R. Schaff, Hartzell V. Daly, Richard C. Lerman, Lilach O. Lerman, Amir Locker, Chaim J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The study compared downstream coronary and conduit disease progression in the left anterior descending coronary artery treated with coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) versus percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent (BMS) or drug eluting stent (DES). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 12 301 consecutive patients underwent isolated primary coronary revascularization, of which 2386 met our inclusion criteria (Percutaneous coronary intervention, n=1450; coronary artery bypass grafting, n=936). Propensity score analysis matched 628 patients, of which 468 were treated to the left anterior descending with coronary artery bypass grafting with LIMA (n=314), percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS (n=94), and DES (n=60). Coronary angiograms were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA; n=433). Cumulative downstream coronary and conduit disease progression were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and effect of treatment type by Cox proportional hazard models. Patients treated with LIMA had significantly lower risk of downstream coronary disease progression at follow‐up angiogram compared with BMS and DES (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.34; [0.20–0.59]; P=0.0002; and HR [95% CI], 0.39; [0.20–0.79]; P=0.01, respectively). LIMA was associated with a lower risk of conduit disease progression compared to BMS and DES (HR [95% CI], 0.18; [0.12–0.28]; P<0.001; and HR [95% CI], 0.27; [0.16–0.46]; P<0.001, respectively). BMS was associated with higher HR for downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared with DES, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR [95% CI], 1.13; [0.57–2.36]; P=0.73; and HR [95% CI], 1.46; [0.88–2.50]; P=0.14, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LIMA grafting to left anterior descending is associated with significantly lower risk of downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared to percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS and DES. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5079021/ /pubmed/27664803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003568 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zhang, Ming Guddeti, Raviteja R. Matsuzawa, Yasushi Sara, Jaskanwal D.S. Kwon, Taek‐Geun Liu, Zhi Sun, Tao Lee, Seung‐Jin Lennon, Ryan J. Bell, Malcolm R. Schaff, Hartzell V. Daly, Richard C. Lerman, Lilach O. Lerman, Amir Locker, Chaim Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency |
title | Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency |
title_full | Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency |
title_fullStr | Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency |
title_full_unstemmed | Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency |
title_short | Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency |
title_sort | left internal mammary artery versus coronary stents: impact on downstream coronary stenoses and conduit patency |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangming leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT guddetiravitejar leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT matsuzawayasushi leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT sarajaskanwalds leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT kwontaekgeun leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT liuzhi leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT suntao leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT leeseungjin leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT lennonryanj leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT bellmalcolmr leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT schaffhartzellv leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT dalyrichardc leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT lermanlilacho leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT lermanamir leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency AT lockerchaim leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency |