Cargando…
RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres
BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include anti-epithelial growth factor therapies, which, in Europe, are indicated in patients with RAS wild-type tumours only and require prior mutation testing of “hot-spot” codons in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27784278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2810-3 |
_version_ | 1782462787160637440 |
---|---|
author | Boleij, Annemarie Tack, Véronique Taylor, Aliki Kafatos, George Jenkins-Anderson, Sophie Tembuyser, Lien Dequeker, Els van Krieken, J. Han |
author_facet | Boleij, Annemarie Tack, Véronique Taylor, Aliki Kafatos, George Jenkins-Anderson, Sophie Tembuyser, Lien Dequeker, Els van Krieken, J. Han |
author_sort | Boleij, Annemarie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include anti-epithelial growth factor therapies, which, in Europe, are indicated in patients with RAS wild-type tumours only and require prior mutation testing of “hot-spot” codons in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of RAS testing methods and estimate the RAS mutation prevalence in mCRC patients. METHODS: Overall, 194 pathology laboratories were invited to complete an online survey. Participating laboratories were asked to provide information on their testing practices and aggregated RAS mutation data from 20 to 30 recently tested patients with mCRC. RESULTS: A total of 96 (49.5 %) laboratories across 24 European countries completed the survey. All participants tested KRAS exon 2, codons 12 and 13. Seventy (72.9 %) laboratories reported complete testing of all RAS hot-spot codons, and three (3.1 %) reported only testing KRAS exon 2. Sixty-nine (71.9 %) laboratories reported testing >80 patients yearly for RAS mutation status. Testing was typically performed within the reporting institution (93.8 %, n = 90), at the request of a treating oncologist (89.5 %, n = 85); testing methodology varied by laboratory and by individual codon tested. For laboratory RAS testing, turnaround times were ≤10 working days for the majority of institutions (90.6 %, n = 87). The overall crude RAS mutation prevalence was 48.5 % (95 % confidence interval: 46.4–50.6) for laboratories testing all RAS hot-spot codons. Prevalence estimates varied significantly by primary tumour location, approximate number of patients tested yearly and indication given for RAS testing. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a rapid uptake of RAS testing in the majority of European pathology laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5080758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50807582016-10-31 RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres Boleij, Annemarie Tack, Véronique Taylor, Aliki Kafatos, George Jenkins-Anderson, Sophie Tembuyser, Lien Dequeker, Els van Krieken, J. Han BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include anti-epithelial growth factor therapies, which, in Europe, are indicated in patients with RAS wild-type tumours only and require prior mutation testing of “hot-spot” codons in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of RAS testing methods and estimate the RAS mutation prevalence in mCRC patients. METHODS: Overall, 194 pathology laboratories were invited to complete an online survey. Participating laboratories were asked to provide information on their testing practices and aggregated RAS mutation data from 20 to 30 recently tested patients with mCRC. RESULTS: A total of 96 (49.5 %) laboratories across 24 European countries completed the survey. All participants tested KRAS exon 2, codons 12 and 13. Seventy (72.9 %) laboratories reported complete testing of all RAS hot-spot codons, and three (3.1 %) reported only testing KRAS exon 2. Sixty-nine (71.9 %) laboratories reported testing >80 patients yearly for RAS mutation status. Testing was typically performed within the reporting institution (93.8 %, n = 90), at the request of a treating oncologist (89.5 %, n = 85); testing methodology varied by laboratory and by individual codon tested. For laboratory RAS testing, turnaround times were ≤10 working days for the majority of institutions (90.6 %, n = 87). The overall crude RAS mutation prevalence was 48.5 % (95 % confidence interval: 46.4–50.6) for laboratories testing all RAS hot-spot codons. Prevalence estimates varied significantly by primary tumour location, approximate number of patients tested yearly and indication given for RAS testing. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a rapid uptake of RAS testing in the majority of European pathology laboratories. BioMed Central 2016-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5080758/ /pubmed/27784278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2810-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Boleij, Annemarie Tack, Véronique Taylor, Aliki Kafatos, George Jenkins-Anderson, Sophie Tembuyser, Lien Dequeker, Els van Krieken, J. Han RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres |
title | RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres |
title_full | RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres |
title_fullStr | RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres |
title_full_unstemmed | RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres |
title_short | RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres |
title_sort | ras testing practices and ras mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a europe-wide survey of pathology centres |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27784278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2810-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boleijannemarie rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres AT tackveronique rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres AT tayloraliki rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres AT kafatosgeorge rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres AT jenkinsandersonsophie rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres AT tembuyserlien rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres AT dequekerels rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres AT vankriekenjhan rastestingpracticesandrasmutationprevalenceamongpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancerresultsfromaeuropewidesurveyofpathologycentres |