Cargando…

RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include anti-epithelial growth factor therapies, which, in Europe, are indicated in patients with RAS wild-type tumours only and require prior mutation testing of “hot-spot” codons in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boleij, Annemarie, Tack, Véronique, Taylor, Aliki, Kafatos, George, Jenkins-Anderson, Sophie, Tembuyser, Lien, Dequeker, Els, van Krieken, J. Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27784278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2810-3
_version_ 1782462787160637440
author Boleij, Annemarie
Tack, Véronique
Taylor, Aliki
Kafatos, George
Jenkins-Anderson, Sophie
Tembuyser, Lien
Dequeker, Els
van Krieken, J. Han
author_facet Boleij, Annemarie
Tack, Véronique
Taylor, Aliki
Kafatos, George
Jenkins-Anderson, Sophie
Tembuyser, Lien
Dequeker, Els
van Krieken, J. Han
author_sort Boleij, Annemarie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include anti-epithelial growth factor therapies, which, in Europe, are indicated in patients with RAS wild-type tumours only and require prior mutation testing of “hot-spot” codons in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of RAS testing methods and estimate the RAS mutation prevalence in mCRC patients. METHODS: Overall, 194 pathology laboratories were invited to complete an online survey. Participating laboratories were asked to provide information on their testing practices and aggregated RAS mutation data from 20 to 30 recently tested patients with mCRC. RESULTS: A total of 96 (49.5 %) laboratories across 24 European countries completed the survey. All participants tested KRAS exon 2, codons 12 and 13. Seventy (72.9 %) laboratories reported complete testing of all RAS hot-spot codons, and three (3.1 %) reported only testing KRAS exon 2. Sixty-nine (71.9 %) laboratories reported testing >80 patients yearly for RAS mutation status. Testing was typically performed within the reporting institution (93.8 %, n = 90), at the request of a treating oncologist (89.5 %, n = 85); testing methodology varied by laboratory and by individual codon tested. For laboratory RAS testing, turnaround times were ≤10 working days for the majority of institutions (90.6 %, n = 87). The overall crude RAS mutation prevalence was 48.5 % (95 % confidence interval: 46.4–50.6) for laboratories testing all RAS hot-spot codons. Prevalence estimates varied significantly by primary tumour location, approximate number of patients tested yearly and indication given for RAS testing. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a rapid uptake of RAS testing in the majority of European pathology laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5080758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50807582016-10-31 RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres Boleij, Annemarie Tack, Véronique Taylor, Aliki Kafatos, George Jenkins-Anderson, Sophie Tembuyser, Lien Dequeker, Els van Krieken, J. Han BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include anti-epithelial growth factor therapies, which, in Europe, are indicated in patients with RAS wild-type tumours only and require prior mutation testing of “hot-spot” codons in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of RAS testing methods and estimate the RAS mutation prevalence in mCRC patients. METHODS: Overall, 194 pathology laboratories were invited to complete an online survey. Participating laboratories were asked to provide information on their testing practices and aggregated RAS mutation data from 20 to 30 recently tested patients with mCRC. RESULTS: A total of 96 (49.5 %) laboratories across 24 European countries completed the survey. All participants tested KRAS exon 2, codons 12 and 13. Seventy (72.9 %) laboratories reported complete testing of all RAS hot-spot codons, and three (3.1 %) reported only testing KRAS exon 2. Sixty-nine (71.9 %) laboratories reported testing >80 patients yearly for RAS mutation status. Testing was typically performed within the reporting institution (93.8 %, n = 90), at the request of a treating oncologist (89.5 %, n = 85); testing methodology varied by laboratory and by individual codon tested. For laboratory RAS testing, turnaround times were ≤10 working days for the majority of institutions (90.6 %, n = 87). The overall crude RAS mutation prevalence was 48.5 % (95 % confidence interval: 46.4–50.6) for laboratories testing all RAS hot-spot codons. Prevalence estimates varied significantly by primary tumour location, approximate number of patients tested yearly and indication given for RAS testing. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a rapid uptake of RAS testing in the majority of European pathology laboratories. BioMed Central 2016-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5080758/ /pubmed/27784278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2810-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boleij, Annemarie
Tack, Véronique
Taylor, Aliki
Kafatos, George
Jenkins-Anderson, Sophie
Tembuyser, Lien
Dequeker, Els
van Krieken, J. Han
RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres
title RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres
title_full RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres
title_fullStr RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres
title_full_unstemmed RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres
title_short RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres
title_sort ras testing practices and ras mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a europe-wide survey of pathology centres
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27784278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2810-3
work_keys_str_mv AT boleijannemarie rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres
AT tackveronique rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres
AT tayloraliki rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres
AT kafatosgeorge rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres
AT jenkinsandersonsophie rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres
AT tembuyserlien rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres
AT dequekerels rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres
AT vankriekenjhan rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres