Cargando…

Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI

Tumor segmentation is a particularly challenging task in high-grade gliomas (HGGs), as they are among the most heterogeneous tumors in oncology. An accurate delineation of the lesion and its main subcomponents contributes to optimal treatment planning, prognosis and follow-up. Conventional MRI (cMRI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sauwen, N., Acou, M., Van Cauter, S., Sima, D.M., Veraart, J., Maes, F., Himmelreich, U., Achten, E., Van Huffel, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.09.021
_version_ 1782462550571483136
author Sauwen, N.
Acou, M.
Van Cauter, S.
Sima, D.M.
Veraart, J.
Maes, F.
Himmelreich, U.
Achten, E.
Van Huffel, S.
author_facet Sauwen, N.
Acou, M.
Van Cauter, S.
Sima, D.M.
Veraart, J.
Maes, F.
Himmelreich, U.
Achten, E.
Van Huffel, S.
author_sort Sauwen, N.
collection PubMed
description Tumor segmentation is a particularly challenging task in high-grade gliomas (HGGs), as they are among the most heterogeneous tumors in oncology. An accurate delineation of the lesion and its main subcomponents contributes to optimal treatment planning, prognosis and follow-up. Conventional MRI (cMRI) is the imaging modality of choice for manual segmentation, and is also considered in the vast majority of automated segmentation studies. Advanced MRI modalities such as perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) have already shown their added value in tumor tissue characterization, hence there have been recent suggestions of combining different MRI modalities into a multi-parametric MRI (MP-MRI) approach for brain tumor segmentation. In this paper, we compare the performance of several unsupervised classification methods for HGG segmentation based on MP-MRI data including cMRI, DWI, MRSI and PWI. Two independent MP-MRI datasets with a different acquisition protocol were available from different hospitals. We demonstrate that a hierarchical non-negative matrix factorization variant which was previously introduced for MP-MRI tumor segmentation gives the best performance in terms of mean Dice-scores for the pathologic tissue classes on both datasets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5079350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50793502016-11-03 Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI Sauwen, N. Acou, M. Van Cauter, S. Sima, D.M. Veraart, J. Maes, F. Himmelreich, U. Achten, E. Van Huffel, S. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Tumor segmentation is a particularly challenging task in high-grade gliomas (HGGs), as they are among the most heterogeneous tumors in oncology. An accurate delineation of the lesion and its main subcomponents contributes to optimal treatment planning, prognosis and follow-up. Conventional MRI (cMRI) is the imaging modality of choice for manual segmentation, and is also considered in the vast majority of automated segmentation studies. Advanced MRI modalities such as perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) have already shown their added value in tumor tissue characterization, hence there have been recent suggestions of combining different MRI modalities into a multi-parametric MRI (MP-MRI) approach for brain tumor segmentation. In this paper, we compare the performance of several unsupervised classification methods for HGG segmentation based on MP-MRI data including cMRI, DWI, MRSI and PWI. Two independent MP-MRI datasets with a different acquisition protocol were available from different hospitals. We demonstrate that a hierarchical non-negative matrix factorization variant which was previously introduced for MP-MRI tumor segmentation gives the best performance in terms of mean Dice-scores for the pathologic tissue classes on both datasets. Elsevier 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5079350/ /pubmed/27812502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.09.021 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Sauwen, N.
Acou, M.
Van Cauter, S.
Sima, D.M.
Veraart, J.
Maes, F.
Himmelreich, U.
Achten, E.
Van Huffel, S.
Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI
title Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI
title_full Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI
title_fullStr Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI
title_short Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI
title_sort comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric mri
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.09.021
work_keys_str_mv AT sauwenn comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri
AT acoum comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri
AT vancauters comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri
AT simadm comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri
AT veraartj comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri
AT maesf comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri
AT himmelreichu comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri
AT achtene comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri
AT vanhuffels comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri