Cargando…

Oral antiplatelet therapy and platelet inhibition: An experience from a tertiary care center

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Although clopidogrel combined with aspirin is the most commonly used dual drug combination to avert thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease, the poor responsiveness to clopidogrel remains a concern. The objective of the current study is to assess the extent of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalal, Jamshed J., Digrajkar, Aarti, Gandhi, Alap
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27773400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2015.12.022
_version_ 1782462521237569536
author Dalal, Jamshed J.
Digrajkar, Aarti
Gandhi, Alap
author_facet Dalal, Jamshed J.
Digrajkar, Aarti
Gandhi, Alap
author_sort Dalal, Jamshed J.
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Although clopidogrel combined with aspirin is the most commonly used dual drug combination to avert thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease, the poor responsiveness to clopidogrel remains a concern. The objective of the current study is to assess the extent of resistance to clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor in a real life set of patients with coronary artery disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 539 patients, who underwent PCI and were on aspirin and on any of the three drugs, namely, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor, were followed up regularly in the outpatient department. After 24 h of initiation of antiplatelet medication, response to the treatment in all the patients was assessed using thrombelastography. The average percentage platelet inhibition was assessed along with the resistance and sensitivity to the drug in each patient. Sensitivity and resistance to the specific drug was defined as >50% and <50% of mean platelet inhibition, respectively. RESULTS: About 99.15% of the patients treated with ticagrelor were sensitive to the drug and the difference between ticagrelor, clopidogrel, and prasugrel groups for sensitivity was significant with a p value of 0.00001, in favor of ticagrelor. It was also found that ticagrelor was significantly (p value of 0.001) associated with least resistance as compared with the other drugs assessed in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ticagrelor as dual therapy along with aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and undergoing PCI was associated with a significantly higher mean percentage platelet inhibition, higher sensitivity, and lower resistance as compared with the usage of clopidogrel or prasugrel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5079129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50791292017-09-01 Oral antiplatelet therapy and platelet inhibition: An experience from a tertiary care center Dalal, Jamshed J. Digrajkar, Aarti Gandhi, Alap Indian Heart J Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Although clopidogrel combined with aspirin is the most commonly used dual drug combination to avert thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease, the poor responsiveness to clopidogrel remains a concern. The objective of the current study is to assess the extent of resistance to clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor in a real life set of patients with coronary artery disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 539 patients, who underwent PCI and were on aspirin and on any of the three drugs, namely, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor, were followed up regularly in the outpatient department. After 24 h of initiation of antiplatelet medication, response to the treatment in all the patients was assessed using thrombelastography. The average percentage platelet inhibition was assessed along with the resistance and sensitivity to the drug in each patient. Sensitivity and resistance to the specific drug was defined as >50% and <50% of mean platelet inhibition, respectively. RESULTS: About 99.15% of the patients treated with ticagrelor were sensitive to the drug and the difference between ticagrelor, clopidogrel, and prasugrel groups for sensitivity was significant with a p value of 0.00001, in favor of ticagrelor. It was also found that ticagrelor was significantly (p value of 0.001) associated with least resistance as compared with the other drugs assessed in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ticagrelor as dual therapy along with aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and undergoing PCI was associated with a significantly higher mean percentage platelet inhibition, higher sensitivity, and lower resistance as compared with the usage of clopidogrel or prasugrel. Elsevier 2016 2016-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5079129/ /pubmed/27773400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2015.12.022 Text en © 2015 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Dalal, Jamshed J.
Digrajkar, Aarti
Gandhi, Alap
Oral antiplatelet therapy and platelet inhibition: An experience from a tertiary care center
title Oral antiplatelet therapy and platelet inhibition: An experience from a tertiary care center
title_full Oral antiplatelet therapy and platelet inhibition: An experience from a tertiary care center
title_fullStr Oral antiplatelet therapy and platelet inhibition: An experience from a tertiary care center
title_full_unstemmed Oral antiplatelet therapy and platelet inhibition: An experience from a tertiary care center
title_short Oral antiplatelet therapy and platelet inhibition: An experience from a tertiary care center
title_sort oral antiplatelet therapy and platelet inhibition: an experience from a tertiary care center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27773400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2015.12.022
work_keys_str_mv AT dalaljamshedj oralantiplatelettherapyandplateletinhibitionanexperiencefromatertiarycarecenter
AT digrajkaraarti oralantiplatelettherapyandplateletinhibitionanexperiencefromatertiarycarecenter
AT gandhialap oralantiplatelettherapyandplateletinhibitionanexperiencefromatertiarycarecenter