Cargando…

Umbilical Negative Pressure Dressing for Transumbilical Appendectomy in Childern

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) carries a high risk for surgical site infection. We investigated the effect of a bio-occlusive umbilical vacuum dressing on wound infection rates after TULAA for patients with acute appendicitis and compared to it w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seifarth, Federico G., Kundu, Neilendu, Guerron, Alfredo D., Garland, Mary M., Gaffley, Michaela W. G., Worley, Sarah, Knight, Colin G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5081401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27807398
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00070
_version_ 1782462884201103360
author Seifarth, Federico G.
Kundu, Neilendu
Guerron, Alfredo D.
Garland, Mary M.
Gaffley, Michaela W. G.
Worley, Sarah
Knight, Colin G.
author_facet Seifarth, Federico G.
Kundu, Neilendu
Guerron, Alfredo D.
Garland, Mary M.
Gaffley, Michaela W. G.
Worley, Sarah
Knight, Colin G.
author_sort Seifarth, Federico G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) carries a high risk for surgical site infection. We investigated the effect of a bio-occlusive umbilical vacuum dressing on wound infection rates after TULAA for patients with acute appendicitis and compared to it with a conventional 3-port appendectomy with a nonvacuum dressing. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of 1377 patients (2–20 years) undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in 2 tertiary care referral centers from January 2007 through December 2012. Twenty-two different operative technique/dressing variations were documented. The 6 technique/dressing groups with >50 patients were assessed, including a total of 1283 patients. RESULTS: The surgical site infection rate of the 220 patients treated with TULAA and application of an umbilical vacuum dressing with dry gauze is 1.8% (95% CI, 0.0–10.3%). This compares to an infection rate of 4.1% (95% CI, 1.3–10.5%) in 97 patients with dry dressing without vacuum. In the 395 patients who received an umbilical vacuum dressing with gauze and bacitracin, the surgical site infection rate was found to be 4.3% (95% CI, 2.7–6.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Application of an umbilical negative-pressure dressing with dry gauze lowers the rate of umbilical site infections in patients undergoing transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy for acute appendicitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5081401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50814012016-11-02 Umbilical Negative Pressure Dressing for Transumbilical Appendectomy in Childern Seifarth, Federico G. Kundu, Neilendu Guerron, Alfredo D. Garland, Mary M. Gaffley, Michaela W. G. Worley, Sarah Knight, Colin G. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) carries a high risk for surgical site infection. We investigated the effect of a bio-occlusive umbilical vacuum dressing on wound infection rates after TULAA for patients with acute appendicitis and compared to it with a conventional 3-port appendectomy with a nonvacuum dressing. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of 1377 patients (2–20 years) undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in 2 tertiary care referral centers from January 2007 through December 2012. Twenty-two different operative technique/dressing variations were documented. The 6 technique/dressing groups with >50 patients were assessed, including a total of 1283 patients. RESULTS: The surgical site infection rate of the 220 patients treated with TULAA and application of an umbilical vacuum dressing with dry gauze is 1.8% (95% CI, 0.0–10.3%). This compares to an infection rate of 4.1% (95% CI, 1.3–10.5%) in 97 patients with dry dressing without vacuum. In the 395 patients who received an umbilical vacuum dressing with gauze and bacitracin, the surgical site infection rate was found to be 4.3% (95% CI, 2.7–6.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Application of an umbilical negative-pressure dressing with dry gauze lowers the rate of umbilical site infections in patients undergoing transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5081401/ /pubmed/27807398 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00070 Text en © 2016 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Seifarth, Federico G.
Kundu, Neilendu
Guerron, Alfredo D.
Garland, Mary M.
Gaffley, Michaela W. G.
Worley, Sarah
Knight, Colin G.
Umbilical Negative Pressure Dressing for Transumbilical Appendectomy in Childern
title Umbilical Negative Pressure Dressing for Transumbilical Appendectomy in Childern
title_full Umbilical Negative Pressure Dressing for Transumbilical Appendectomy in Childern
title_fullStr Umbilical Negative Pressure Dressing for Transumbilical Appendectomy in Childern
title_full_unstemmed Umbilical Negative Pressure Dressing for Transumbilical Appendectomy in Childern
title_short Umbilical Negative Pressure Dressing for Transumbilical Appendectomy in Childern
title_sort umbilical negative pressure dressing for transumbilical appendectomy in childern
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5081401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27807398
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00070
work_keys_str_mv AT seifarthfedericog umbilicalnegativepressuredressingfortransumbilicalappendectomyinchildern
AT kunduneilendu umbilicalnegativepressuredressingfortransumbilicalappendectomyinchildern
AT guerronalfredod umbilicalnegativepressuredressingfortransumbilicalappendectomyinchildern
AT garlandmarym umbilicalnegativepressuredressingfortransumbilicalappendectomyinchildern
AT gaffleymichaelawg umbilicalnegativepressuredressingfortransumbilicalappendectomyinchildern
AT worleysarah umbilicalnegativepressuredressingfortransumbilicalappendectomyinchildern
AT knightcoling umbilicalnegativepressuredressingfortransumbilicalappendectomyinchildern