Cargando…

Radiation Therapy Alone in cT1-3N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Are Unfit for Surgical Resection or Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Risk-Adaptive Dose Schedules

PURPOSE: High dose definitive radiation therapy (RT) alone is recommended to patients with cT1-3N0 non-small cell lung cancer, who are unfit for surgery or stereotactic RT. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness following RT alone using two different modest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Won Kyung, Noh, Jae Myoung, Ahn, Yong Chan, Oh, Dongryul, Pyo, Hongryull
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26987393
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.391
_version_ 1782462806580264960
author Cho, Won Kyung
Noh, Jae Myoung
Ahn, Yong Chan
Oh, Dongryul
Pyo, Hongryull
author_facet Cho, Won Kyung
Noh, Jae Myoung
Ahn, Yong Chan
Oh, Dongryul
Pyo, Hongryull
author_sort Cho, Won Kyung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: High dose definitive radiation therapy (RT) alone is recommended to patients with cT1-3N0 non-small cell lung cancer, who are unfit for surgery or stereotactic RT. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness following RT alone using two different modest hypofractionation dose schemes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2014, 124 patients underwent RT alone. From 2001 till 2010, 60 Gy in 20 fractions was delivered to 79 patients (group 1). Since 2011, 60 Gy in 20 fractions (group 2, 20 patients), and 60 Gy in 15 fractions (group 3, 25 patients) were selectively chosen depending on estimated risk of esophagitis. RESULTS: At follow-up of 16.7 months, 2-year rates of local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 62.6%, 39.1%, and 59.1%, respectively. Overall survival was significantly better in group 3 (p=0.002). In multivariate analyses, cT3 was the most powerful adverse factor affecting clinical outcomes. Incidence and severity of radiation pneumonitis were not different among groups, while no patients developed grade 2 esophagitis in group 3 (p=0.003). Under current Korean Health Insurance Policy, RT cost per person was 22.5% less in group 3 compared with others. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that 60 Gy in 15 fractions instead of 60 Gy in 20 fractions resulted in comparable clinical outcomes with excellent safety, direct cost saving, and improved convenience to the patients with tumors located at ≥ 1.5 cm from the esophagus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5080831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50808312016-11-03 Radiation Therapy Alone in cT1-3N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Are Unfit for Surgical Resection or Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Risk-Adaptive Dose Schedules Cho, Won Kyung Noh, Jae Myoung Ahn, Yong Chan Oh, Dongryul Pyo, Hongryull Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: High dose definitive radiation therapy (RT) alone is recommended to patients with cT1-3N0 non-small cell lung cancer, who are unfit for surgery or stereotactic RT. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness following RT alone using two different modest hypofractionation dose schemes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2014, 124 patients underwent RT alone. From 2001 till 2010, 60 Gy in 20 fractions was delivered to 79 patients (group 1). Since 2011, 60 Gy in 20 fractions (group 2, 20 patients), and 60 Gy in 15 fractions (group 3, 25 patients) were selectively chosen depending on estimated risk of esophagitis. RESULTS: At follow-up of 16.7 months, 2-year rates of local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 62.6%, 39.1%, and 59.1%, respectively. Overall survival was significantly better in group 3 (p=0.002). In multivariate analyses, cT3 was the most powerful adverse factor affecting clinical outcomes. Incidence and severity of radiation pneumonitis were not different among groups, while no patients developed grade 2 esophagitis in group 3 (p=0.003). Under current Korean Health Insurance Policy, RT cost per person was 22.5% less in group 3 compared with others. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that 60 Gy in 15 fractions instead of 60 Gy in 20 fractions resulted in comparable clinical outcomes with excellent safety, direct cost saving, and improved convenience to the patients with tumors located at ≥ 1.5 cm from the esophagus. Korean Cancer Association 2016-10 2016-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5080831/ /pubmed/26987393 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.391 Text en Copyright © 2016 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cho, Won Kyung
Noh, Jae Myoung
Ahn, Yong Chan
Oh, Dongryul
Pyo, Hongryull
Radiation Therapy Alone in cT1-3N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Are Unfit for Surgical Resection or Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Risk-Adaptive Dose Schedules
title Radiation Therapy Alone in cT1-3N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Are Unfit for Surgical Resection or Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Risk-Adaptive Dose Schedules
title_full Radiation Therapy Alone in cT1-3N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Are Unfit for Surgical Resection or Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Risk-Adaptive Dose Schedules
title_fullStr Radiation Therapy Alone in cT1-3N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Are Unfit for Surgical Resection or Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Risk-Adaptive Dose Schedules
title_full_unstemmed Radiation Therapy Alone in cT1-3N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Are Unfit for Surgical Resection or Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Risk-Adaptive Dose Schedules
title_short Radiation Therapy Alone in cT1-3N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Are Unfit for Surgical Resection or Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Risk-Adaptive Dose Schedules
title_sort radiation therapy alone in ct1-3n0 non-small cell lung cancer patients who are unfit for surgical resection or stereotactic radiation therapy: comparison of risk-adaptive dose schedules
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26987393
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.391
work_keys_str_mv AT chowonkyung radiationtherapyaloneinct13n0nonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswhoareunfitforsurgicalresectionorstereotacticradiationtherapycomparisonofriskadaptivedoseschedules
AT nohjaemyoung radiationtherapyaloneinct13n0nonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswhoareunfitforsurgicalresectionorstereotacticradiationtherapycomparisonofriskadaptivedoseschedules
AT ahnyongchan radiationtherapyaloneinct13n0nonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswhoareunfitforsurgicalresectionorstereotacticradiationtherapycomparisonofriskadaptivedoseschedules
AT ohdongryul radiationtherapyaloneinct13n0nonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswhoareunfitforsurgicalresectionorstereotacticradiationtherapycomparisonofriskadaptivedoseschedules
AT pyohongryull radiationtherapyaloneinct13n0nonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswhoareunfitforsurgicalresectionorstereotacticradiationtherapycomparisonofriskadaptivedoseschedules