Cargando…

Life‐cycle and cost of goods assessment of fed‐batch and perfusion‐based manufacturing processes for mAbs

Life‐cycle assessment (LCA) is an environmental assessment tool that quantifies the environmental impact associated with a product or a process (e.g., water consumption, energy requirements, and solid waste generation). While LCA is a standard approach in many commercial industries, its application...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bunnak, Phumthep, Allmendinger, Richard, Ramasamy, Sri V., Lettieri, Paola, Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5082523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2323
_version_ 1782463072617627648
author Bunnak, Phumthep
Allmendinger, Richard
Ramasamy, Sri V.
Lettieri, Paola
Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J.
author_facet Bunnak, Phumthep
Allmendinger, Richard
Ramasamy, Sri V.
Lettieri, Paola
Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J.
author_sort Bunnak, Phumthep
collection PubMed
description Life‐cycle assessment (LCA) is an environmental assessment tool that quantifies the environmental impact associated with a product or a process (e.g., water consumption, energy requirements, and solid waste generation). While LCA is a standard approach in many commercial industries, its application has not been exploited widely in the bioprocessing sector. To contribute toward the design of more cost‐efficient, robust and environmentally‐friendly manufacturing process for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a framework consisting of an LCA and economic analysis combined with a sensitivity analysis of manufacturing process parameters and a production scale‐up study is presented. The efficiency of the framework is demonstrated using a comparative study of the two most commonly used upstream configurations for mAb manufacture, namely fed‐batch (FB) and perfusion‐based processes. Results obtained by the framework are presented using a range of visualization tools, and indicate that a standard perfusion process (with a pooling duration of 4 days) has similar cost of goods than a FB process but a larger environmental footprint because it consumed 35% more water, demanded 17% more energy, and emitted 17% more CO(2) than the FB process. Water consumption was the most important impact category, especially when scaling‐up the processes, as energy was required to produce process water and water‐for‐injection, while CO(2) was emitted from energy generation. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the perfusion process can be made more environmentally‐friendly than the FB process if the pooling duration is extended to 8 days. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 32:1324–1335, 2016
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5082523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50825232016-11-09 Life‐cycle and cost of goods assessment of fed‐batch and perfusion‐based manufacturing processes for mAbs Bunnak, Phumthep Allmendinger, Richard Ramasamy, Sri V. Lettieri, Paola Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J. Biotechnol Prog Research Articles Life‐cycle assessment (LCA) is an environmental assessment tool that quantifies the environmental impact associated with a product or a process (e.g., water consumption, energy requirements, and solid waste generation). While LCA is a standard approach in many commercial industries, its application has not been exploited widely in the bioprocessing sector. To contribute toward the design of more cost‐efficient, robust and environmentally‐friendly manufacturing process for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a framework consisting of an LCA and economic analysis combined with a sensitivity analysis of manufacturing process parameters and a production scale‐up study is presented. The efficiency of the framework is demonstrated using a comparative study of the two most commonly used upstream configurations for mAb manufacture, namely fed‐batch (FB) and perfusion‐based processes. Results obtained by the framework are presented using a range of visualization tools, and indicate that a standard perfusion process (with a pooling duration of 4 days) has similar cost of goods than a FB process but a larger environmental footprint because it consumed 35% more water, demanded 17% more energy, and emitted 17% more CO(2) than the FB process. Water consumption was the most important impact category, especially when scaling‐up the processes, as energy was required to produce process water and water‐for‐injection, while CO(2) was emitted from energy generation. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the perfusion process can be made more environmentally‐friendly than the FB process if the pooling duration is extended to 8 days. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 32:1324–1335, 2016 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-28 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5082523/ /pubmed/27390260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2323 Text en © 2016 The Authors Biotechnology Progress published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Institute of Chemical Engineers. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Bunnak, Phumthep
Allmendinger, Richard
Ramasamy, Sri V.
Lettieri, Paola
Titchener‐Hooker, Nigel J.
Life‐cycle and cost of goods assessment of fed‐batch and perfusion‐based manufacturing processes for mAbs
title Life‐cycle and cost of goods assessment of fed‐batch and perfusion‐based manufacturing processes for mAbs
title_full Life‐cycle and cost of goods assessment of fed‐batch and perfusion‐based manufacturing processes for mAbs
title_fullStr Life‐cycle and cost of goods assessment of fed‐batch and perfusion‐based manufacturing processes for mAbs
title_full_unstemmed Life‐cycle and cost of goods assessment of fed‐batch and perfusion‐based manufacturing processes for mAbs
title_short Life‐cycle and cost of goods assessment of fed‐batch and perfusion‐based manufacturing processes for mAbs
title_sort life‐cycle and cost of goods assessment of fed‐batch and perfusion‐based manufacturing processes for mabs
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5082523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2323
work_keys_str_mv AT bunnakphumthep lifecycleandcostofgoodsassessmentoffedbatchandperfusionbasedmanufacturingprocessesformabs
AT allmendingerrichard lifecycleandcostofgoodsassessmentoffedbatchandperfusionbasedmanufacturingprocessesformabs
AT ramasamysriv lifecycleandcostofgoodsassessmentoffedbatchandperfusionbasedmanufacturingprocessesformabs
AT lettieripaola lifecycleandcostofgoodsassessmentoffedbatchandperfusionbasedmanufacturingprocessesformabs
AT titchenerhookernigelj lifecycleandcostofgoodsassessmentoffedbatchandperfusionbasedmanufacturingprocessesformabs