Cargando…

Correction of inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R1 mapping by accounting for receive coil sensitivity effects

PURPOSE: Inter‐scan motion causes differential receive field modulation between scans, leading to errors when they are combined to quantify MRI parameters. We present a robust and efficient method that accounts for inter‐scan motion by removing this modulation before parameter quantification. THEORY...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papp, Daniel, Callaghan, Martina F., Meyer, Heiko, Buckley, Craig, Weiskopf, Nikolaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5082493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26608936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26058
_version_ 1782463068191588352
author Papp, Daniel
Callaghan, Martina F.
Meyer, Heiko
Buckley, Craig
Weiskopf, Nikolaus
author_facet Papp, Daniel
Callaghan, Martina F.
Meyer, Heiko
Buckley, Craig
Weiskopf, Nikolaus
author_sort Papp, Daniel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Inter‐scan motion causes differential receive field modulation between scans, leading to errors when they are combined to quantify MRI parameters. We present a robust and efficient method that accounts for inter‐scan motion by removing this modulation before parameter quantification. THEORY AND METHODS: Five participants moved between two high‐resolution structural scans acquired with different flip angles. Before each high‐resolution scan, the effective relative sensitivity of the receive head coil was estimated by combining two rapid low‐resolution scans acquired receiving on each of the body and head coils. All data were co‐registered and sensitivity variations were removed from the high‐resolution scans by division with the effective relative sensitivity. R1 maps with and without this correction were calculated and compared against reference maps unaffected by inter‐scan motion. RESULTS: Even after coregistration, inter‐scan motion significantly biased the R1 maps, leading to spurious variation in R1 in brain tissue and deviations with respect to a no‐motion reference. The proposed correction scheme reduced the error to within the typical scan–rescan error observed in datasets unaffected by motion. CONCLUSION: Inter‐scan motion negatively impacts the accuracy and precision of R1 mapping. We present a validated correction method that accounts for position‐specific receive field modulation. Magn Reson Med 76:1478–1485, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5082493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50824932016-11-09 Correction of inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R1 mapping by accounting for receive coil sensitivity effects Papp, Daniel Callaghan, Martina F. Meyer, Heiko Buckley, Craig Weiskopf, Nikolaus Magn Reson Med Imaging Methodology—Full Papers PURPOSE: Inter‐scan motion causes differential receive field modulation between scans, leading to errors when they are combined to quantify MRI parameters. We present a robust and efficient method that accounts for inter‐scan motion by removing this modulation before parameter quantification. THEORY AND METHODS: Five participants moved between two high‐resolution structural scans acquired with different flip angles. Before each high‐resolution scan, the effective relative sensitivity of the receive head coil was estimated by combining two rapid low‐resolution scans acquired receiving on each of the body and head coils. All data were co‐registered and sensitivity variations were removed from the high‐resolution scans by division with the effective relative sensitivity. R1 maps with and without this correction were calculated and compared against reference maps unaffected by inter‐scan motion. RESULTS: Even after coregistration, inter‐scan motion significantly biased the R1 maps, leading to spurious variation in R1 in brain tissue and deviations with respect to a no‐motion reference. The proposed correction scheme reduced the error to within the typical scan–rescan error observed in datasets unaffected by motion. CONCLUSION: Inter‐scan motion negatively impacts the accuracy and precision of R1 mapping. We present a validated correction method that accounts for position‐specific receive field modulation. Magn Reson Med 76:1478–1485, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-26 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5082493/ /pubmed/26608936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26058 Text en © The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Imaging Methodology—Full Papers
Papp, Daniel
Callaghan, Martina F.
Meyer, Heiko
Buckley, Craig
Weiskopf, Nikolaus
Correction of inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R1 mapping by accounting for receive coil sensitivity effects
title Correction of inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R1 mapping by accounting for receive coil sensitivity effects
title_full Correction of inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R1 mapping by accounting for receive coil sensitivity effects
title_fullStr Correction of inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R1 mapping by accounting for receive coil sensitivity effects
title_full_unstemmed Correction of inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R1 mapping by accounting for receive coil sensitivity effects
title_short Correction of inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R1 mapping by accounting for receive coil sensitivity effects
title_sort correction of inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative r1 mapping by accounting for receive coil sensitivity effects
topic Imaging Methodology—Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5082493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26608936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26058
work_keys_str_mv AT pappdaniel correctionofinterscanmotionartifactsinquantitativer1mappingbyaccountingforreceivecoilsensitivityeffects
AT callaghanmartinaf correctionofinterscanmotionartifactsinquantitativer1mappingbyaccountingforreceivecoilsensitivityeffects
AT meyerheiko correctionofinterscanmotionartifactsinquantitativer1mappingbyaccountingforreceivecoilsensitivityeffects
AT buckleycraig correctionofinterscanmotionartifactsinquantitativer1mappingbyaccountingforreceivecoilsensitivityeffects
AT weiskopfnikolaus correctionofinterscanmotionartifactsinquantitativer1mappingbyaccountingforreceivecoilsensitivityeffects