Cargando…

Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial

Objective To determine whether low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), compared with sham treatment, accelerates functional recovery and radiographic healing in patients with operatively managed tibial fractures. Design A concealed, randomized, blinded, sham controlled clinical trial with a paralle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Busse, Jason W, Bhandari, Mohit, Einhorn, Thomas A, Schemitsch, Emil, Heckman, James D, Tornetta, Paul, Leung, Kwok-Sui, Heels-Ansdell, Diane, Makosso-Kallyth, Sun, Della Rocca, Gregory J, Jones, Clifford B, Guyatt, Gordon H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27797787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5351
_version_ 1782462716833693696
author Busse, Jason W
Bhandari, Mohit
Einhorn, Thomas A
Schemitsch, Emil
Heckman, James D
Tornetta, Paul
Leung, Kwok-Sui
Heels-Ansdell, Diane
Makosso-Kallyth, Sun
Della Rocca, Gregory J
Jones, Clifford B
Guyatt, Gordon H
author_facet Busse, Jason W
Bhandari, Mohit
Einhorn, Thomas A
Schemitsch, Emil
Heckman, James D
Tornetta, Paul
Leung, Kwok-Sui
Heels-Ansdell, Diane
Makosso-Kallyth, Sun
Della Rocca, Gregory J
Jones, Clifford B
Guyatt, Gordon H
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine whether low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), compared with sham treatment, accelerates functional recovery and radiographic healing in patients with operatively managed tibial fractures. Design A concealed, randomized, blinded, sham controlled clinical trial with a parallel group design of 501 patients, enrolled between October 2008 and September 2012, and followed for one year. Setting 43 North American academic trauma centers. Participants Skeletally mature men or women with an open or closed tibial fracture amenable to intramedullary nail fixation. Exclusions comprised pilon fractures, tibial shaft fractures that extended into the joint and required reduction, pathological fractures, bilateral tibial fractures, segmental fractures, spiral fractures >7.5 cm in length, concomitant injuries that were likely to impair function for at least as long as the patient’s tibial fracture, and tibial fractures that showed <25% cortical contact and >1 cm gap after surgical fixation. 3105 consecutive patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for tibial fracture were assessed, 599 were eligible and 501 provided informed consent and were enrolled. Interventions Patients were allocated centrally to self administer daily LIPUS (n=250) or use a sham device (n=251) until their tibial fracture showed radiographic healing or until one year after intramedullary fixation. Main outcome measures Primary registry specified outcome was time to radiographic healing within one year of fixation; secondary outcome was rate of non-union. Additional protocol specified outcomes included short form-36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) scores, return to work, return to household activities, return to ≥80% of function before injury, return to leisure activities, time to full weight bearing, scores on the health utilities index (mark 3), and adverse events related to the device. Results SF-36 PCS data were acquired from 481/501 (96%) patients, for whom we had 2303/2886 (80%) observations, and radiographic healing data were acquired from 482/501 (96%) patients, of whom 82 were censored. Results showed no impact on SF-36 PCS scores between LIPUS and control groups (mean difference 0.55, 95% confidence interval −0.75 to 1.84; P=0.41) or for the interaction between time and treatment (P=0.30); minimal important difference is 3-5 points) or in other functional measures. There was also no difference in time to radiographic healing (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.34; P=0.55). There were no differences in safety outcomes between treatment groups. Patient compliance was moderate; 73% of patients administered ≥50% of all recommended treatments. Conclusions Postoperative use of LIPUS after tibial fracture fixation does not accelerate radiographic healing and fails to improve functional recovery. Study registration ClinicalTrialGov Identifier: NCT00667849
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5080447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50804472016-10-27 Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial Busse, Jason W Bhandari, Mohit Einhorn, Thomas A Schemitsch, Emil Heckman, James D Tornetta, Paul Leung, Kwok-Sui Heels-Ansdell, Diane Makosso-Kallyth, Sun Della Rocca, Gregory J Jones, Clifford B Guyatt, Gordon H BMJ Research Objective To determine whether low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), compared with sham treatment, accelerates functional recovery and radiographic healing in patients with operatively managed tibial fractures. Design A concealed, randomized, blinded, sham controlled clinical trial with a parallel group design of 501 patients, enrolled between October 2008 and September 2012, and followed for one year. Setting 43 North American academic trauma centers. Participants Skeletally mature men or women with an open or closed tibial fracture amenable to intramedullary nail fixation. Exclusions comprised pilon fractures, tibial shaft fractures that extended into the joint and required reduction, pathological fractures, bilateral tibial fractures, segmental fractures, spiral fractures >7.5 cm in length, concomitant injuries that were likely to impair function for at least as long as the patient’s tibial fracture, and tibial fractures that showed <25% cortical contact and >1 cm gap after surgical fixation. 3105 consecutive patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for tibial fracture were assessed, 599 were eligible and 501 provided informed consent and were enrolled. Interventions Patients were allocated centrally to self administer daily LIPUS (n=250) or use a sham device (n=251) until their tibial fracture showed radiographic healing or until one year after intramedullary fixation. Main outcome measures Primary registry specified outcome was time to radiographic healing within one year of fixation; secondary outcome was rate of non-union. Additional protocol specified outcomes included short form-36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) scores, return to work, return to household activities, return to ≥80% of function before injury, return to leisure activities, time to full weight bearing, scores on the health utilities index (mark 3), and adverse events related to the device. Results SF-36 PCS data were acquired from 481/501 (96%) patients, for whom we had 2303/2886 (80%) observations, and radiographic healing data were acquired from 482/501 (96%) patients, of whom 82 were censored. Results showed no impact on SF-36 PCS scores between LIPUS and control groups (mean difference 0.55, 95% confidence interval −0.75 to 1.84; P=0.41) or for the interaction between time and treatment (P=0.30); minimal important difference is 3-5 points) or in other functional measures. There was also no difference in time to radiographic healing (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.34; P=0.55). There were no differences in safety outcomes between treatment groups. Patient compliance was moderate; 73% of patients administered ≥50% of all recommended treatments. Conclusions Postoperative use of LIPUS after tibial fracture fixation does not accelerate radiographic healing and fails to improve functional recovery. Study registration ClinicalTrialGov Identifier: NCT00667849 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5080447/ /pubmed/27797787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5351 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Busse, Jason W
Bhandari, Mohit
Einhorn, Thomas A
Schemitsch, Emil
Heckman, James D
Tornetta, Paul
Leung, Kwok-Sui
Heels-Ansdell, Diane
Makosso-Kallyth, Sun
Della Rocca, Gregory J
Jones, Clifford B
Guyatt, Gordon H
Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial
title Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial
title_full Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial
title_short Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial
title_sort re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (trust): randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27797787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5351
work_keys_str_mv AT reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bussejasonw reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bhandarimohit reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT einhornthomasa reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT schemitschemil reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT heckmanjamesd reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tornettapaul reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT leungkwoksui reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT heelsansdelldiane reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT makossokallythsun reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dellaroccagregoryj reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jonescliffordb reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT guyattgordonh reevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundintreatmentoftibialfracturestrustrandomizedclinicaltrial