Cargando…

Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency

BACKGROUND: The study compared downstream coronary and conduit disease progression in the left anterior descending coronary artery treated with coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) versus percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent (BMS) or drug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ming, Guddeti, Raviteja R., Matsuzawa, Yasushi, Sara, Jaskanwal D.S., Kwon, Taek‐Geun, Liu, Zhi, Sun, Tao, Lee, Seung‐Jin, Lennon, Ryan J., Bell, Malcolm R., Schaff, Hartzell V., Daly, Richard C., Lerman, Lilach O., Lerman, Amir, Locker, Chaim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003568
_version_ 1782462499490103296
author Zhang, Ming
Guddeti, Raviteja R.
Matsuzawa, Yasushi
Sara, Jaskanwal D.S.
Kwon, Taek‐Geun
Liu, Zhi
Sun, Tao
Lee, Seung‐Jin
Lennon, Ryan J.
Bell, Malcolm R.
Schaff, Hartzell V.
Daly, Richard C.
Lerman, Lilach O.
Lerman, Amir
Locker, Chaim
author_facet Zhang, Ming
Guddeti, Raviteja R.
Matsuzawa, Yasushi
Sara, Jaskanwal D.S.
Kwon, Taek‐Geun
Liu, Zhi
Sun, Tao
Lee, Seung‐Jin
Lennon, Ryan J.
Bell, Malcolm R.
Schaff, Hartzell V.
Daly, Richard C.
Lerman, Lilach O.
Lerman, Amir
Locker, Chaim
author_sort Zhang, Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study compared downstream coronary and conduit disease progression in the left anterior descending coronary artery treated with coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) versus percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent (BMS) or drug eluting stent (DES). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 12 301 consecutive patients underwent isolated primary coronary revascularization, of which 2386 met our inclusion criteria (Percutaneous coronary intervention, n=1450; coronary artery bypass grafting, n=936). Propensity score analysis matched 628 patients, of which 468 were treated to the left anterior descending with coronary artery bypass grafting with LIMA (n=314), percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS (n=94), and DES (n=60). Coronary angiograms were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA; n=433). Cumulative downstream coronary and conduit disease progression were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and effect of treatment type by Cox proportional hazard models. Patients treated with LIMA had significantly lower risk of downstream coronary disease progression at follow‐up angiogram compared with BMS and DES (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.34; [0.20–0.59]; P=0.0002; and HR [95% CI], 0.39; [0.20–0.79]; P=0.01, respectively). LIMA was associated with a lower risk of conduit disease progression compared to BMS and DES (HR [95% CI], 0.18; [0.12–0.28]; P<0.001; and HR [95% CI], 0.27; [0.16–0.46]; P<0.001, respectively). BMS was associated with higher HR for downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared with DES, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR [95% CI], 1.13; [0.57–2.36]; P=0.73; and HR [95% CI], 1.46; [0.88–2.50]; P=0.14, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LIMA grafting to left anterior descending is associated with significantly lower risk of downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared to percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS and DES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5079021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50790212016-10-28 Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency Zhang, Ming Guddeti, Raviteja R. Matsuzawa, Yasushi Sara, Jaskanwal D.S. Kwon, Taek‐Geun Liu, Zhi Sun, Tao Lee, Seung‐Jin Lennon, Ryan J. Bell, Malcolm R. Schaff, Hartzell V. Daly, Richard C. Lerman, Lilach O. Lerman, Amir Locker, Chaim J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The study compared downstream coronary and conduit disease progression in the left anterior descending coronary artery treated with coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) versus percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent (BMS) or drug eluting stent (DES). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 12 301 consecutive patients underwent isolated primary coronary revascularization, of which 2386 met our inclusion criteria (Percutaneous coronary intervention, n=1450; coronary artery bypass grafting, n=936). Propensity score analysis matched 628 patients, of which 468 were treated to the left anterior descending with coronary artery bypass grafting with LIMA (n=314), percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS (n=94), and DES (n=60). Coronary angiograms were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA; n=433). Cumulative downstream coronary and conduit disease progression were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and effect of treatment type by Cox proportional hazard models. Patients treated with LIMA had significantly lower risk of downstream coronary disease progression at follow‐up angiogram compared with BMS and DES (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.34; [0.20–0.59]; P=0.0002; and HR [95% CI], 0.39; [0.20–0.79]; P=0.01, respectively). LIMA was associated with a lower risk of conduit disease progression compared to BMS and DES (HR [95% CI], 0.18; [0.12–0.28]; P<0.001; and HR [95% CI], 0.27; [0.16–0.46]; P<0.001, respectively). BMS was associated with higher HR for downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared with DES, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR [95% CI], 1.13; [0.57–2.36]; P=0.73; and HR [95% CI], 1.46; [0.88–2.50]; P=0.14, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LIMA grafting to left anterior descending is associated with significantly lower risk of downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared to percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS and DES. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5079021/ /pubmed/27664803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003568 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhang, Ming
Guddeti, Raviteja R.
Matsuzawa, Yasushi
Sara, Jaskanwal D.S.
Kwon, Taek‐Geun
Liu, Zhi
Sun, Tao
Lee, Seung‐Jin
Lennon, Ryan J.
Bell, Malcolm R.
Schaff, Hartzell V.
Daly, Richard C.
Lerman, Lilach O.
Lerman, Amir
Locker, Chaim
Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency
title Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency
title_full Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency
title_fullStr Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency
title_full_unstemmed Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency
title_short Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency
title_sort left internal mammary artery versus coronary stents: impact on downstream coronary stenoses and conduit patency
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003568
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangming leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT guddetiravitejar leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT matsuzawayasushi leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT sarajaskanwalds leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT kwontaekgeun leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT liuzhi leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT suntao leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT leeseungjin leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT lennonryanj leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT bellmalcolmr leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT schaffhartzellv leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT dalyrichardc leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT lermanlilacho leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT lermanamir leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency
AT lockerchaim leftinternalmammaryarteryversuscoronarystentsimpactondownstreamcoronarystenosesandconduitpatency