Cargando…
Modulation of the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy by Nitric Oxide
Nitric oxide (NO) produced by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) enzymes is a free radical molecule involved in a wide variety of normophysiologic and pathophysiologic processes. Included in the latter category are cancer promotion, progression, and resistance to therapeutic intervention. Animal tumor phot...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5082386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27775600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers8100096 |
_version_ | 1782463047498989568 |
---|---|
author | Girotti, Albert W. |
author_facet | Girotti, Albert W. |
author_sort | Girotti, Albert W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nitric oxide (NO) produced by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) enzymes is a free radical molecule involved in a wide variety of normophysiologic and pathophysiologic processes. Included in the latter category are cancer promotion, progression, and resistance to therapeutic intervention. Animal tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) studies several years ago revealed that endogenous NO can reduce PDT efficacy and that NOS inhibitors can alleviate this. Until relatively recently, little else was known about this anti-PDT effect of NO, including: (a) the underlying mechanisms; (b) type(s) of NOS involved; and (c) whether active NO was generated in vascular cells, tumor cells, or both. In addressing these questions for various cancer cell lines exposed to PDT-like conditions, the author’s group has made several novel findings, including: (i) exogenous NO can scavenge lipid-derived free radicals arising from photostress, thereby protecting cells from membrane-damaging chain peroxidation; (ii) cancer cells can upregulate inducible NOS (iNOS) after a PDT-like challenge and the resulting NO can signal for resistance to photokilling; (iii) photostress-surviving cells with elevated iNOS/NO proliferate and migrate/invade more aggressively; and (iv) NO produced by photostress-targeted cells can induce greater aggressiveness in non-targeted bystander cells. In this article, the author briefly discusses these various means by which NO can interfere with PDT and how this may be mitigated by use of NOS inhibitors as PDT adjuvants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5082386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50823862016-10-28 Modulation of the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy by Nitric Oxide Girotti, Albert W. Cancers (Basel) Review Nitric oxide (NO) produced by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) enzymes is a free radical molecule involved in a wide variety of normophysiologic and pathophysiologic processes. Included in the latter category are cancer promotion, progression, and resistance to therapeutic intervention. Animal tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) studies several years ago revealed that endogenous NO can reduce PDT efficacy and that NOS inhibitors can alleviate this. Until relatively recently, little else was known about this anti-PDT effect of NO, including: (a) the underlying mechanisms; (b) type(s) of NOS involved; and (c) whether active NO was generated in vascular cells, tumor cells, or both. In addressing these questions for various cancer cell lines exposed to PDT-like conditions, the author’s group has made several novel findings, including: (i) exogenous NO can scavenge lipid-derived free radicals arising from photostress, thereby protecting cells from membrane-damaging chain peroxidation; (ii) cancer cells can upregulate inducible NOS (iNOS) after a PDT-like challenge and the resulting NO can signal for resistance to photokilling; (iii) photostress-surviving cells with elevated iNOS/NO proliferate and migrate/invade more aggressively; and (iv) NO produced by photostress-targeted cells can induce greater aggressiveness in non-targeted bystander cells. In this article, the author briefly discusses these various means by which NO can interfere with PDT and how this may be mitigated by use of NOS inhibitors as PDT adjuvants. MDPI 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5082386/ /pubmed/27775600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers8100096 Text en © 2016 by the author; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Girotti, Albert W. Modulation of the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy by Nitric Oxide |
title | Modulation of the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy by Nitric Oxide |
title_full | Modulation of the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy by Nitric Oxide |
title_fullStr | Modulation of the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy by Nitric Oxide |
title_full_unstemmed | Modulation of the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy by Nitric Oxide |
title_short | Modulation of the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy by Nitric Oxide |
title_sort | modulation of the anti-tumor efficacy of photodynamic therapy by nitric oxide |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5082386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27775600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers8100096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT girottialbertw modulationoftheantitumorefficacyofphotodynamictherapybynitricoxide |