Cargando…

Screening mammography: sparing the emperor's blushes

Differing interpretations about evidence on benefits and harms of screening mammography has led to conflicting recommendations among different jurisdictions that range from intensive screening starting at age 40 to no screening at all. Despite broad attention of scientific and nonscientific media, e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Niraula, Saroj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5083754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.859
_version_ 1782463272317878272
author Niraula, Saroj
author_facet Niraula, Saroj
author_sort Niraula, Saroj
collection PubMed
description Differing interpretations about evidence on benefits and harms of screening mammography has led to conflicting recommendations among different jurisdictions that range from intensive screening starting at age 40 to no screening at all. Despite broad attention of scientific and nonscientific media, evidence suggests substantial discrepancy between real and perceived benefits of screening mammography among women. In this commentary, underlying concept of mammographic screening, limitations in primary evidence, results from secondary evidence, and existing misunderstandings are underscored with a critical gaze at available information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5083754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50837542016-10-31 Screening mammography: sparing the emperor's blushes Niraula, Saroj Cancer Med Cancer Prevention Differing interpretations about evidence on benefits and harms of screening mammography has led to conflicting recommendations among different jurisdictions that range from intensive screening starting at age 40 to no screening at all. Despite broad attention of scientific and nonscientific media, evidence suggests substantial discrepancy between real and perceived benefits of screening mammography among women. In this commentary, underlying concept of mammographic screening, limitations in primary evidence, results from secondary evidence, and existing misunderstandings are underscored with a critical gaze at available information. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5083754/ /pubmed/27683022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.859 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Prevention
Niraula, Saroj
Screening mammography: sparing the emperor's blushes
title Screening mammography: sparing the emperor's blushes
title_full Screening mammography: sparing the emperor's blushes
title_fullStr Screening mammography: sparing the emperor's blushes
title_full_unstemmed Screening mammography: sparing the emperor's blushes
title_short Screening mammography: sparing the emperor's blushes
title_sort screening mammography: sparing the emperor's blushes
topic Cancer Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5083754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.859
work_keys_str_mv AT niraulasaroj screeningmammographysparingtheemperorsblushes