Cargando…

Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers

OBJECTIVE: Inequalities exist in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake, with people from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds less likely to participate. Identifying the facilitators and barriers to screening uptake is important to addressing screening disparities. We pooled data from 2 trials...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, S.G., McGregor, L.M., Raine, R., Wardle, J., von Wagner, C., Robb, K.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5082500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27309861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.4195
_version_ 1782463069852532736
author Smith, S.G.
McGregor, L.M.
Raine, R.
Wardle, J.
von Wagner, C.
Robb, K.A.
author_facet Smith, S.G.
McGregor, L.M.
Raine, R.
Wardle, J.
von Wagner, C.
Robb, K.A.
author_sort Smith, S.G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Inequalities exist in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake, with people from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds less likely to participate. Identifying the facilitators and barriers to screening uptake is important to addressing screening disparities. We pooled data from 2 trials to examine educational differences in psychological constructs related to guaiac fecal occult blood testing. METHODS: Patients (n = 8576) registered at 7 general practices in England, within 15 years of the eligible age range for screening (45‐59.5 years), were invited to complete a questionnaire. Measures included perceived barriers (emotional and practical) and benefits of screening, screening intentions, and participant characteristics including education. RESULTS: After data pooling, 2181 responses were included. People with high school education or no formal education reported higher emotional and practical barriers and were less likely to definitely intend to participate in screening, compared with university graduates in analyses controlling for study arm and participant characteristics. The belief that one would worry more about CRC after screening and concerns about tempting fate were strongly negatively associated with education. In a model including education and participant characteristics, respondents with low emotional barriers, low practical barriers, and high perceived benefits were more likely to definitely intend to take part in screening. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of adults approaching the CRC screening age, there was a consistent effect of education on perceived barriers toward guaiac fecal occult blood testing, which could affect screening decision making. Interventions should target specific barriers to reduce educational disparities in screening uptake and avoid exacerbating inequalities in CRC mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5082500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50825002016-11-09 Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers Smith, S.G. McGregor, L.M. Raine, R. Wardle, J. von Wagner, C. Robb, K.A. Psychooncology Papers OBJECTIVE: Inequalities exist in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake, with people from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds less likely to participate. Identifying the facilitators and barriers to screening uptake is important to addressing screening disparities. We pooled data from 2 trials to examine educational differences in psychological constructs related to guaiac fecal occult blood testing. METHODS: Patients (n = 8576) registered at 7 general practices in England, within 15 years of the eligible age range for screening (45‐59.5 years), were invited to complete a questionnaire. Measures included perceived barriers (emotional and practical) and benefits of screening, screening intentions, and participant characteristics including education. RESULTS: After data pooling, 2181 responses were included. People with high school education or no formal education reported higher emotional and practical barriers and were less likely to definitely intend to participate in screening, compared with university graduates in analyses controlling for study arm and participant characteristics. The belief that one would worry more about CRC after screening and concerns about tempting fate were strongly negatively associated with education. In a model including education and participant characteristics, respondents with low emotional barriers, low practical barriers, and high perceived benefits were more likely to definitely intend to take part in screening. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of adults approaching the CRC screening age, there was a consistent effect of education on perceived barriers toward guaiac fecal occult blood testing, which could affect screening decision making. Interventions should target specific barriers to reduce educational disparities in screening uptake and avoid exacerbating inequalities in CRC mortality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-14 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5082500/ /pubmed/27309861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.4195 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Papers
Smith, S.G.
McGregor, L.M.
Raine, R.
Wardle, J.
von Wagner, C.
Robb, K.A.
Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers
title Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers
title_full Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers
title_fullStr Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers
title_full_unstemmed Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers
title_short Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers
title_sort inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers
topic Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5082500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27309861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.4195
work_keys_str_mv AT smithsg inequalitiesincancerscreeningparticipationexaminingdifferencesinperceivedbenefitsandbarriers
AT mcgregorlm inequalitiesincancerscreeningparticipationexaminingdifferencesinperceivedbenefitsandbarriers
AT rainer inequalitiesincancerscreeningparticipationexaminingdifferencesinperceivedbenefitsandbarriers
AT wardlej inequalitiesincancerscreeningparticipationexaminingdifferencesinperceivedbenefitsandbarriers
AT vonwagnerc inequalitiesincancerscreeningparticipationexaminingdifferencesinperceivedbenefitsandbarriers
AT robbka inequalitiesincancerscreeningparticipationexaminingdifferencesinperceivedbenefitsandbarriers