Cargando…

Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system

This paper examines the collaboration structures and dynamics of the co-authorship network of all Slovenian researchers. Its goal is to identify the key factors driving collaboration and the main differences in collaboration behavior across scientific fields and disciplines. Two approaches to modell...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferligoj, Anuška, Kronegger, Luka, Mali, Franc, Snijders, Tom A. B., Doreian, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1585-7
_version_ 1782462688719273984
author Ferligoj, Anuška
Kronegger, Luka
Mali, Franc
Snijders, Tom A. B.
Doreian, Patrick
author_facet Ferligoj, Anuška
Kronegger, Luka
Mali, Franc
Snijders, Tom A. B.
Doreian, Patrick
author_sort Ferligoj, Anuška
collection PubMed
description This paper examines the collaboration structures and dynamics of the co-authorship network of all Slovenian researchers. Its goal is to identify the key factors driving collaboration and the main differences in collaboration behavior across scientific fields and disciplines. Two approaches to modelling network dynamics are combined in this paper: the small-world model and the mechanism of preferential attachment, also known as the process of cumulative advantage. Stochastic-actor-based modelling of co-authorship network dynamics uses data for the complete longitudinal co-authorship networks for the entire Slovenian scientific community from 1996 to 2010. We confirmed the presence of clustering in all fields and disciplines. Preferential attachment is far more complex than a single global mechanism. There were two clear distinctions regarding collaboration within scientific fields and disciplines. One was that some fields had an internal national saturation inhibiting further collaboration. The second concerned the differential impact of collaboration with scientists from abroad on domestic collaboration. In the natural, technical, medical, and biotechnical sciences, this promotes collaboration within the Slovenian scientific community while in the social sciences and humanities this inhibits internal collaboration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5080332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50803322016-11-07 Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system Ferligoj, Anuška Kronegger, Luka Mali, Franc Snijders, Tom A. B. Doreian, Patrick Scientometrics Article This paper examines the collaboration structures and dynamics of the co-authorship network of all Slovenian researchers. Its goal is to identify the key factors driving collaboration and the main differences in collaboration behavior across scientific fields and disciplines. Two approaches to modelling network dynamics are combined in this paper: the small-world model and the mechanism of preferential attachment, also known as the process of cumulative advantage. Stochastic-actor-based modelling of co-authorship network dynamics uses data for the complete longitudinal co-authorship networks for the entire Slovenian scientific community from 1996 to 2010. We confirmed the presence of clustering in all fields and disciplines. Preferential attachment is far more complex than a single global mechanism. There were two clear distinctions regarding collaboration within scientific fields and disciplines. One was that some fields had an internal national saturation inhibiting further collaboration. The second concerned the differential impact of collaboration with scientists from abroad on domestic collaboration. In the natural, technical, medical, and biotechnical sciences, this promotes collaboration within the Slovenian scientific community while in the social sciences and humanities this inhibits internal collaboration. Springer Netherlands 2015-04-07 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC5080332/ /pubmed/27829692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1585-7 Text en © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015
spellingShingle Article
Ferligoj, Anuška
Kronegger, Luka
Mali, Franc
Snijders, Tom A. B.
Doreian, Patrick
Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system
title Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system
title_full Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system
title_fullStr Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system
title_full_unstemmed Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system
title_short Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system
title_sort scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1585-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ferligojanuska scientificcollaborationdynamicsinanationalscientificsystem
AT kroneggerluka scientificcollaborationdynamicsinanationalscientificsystem
AT malifranc scientificcollaborationdynamicsinanationalscientificsystem
AT snijderstomab scientificcollaborationdynamicsinanationalscientificsystem
AT doreianpatrick scientificcollaborationdynamicsinanationalscientificsystem