Cargando…

Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold

Critical flicker fusion thresholds (CFFTs) describe when quick amplitude modulations of a light source become undetectable as the frequency of the modulation increases and are thought to underlie a number of visual processing skills, including reading. Here, we compare the impact of two vision-train...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Tianyou, Náñez, Jose E., Zimmerman, Daniel, Holloway, Steven R., Seitz, Aaron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833569
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01597
_version_ 1782462690173648896
author Zhou, Tianyou
Náñez, Jose E.
Zimmerman, Daniel
Holloway, Steven R.
Seitz, Aaron
author_facet Zhou, Tianyou
Náñez, Jose E.
Zimmerman, Daniel
Holloway, Steven R.
Seitz, Aaron
author_sort Zhou, Tianyou
collection PubMed
description Critical flicker fusion thresholds (CFFTs) describe when quick amplitude modulations of a light source become undetectable as the frequency of the modulation increases and are thought to underlie a number of visual processing skills, including reading. Here, we compare the impact of two vision-training approaches, one involving contrast sensitivity training and the other directional dot-motion training, compared to an active control group trained on Sudoku. The three training paradigms were compared on their effectiveness for altering CFFT. Directional dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training resulted in significant improvement in CFFT, while the Sudoku group did not yield significant improvement. This finding indicates that dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training similarly transfer to effect changes in CFFT. The results, combined with prior research linking CFFT to high-order cognitive processes such as reading ability, and studies showing positive impact of both dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training in reading, provide a possible mechanistic link of how these different training approaches impact reading abilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5080338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50803382016-11-10 Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold Zhou, Tianyou Náñez, Jose E. Zimmerman, Daniel Holloway, Steven R. Seitz, Aaron Front Psychol Psychology Critical flicker fusion thresholds (CFFTs) describe when quick amplitude modulations of a light source become undetectable as the frequency of the modulation increases and are thought to underlie a number of visual processing skills, including reading. Here, we compare the impact of two vision-training approaches, one involving contrast sensitivity training and the other directional dot-motion training, compared to an active control group trained on Sudoku. The three training paradigms were compared on their effectiveness for altering CFFT. Directional dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training resulted in significant improvement in CFFT, while the Sudoku group did not yield significant improvement. This finding indicates that dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training similarly transfer to effect changes in CFFT. The results, combined with prior research linking CFFT to high-order cognitive processes such as reading ability, and studies showing positive impact of both dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training in reading, provide a possible mechanistic link of how these different training approaches impact reading abilities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5080338/ /pubmed/27833569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01597 Text en Copyright © 2016 Zhou, Náñez, Zimmerman, Holloway and Seitz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Zhou, Tianyou
Náñez, Jose E.
Zimmerman, Daniel
Holloway, Steven R.
Seitz, Aaron
Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold
title Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold
title_full Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold
title_fullStr Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold
title_full_unstemmed Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold
title_short Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold
title_sort two visual training paradigms associated with enhanced critical flicker fusion threshold
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833569
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01597
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoutianyou twovisualtrainingparadigmsassociatedwithenhancedcriticalflickerfusionthreshold
AT nanezjosee twovisualtrainingparadigmsassociatedwithenhancedcriticalflickerfusionthreshold
AT zimmermandaniel twovisualtrainingparadigmsassociatedwithenhancedcriticalflickerfusionthreshold
AT hollowaystevenr twovisualtrainingparadigmsassociatedwithenhancedcriticalflickerfusionthreshold
AT seitzaaron twovisualtrainingparadigmsassociatedwithenhancedcriticalflickerfusionthreshold