Cargando…

Analysing the Progression Rates of Macular Lesions with Autofluorescence Imaging Modes in Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration

OBJECTIVES: In this study we aimed to compare the sensitivity of blue-light fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and near-infrared autofluorescence (NI-AF) imaging for determining the progression rates of macular lesions in dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olcay, Kenan, Çakır, Akın, Sönmez, Murat, Düzgün, Eyüp, Yıldırım, Yıldıray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5082260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27800240
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.93276
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: In this study we aimed to compare the sensitivity of blue-light fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and near-infrared autofluorescence (NI-AF) imaging for determining the progression rates of macular lesions in dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed retrospectively and included patients diagnosed with intermediate and advanced stage dry AMD. Best corrected visual acuities and FAF and NI-AF images were recorded in 46 eyes of 33 patients. Lesion borders were drawn manually on the images using Heidelberg Eye Explorer software and lesion areas were calculated using Microsoft Excel software. BCVA and lesion areas were compared with each other. RESULTS: Patients’ mean follow-up time was 30.98±13.30 months. The lesion area progression rates were 0.85±0.93 mm2/y in FAF and 0.93±1.01 mm2/y in NI-AF, showing statistically significant correlation with each other (r=0.883; p<0.01). Both imaging methods are moderately correlated with visual acuity impairment (r=0.362; p<0.05 and r=0.311; p<0.05, respectively). In addition, larger lesions showed higher progression rates than smaller ones in both imaging methods. CONCLUSION: NI-AF imaging is as important and effective as FAF imaging for follow-up of dry AMD patients.