Cargando…

Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Multiple Myeloma Using Administrative Claims Data

PURPOSE: The objective was to expand on prior work by developing and validating a new algorithm to identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients in administrative claims. METHODS: Two files were constructed to select MM cases from MarketScan Oncology Electronic Medical Records (EMR) and controls from the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Princic, Nicole, Gregory, Chris, Willson, Tina, Mahue, Maya, Felici, Diana, Werther, Winifred, Lenhart, Gregory, Foley, Kathleen A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5081355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00224
_version_ 1782462873400770560
author Princic, Nicole
Gregory, Chris
Willson, Tina
Mahue, Maya
Felici, Diana
Werther, Winifred
Lenhart, Gregory
Foley, Kathleen A.
author_facet Princic, Nicole
Gregory, Chris
Willson, Tina
Mahue, Maya
Felici, Diana
Werther, Winifred
Lenhart, Gregory
Foley, Kathleen A.
author_sort Princic, Nicole
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective was to expand on prior work by developing and validating a new algorithm to identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients in administrative claims. METHODS: Two files were constructed to select MM cases from MarketScan Oncology Electronic Medical Records (EMR) and controls from the MarketScan Primary Care EMR during January 1, 2000–March 31, 2014. Patients were linked to MarketScan claims databases, and files were merged. Eligible cases were age ≥18, had a diagnosis and visit for MM in the Oncology EMR, and were continuously enrolled in claims for ≥90 days preceding and ≥30 days after diagnosis. Controls were age ≥18, had ≥12 months of overlap in claims enrollment (observation period) in the Primary Care EMR and ≥1 claim with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code of MM (203.0×) during that time. Controls were excluded if they had chemotherapy; stem cell transplant; or text documentation of MM in the EMR during the observation period. A split sample was used to develop and validate algorithms. A maximum of 180 days prior to and following each MM diagnosis was used to identify events in the diagnostic process. Of 20 algorithms explored, the baseline algorithm of 2 MM diagnoses and the 3 best performing were validated. Values for sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. CONCLUSION: Three claims-based algorithms were validated with ~10% improvement in PPV (87–94%) over prior work (81%) and the baseline algorithm (76%) and can be considered for future research. Consistent with prior work, it was found that MM diagnoses before and after tests were needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5081355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50813552016-11-10 Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Multiple Myeloma Using Administrative Claims Data Princic, Nicole Gregory, Chris Willson, Tina Mahue, Maya Felici, Diana Werther, Winifred Lenhart, Gregory Foley, Kathleen A. Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: The objective was to expand on prior work by developing and validating a new algorithm to identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients in administrative claims. METHODS: Two files were constructed to select MM cases from MarketScan Oncology Electronic Medical Records (EMR) and controls from the MarketScan Primary Care EMR during January 1, 2000–March 31, 2014. Patients were linked to MarketScan claims databases, and files were merged. Eligible cases were age ≥18, had a diagnosis and visit for MM in the Oncology EMR, and were continuously enrolled in claims for ≥90 days preceding and ≥30 days after diagnosis. Controls were age ≥18, had ≥12 months of overlap in claims enrollment (observation period) in the Primary Care EMR and ≥1 claim with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code of MM (203.0×) during that time. Controls were excluded if they had chemotherapy; stem cell transplant; or text documentation of MM in the EMR during the observation period. A split sample was used to develop and validate algorithms. A maximum of 180 days prior to and following each MM diagnosis was used to identify events in the diagnostic process. Of 20 algorithms explored, the baseline algorithm of 2 MM diagnoses and the 3 best performing were validated. Values for sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. CONCLUSION: Three claims-based algorithms were validated with ~10% improvement in PPV (87–94%) over prior work (81%) and the baseline algorithm (76%) and can be considered for future research. Consistent with prior work, it was found that MM diagnoses before and after tests were needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5081355/ /pubmed/27833899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00224 Text en Copyright © 2016 Princic, Gregory, Willson, Mahue, Felici, Werther, Lenhart and Foley. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Princic, Nicole
Gregory, Chris
Willson, Tina
Mahue, Maya
Felici, Diana
Werther, Winifred
Lenhart, Gregory
Foley, Kathleen A.
Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Multiple Myeloma Using Administrative Claims Data
title Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Multiple Myeloma Using Administrative Claims Data
title_full Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Multiple Myeloma Using Administrative Claims Data
title_fullStr Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Multiple Myeloma Using Administrative Claims Data
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Multiple Myeloma Using Administrative Claims Data
title_short Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Multiple Myeloma Using Administrative Claims Data
title_sort development and validation of an algorithm to identify patients with multiple myeloma using administrative claims data
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5081355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00224
work_keys_str_mv AT princicnicole developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmtoidentifypatientswithmultiplemyelomausingadministrativeclaimsdata
AT gregorychris developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmtoidentifypatientswithmultiplemyelomausingadministrativeclaimsdata
AT willsontina developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmtoidentifypatientswithmultiplemyelomausingadministrativeclaimsdata
AT mahuemaya developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmtoidentifypatientswithmultiplemyelomausingadministrativeclaimsdata
AT felicidiana developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmtoidentifypatientswithmultiplemyelomausingadministrativeclaimsdata
AT wertherwinifred developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmtoidentifypatientswithmultiplemyelomausingadministrativeclaimsdata
AT lenhartgregory developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmtoidentifypatientswithmultiplemyelomausingadministrativeclaimsdata
AT foleykathleena developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmtoidentifypatientswithmultiplemyelomausingadministrativeclaimsdata