Cargando…
Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI
Tumor segmentation is a particularly challenging task in high-grade gliomas (HGGs), as they are among the most heterogeneous tumors in oncology. An accurate delineation of the lesion and its main subcomponents contributes to optimal treatment planning, prognosis and follow-up. Conventional MRI (cMRI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.09.021 |
_version_ | 1782462550571483136 |
---|---|
author | Sauwen, N. Acou, M. Van Cauter, S. Sima, D.M. Veraart, J. Maes, F. Himmelreich, U. Achten, E. Van Huffel, S. |
author_facet | Sauwen, N. Acou, M. Van Cauter, S. Sima, D.M. Veraart, J. Maes, F. Himmelreich, U. Achten, E. Van Huffel, S. |
author_sort | Sauwen, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tumor segmentation is a particularly challenging task in high-grade gliomas (HGGs), as they are among the most heterogeneous tumors in oncology. An accurate delineation of the lesion and its main subcomponents contributes to optimal treatment planning, prognosis and follow-up. Conventional MRI (cMRI) is the imaging modality of choice for manual segmentation, and is also considered in the vast majority of automated segmentation studies. Advanced MRI modalities such as perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) have already shown their added value in tumor tissue characterization, hence there have been recent suggestions of combining different MRI modalities into a multi-parametric MRI (MP-MRI) approach for brain tumor segmentation. In this paper, we compare the performance of several unsupervised classification methods for HGG segmentation based on MP-MRI data including cMRI, DWI, MRSI and PWI. Two independent MP-MRI datasets with a different acquisition protocol were available from different hospitals. We demonstrate that a hierarchical non-negative matrix factorization variant which was previously introduced for MP-MRI tumor segmentation gives the best performance in terms of mean Dice-scores for the pathologic tissue classes on both datasets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5079350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50793502016-11-03 Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI Sauwen, N. Acou, M. Van Cauter, S. Sima, D.M. Veraart, J. Maes, F. Himmelreich, U. Achten, E. Van Huffel, S. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Tumor segmentation is a particularly challenging task in high-grade gliomas (HGGs), as they are among the most heterogeneous tumors in oncology. An accurate delineation of the lesion and its main subcomponents contributes to optimal treatment planning, prognosis and follow-up. Conventional MRI (cMRI) is the imaging modality of choice for manual segmentation, and is also considered in the vast majority of automated segmentation studies. Advanced MRI modalities such as perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) have already shown their added value in tumor tissue characterization, hence there have been recent suggestions of combining different MRI modalities into a multi-parametric MRI (MP-MRI) approach for brain tumor segmentation. In this paper, we compare the performance of several unsupervised classification methods for HGG segmentation based on MP-MRI data including cMRI, DWI, MRSI and PWI. Two independent MP-MRI datasets with a different acquisition protocol were available from different hospitals. We demonstrate that a hierarchical non-negative matrix factorization variant which was previously introduced for MP-MRI tumor segmentation gives the best performance in terms of mean Dice-scores for the pathologic tissue classes on both datasets. Elsevier 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5079350/ /pubmed/27812502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.09.021 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Sauwen, N. Acou, M. Van Cauter, S. Sima, D.M. Veraart, J. Maes, F. Himmelreich, U. Achten, E. Van Huffel, S. Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI |
title | Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI |
title_full | Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI |
title_fullStr | Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI |
title_short | Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI |
title_sort | comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric mri |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.09.021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sauwenn comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri AT acoum comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri AT vancauters comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri AT simadm comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri AT veraartj comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri AT maesf comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri AT himmelreichu comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri AT achtene comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri AT vanhuffels comparisonofunsupervisedclassificationmethodsforbraintumorsegmentationusingmultiparametricmri |