Cargando…

Comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer

[Purpose] To compare measurements of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength performed using a hand-held dynamometer and an isokinetic dynamometer in apparently healthy subjects. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty adult volunteers underwent knee muscle strength evaluation using an isokinetic or a hand-h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muff, Guillaume, Dufour, Stéphane, Meyer, Alain, Severac, François, Favret, Fabrice, Geny, Bernard, Lecocq, Jehan, Isner-Horobeti, Marie-Eve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.2445
_version_ 1782462658714271744
author Muff, Guillaume
Dufour, Stéphane
Meyer, Alain
Severac, François
Favret, Fabrice
Geny, Bernard
Lecocq, Jehan
Isner-Horobeti, Marie-Eve
author_facet Muff, Guillaume
Dufour, Stéphane
Meyer, Alain
Severac, François
Favret, Fabrice
Geny, Bernard
Lecocq, Jehan
Isner-Horobeti, Marie-Eve
author_sort Muff, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] To compare measurements of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength performed using a hand-held dynamometer and an isokinetic dynamometer in apparently healthy subjects. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty adult volunteers underwent knee muscle strength evaluation using an isokinetic or a hand-held dynamometer. [Results] Strong positive correlations were found between the 2 methods, with correlation coefficients r ranging from 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48−0.86) to 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75−0.94), depending on the muscle group and the isokinetic evaluation mode. The reproducibility of the hand-held dynamometer findings was good, judged by a coefficient of variation of 3.2–4.2%. However, the correlation between the 2 methods for the assessment of flexor/extensor ratios ranged from −0.04 to 0.46. [Conclusion] Knee extensor and flexor muscle strength recorded with a hand-held dynamometer is reproducible and significantly correlated with the isokinetic values, indicating that this method may in some cases be a useful replacement for isokinetic strength measurement. However, for strength ratio assessment, and when judged against the isokinetic standard, a hand-held dynamometer is not a valid option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5080149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50801492016-10-31 Comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer Muff, Guillaume Dufour, Stéphane Meyer, Alain Severac, François Favret, Fabrice Geny, Bernard Lecocq, Jehan Isner-Horobeti, Marie-Eve J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] To compare measurements of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength performed using a hand-held dynamometer and an isokinetic dynamometer in apparently healthy subjects. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty adult volunteers underwent knee muscle strength evaluation using an isokinetic or a hand-held dynamometer. [Results] Strong positive correlations were found between the 2 methods, with correlation coefficients r ranging from 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48−0.86) to 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75−0.94), depending on the muscle group and the isokinetic evaluation mode. The reproducibility of the hand-held dynamometer findings was good, judged by a coefficient of variation of 3.2–4.2%. However, the correlation between the 2 methods for the assessment of flexor/extensor ratios ranged from −0.04 to 0.46. [Conclusion] Knee extensor and flexor muscle strength recorded with a hand-held dynamometer is reproducible and significantly correlated with the isokinetic values, indicating that this method may in some cases be a useful replacement for isokinetic strength measurement. However, for strength ratio assessment, and when judged against the isokinetic standard, a hand-held dynamometer is not a valid option. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016-09-29 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5080149/ /pubmed/27799667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.2445 Text en 2016©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Muff, Guillaume
Dufour, Stéphane
Meyer, Alain
Severac, François
Favret, Fabrice
Geny, Bernard
Lecocq, Jehan
Isner-Horobeti, Marie-Eve
Comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer
title Comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer
title_full Comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer
title_short Comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer
title_sort comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.2445
work_keys_str_mv AT muffguillaume comparativeassessmentofkneeextensorandflexormusclestrengthmeasuredusingahandheldvsisokineticdynamometer
AT dufourstephane comparativeassessmentofkneeextensorandflexormusclestrengthmeasuredusingahandheldvsisokineticdynamometer
AT meyeralain comparativeassessmentofkneeextensorandflexormusclestrengthmeasuredusingahandheldvsisokineticdynamometer
AT severacfrancois comparativeassessmentofkneeextensorandflexormusclestrengthmeasuredusingahandheldvsisokineticdynamometer
AT favretfabrice comparativeassessmentofkneeextensorandflexormusclestrengthmeasuredusingahandheldvsisokineticdynamometer
AT genybernard comparativeassessmentofkneeextensorandflexormusclestrengthmeasuredusingahandheldvsisokineticdynamometer
AT lecocqjehan comparativeassessmentofkneeextensorandflexormusclestrengthmeasuredusingahandheldvsisokineticdynamometer
AT isnerhorobetimarieeve comparativeassessmentofkneeextensorandflexormusclestrengthmeasuredusingahandheldvsisokineticdynamometer