Cargando…
Integrated presentation of ecological risk from multiple stressors
Current environmental risk assessments (ERA) do not account explicitly for ecological factors (e.g. species composition, temperature or food availability) and multiple stressors. Assessing mixtures of chemical and ecological stressors is needed as well as accounting for variability in environmental...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27782171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36004 |
_version_ | 1782462743696113664 |
---|---|
author | Goussen, Benoit Price, Oliver R. Rendal, Cecilie Ashauer, Roman |
author_facet | Goussen, Benoit Price, Oliver R. Rendal, Cecilie Ashauer, Roman |
author_sort | Goussen, Benoit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current environmental risk assessments (ERA) do not account explicitly for ecological factors (e.g. species composition, temperature or food availability) and multiple stressors. Assessing mixtures of chemical and ecological stressors is needed as well as accounting for variability in environmental conditions and uncertainty of data and models. Here we propose a novel probabilistic ERA framework to overcome these limitations, which focusses on visualising assessment outcomes by construct-ing and interpreting prevalence plots as a quantitative prediction of risk. Key components include environmental scenarios that integrate exposure and ecology, and ecological modelling of relevant endpoints to assess the effect of a combination of stressors. Our illustrative results demonstrate the importance of regional differences in environmental conditions and the confounding interactions of stressors. Using this framework and prevalence plots provides a risk-based approach that combines risk assessment and risk management in a meaningful way and presents a truly mechanistic alternative to the threshold approach. Even whilst research continues to improve the underlying models and data, regulators and decision makers can already use the framework and prevalence plots. The integration of multiple stressors, environmental conditions and variability makes ERA more relevant and realistic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5080554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50805542016-10-31 Integrated presentation of ecological risk from multiple stressors Goussen, Benoit Price, Oliver R. Rendal, Cecilie Ashauer, Roman Sci Rep Article Current environmental risk assessments (ERA) do not account explicitly for ecological factors (e.g. species composition, temperature or food availability) and multiple stressors. Assessing mixtures of chemical and ecological stressors is needed as well as accounting for variability in environmental conditions and uncertainty of data and models. Here we propose a novel probabilistic ERA framework to overcome these limitations, which focusses on visualising assessment outcomes by construct-ing and interpreting prevalence plots as a quantitative prediction of risk. Key components include environmental scenarios that integrate exposure and ecology, and ecological modelling of relevant endpoints to assess the effect of a combination of stressors. Our illustrative results demonstrate the importance of regional differences in environmental conditions and the confounding interactions of stressors. Using this framework and prevalence plots provides a risk-based approach that combines risk assessment and risk management in a meaningful way and presents a truly mechanistic alternative to the threshold approach. Even whilst research continues to improve the underlying models and data, regulators and decision makers can already use the framework and prevalence plots. The integration of multiple stressors, environmental conditions and variability makes ERA more relevant and realistic. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5080554/ /pubmed/27782171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36004 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Goussen, Benoit Price, Oliver R. Rendal, Cecilie Ashauer, Roman Integrated presentation of ecological risk from multiple stressors |
title | Integrated presentation of ecological risk from multiple stressors |
title_full | Integrated presentation of ecological risk from multiple stressors |
title_fullStr | Integrated presentation of ecological risk from multiple stressors |
title_full_unstemmed | Integrated presentation of ecological risk from multiple stressors |
title_short | Integrated presentation of ecological risk from multiple stressors |
title_sort | integrated presentation of ecological risk from multiple stressors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27782171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goussenbenoit integratedpresentationofecologicalriskfrommultiplestressors AT priceoliverr integratedpresentationofecologicalriskfrommultiplestressors AT rendalcecilie integratedpresentationofecologicalriskfrommultiplestressors AT ashauerroman integratedpresentationofecologicalriskfrommultiplestressors |