Cargando…
Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold
Critical flicker fusion thresholds (CFFTs) describe when quick amplitude modulations of a light source become undetectable as the frequency of the modulation increases and are thought to underlie a number of visual processing skills, including reading. Here, we compare the impact of two vision-train...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01597 |
_version_ | 1782462690173648896 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Tianyou Náñez, Jose E. Zimmerman, Daniel Holloway, Steven R. Seitz, Aaron |
author_facet | Zhou, Tianyou Náñez, Jose E. Zimmerman, Daniel Holloway, Steven R. Seitz, Aaron |
author_sort | Zhou, Tianyou |
collection | PubMed |
description | Critical flicker fusion thresholds (CFFTs) describe when quick amplitude modulations of a light source become undetectable as the frequency of the modulation increases and are thought to underlie a number of visual processing skills, including reading. Here, we compare the impact of two vision-training approaches, one involving contrast sensitivity training and the other directional dot-motion training, compared to an active control group trained on Sudoku. The three training paradigms were compared on their effectiveness for altering CFFT. Directional dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training resulted in significant improvement in CFFT, while the Sudoku group did not yield significant improvement. This finding indicates that dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training similarly transfer to effect changes in CFFT. The results, combined with prior research linking CFFT to high-order cognitive processes such as reading ability, and studies showing positive impact of both dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training in reading, provide a possible mechanistic link of how these different training approaches impact reading abilities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5080338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50803382016-11-10 Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold Zhou, Tianyou Náñez, Jose E. Zimmerman, Daniel Holloway, Steven R. Seitz, Aaron Front Psychol Psychology Critical flicker fusion thresholds (CFFTs) describe when quick amplitude modulations of a light source become undetectable as the frequency of the modulation increases and are thought to underlie a number of visual processing skills, including reading. Here, we compare the impact of two vision-training approaches, one involving contrast sensitivity training and the other directional dot-motion training, compared to an active control group trained on Sudoku. The three training paradigms were compared on their effectiveness for altering CFFT. Directional dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training resulted in significant improvement in CFFT, while the Sudoku group did not yield significant improvement. This finding indicates that dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training similarly transfer to effect changes in CFFT. The results, combined with prior research linking CFFT to high-order cognitive processes such as reading ability, and studies showing positive impact of both dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training in reading, provide a possible mechanistic link of how these different training approaches impact reading abilities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5080338/ /pubmed/27833569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01597 Text en Copyright © 2016 Zhou, Náñez, Zimmerman, Holloway and Seitz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Zhou, Tianyou Náñez, Jose E. Zimmerman, Daniel Holloway, Steven R. Seitz, Aaron Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold |
title | Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold |
title_full | Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold |
title_fullStr | Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold |
title_full_unstemmed | Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold |
title_short | Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold |
title_sort | two visual training paradigms associated with enhanced critical flicker fusion threshold |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoutianyou twovisualtrainingparadigmsassociatedwithenhancedcriticalflickerfusionthreshold AT nanezjosee twovisualtrainingparadigmsassociatedwithenhancedcriticalflickerfusionthreshold AT zimmermandaniel twovisualtrainingparadigmsassociatedwithenhancedcriticalflickerfusionthreshold AT hollowaystevenr twovisualtrainingparadigmsassociatedwithenhancedcriticalflickerfusionthreshold AT seitzaaron twovisualtrainingparadigmsassociatedwithenhancedcriticalflickerfusionthreshold |