Cargando…

The genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in Drosophila

Variation in susceptibility to infection has a substantial genetic component in natural populations, and it has been argued that selection by pathogens may result in it having a simpler genetic architecture than many other quantitative traits. This is important as models of host–pathogen co‐evolutio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cogni, Rodrigo, Cao, Chuan, Day, Jonathan P., Bridson, Calum, Jiggins, Francis M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5082504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27460507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13769
_version_ 1782463070783668224
author Cogni, Rodrigo
Cao, Chuan
Day, Jonathan P.
Bridson, Calum
Jiggins, Francis M.
author_facet Cogni, Rodrigo
Cao, Chuan
Day, Jonathan P.
Bridson, Calum
Jiggins, Francis M.
author_sort Cogni, Rodrigo
collection PubMed
description Variation in susceptibility to infection has a substantial genetic component in natural populations, and it has been argued that selection by pathogens may result in it having a simpler genetic architecture than many other quantitative traits. This is important as models of host–pathogen co‐evolution typically assume resistance is controlled by a small number of genes. Using the Drosophila melanogaster multiparent advanced intercross, we investigated the genetic architecture of resistance to two naturally occurring viruses, the sigma virus and DCV (Drosophila C virus). We found extensive genetic variation in resistance to both viruses. For DCV resistance, this variation is largely caused by two major‐effect loci. Sigma virus resistance involves more genes – we mapped five loci, and together these explained less than half the genetic variance. Nonetheless, several of these had a large effect on resistance. Models of co‐evolution typically assume strong epistatic interactions between polymorphisms controlling resistance, but we were only able to detect one locus that altered the effect of the main effect loci we had mapped. Most of the loci we mapped were probably at an intermediate frequency in natural populations. Overall, our results are consistent with major‐effect genes commonly affecting susceptibility to infectious diseases, with DCV resistance being a near‐Mendelian trait.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5082504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50825042016-11-09 The genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in Drosophila Cogni, Rodrigo Cao, Chuan Day, Jonathan P. Bridson, Calum Jiggins, Francis M. Mol Ecol ORIGINAL ARTICLES Variation in susceptibility to infection has a substantial genetic component in natural populations, and it has been argued that selection by pathogens may result in it having a simpler genetic architecture than many other quantitative traits. This is important as models of host–pathogen co‐evolution typically assume resistance is controlled by a small number of genes. Using the Drosophila melanogaster multiparent advanced intercross, we investigated the genetic architecture of resistance to two naturally occurring viruses, the sigma virus and DCV (Drosophila C virus). We found extensive genetic variation in resistance to both viruses. For DCV resistance, this variation is largely caused by two major‐effect loci. Sigma virus resistance involves more genes – we mapped five loci, and together these explained less than half the genetic variance. Nonetheless, several of these had a large effect on resistance. Models of co‐evolution typically assume strong epistatic interactions between polymorphisms controlling resistance, but we were only able to detect one locus that altered the effect of the main effect loci we had mapped. Most of the loci we mapped were probably at an intermediate frequency in natural populations. Overall, our results are consistent with major‐effect genes commonly affecting susceptibility to infectious diseases, with DCV resistance being a near‐Mendelian trait. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-08-26 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5082504/ /pubmed/27460507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13769 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Cogni, Rodrigo
Cao, Chuan
Day, Jonathan P.
Bridson, Calum
Jiggins, Francis M.
The genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in Drosophila
title The genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in Drosophila
title_full The genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in Drosophila
title_fullStr The genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed The genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in Drosophila
title_short The genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in Drosophila
title_sort genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in drosophila
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5082504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27460507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13769
work_keys_str_mv AT cognirodrigo thegeneticarchitectureofresistancetovirusinfectionindrosophila
AT caochuan thegeneticarchitectureofresistancetovirusinfectionindrosophila
AT dayjonathanp thegeneticarchitectureofresistancetovirusinfectionindrosophila
AT bridsoncalum thegeneticarchitectureofresistancetovirusinfectionindrosophila
AT jigginsfrancism thegeneticarchitectureofresistancetovirusinfectionindrosophila
AT cognirodrigo geneticarchitectureofresistancetovirusinfectionindrosophila
AT caochuan geneticarchitectureofresistancetovirusinfectionindrosophila
AT dayjonathanp geneticarchitectureofresistancetovirusinfectionindrosophila
AT bridsoncalum geneticarchitectureofresistancetovirusinfectionindrosophila
AT jigginsfrancism geneticarchitectureofresistancetovirusinfectionindrosophila