Cargando…
Technique for Measuring Limb Occlusion Pressure that Facilitates Personalized Tourniquet Systems: A Randomized Trial
We developed a technique for measuring patient limb occlusion pressure (LOP) through a tourniquet cuff that overcomes many limitations of existing LOP measurement techniques. The purpose of the study is to determine whether the LOP measured by the proposed technique is statistically or clinically di...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5083760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0173-5 |
_version_ | 1782463273768058880 |
---|---|
author | Masri, Bassam A. Day, Brian Younger, Alastair S. E. Jeyasurya, Jeswin |
author_facet | Masri, Bassam A. Day, Brian Younger, Alastair S. E. Jeyasurya, Jeswin |
author_sort | Masri, Bassam A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We developed a technique for measuring patient limb occlusion pressure (LOP) through a tourniquet cuff that overcomes many limitations of existing LOP measurement techniques. The purpose of the study is to determine whether the LOP measured by the proposed technique is statistically or clinically different from that measured by the gold standard Doppler ultrasound technique. The study used randomized crossover multicenter trials. 143 pre- and post-surgical patients with a mean age of 54 years (range 17–86 years) were enrolled in the study. Pneumatic cuffs were applied to the non-operative upper and lower limbs and LOP was measured using the proposed technique and the Doppler ultrasound technique. From a total of 252 usable measurements for each technique (134 for upper limbs and 118 for lower limbs), the mean difference in LOP between the two techniques was 1 ± 8 mmHg for the upper limbs, 0 ± 15 mmHg for the lower limbs, and 1 ± 12 mmHg overall. The differences between the proposed technique and the Doppler technique were neither statistically nor clinically significant. The simplicity, effectiveness, and accuracy of the proposed technique should lead to broader clinical usage and acceptance of LOP measurement, thus leading to safer, personalized pressures in surgical tourniquet applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5083760 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50837602016-11-14 Technique for Measuring Limb Occlusion Pressure that Facilitates Personalized Tourniquet Systems: A Randomized Trial Masri, Bassam A. Day, Brian Younger, Alastair S. E. Jeyasurya, Jeswin J Med Biol Eng Original Article We developed a technique for measuring patient limb occlusion pressure (LOP) through a tourniquet cuff that overcomes many limitations of existing LOP measurement techniques. The purpose of the study is to determine whether the LOP measured by the proposed technique is statistically or clinically different from that measured by the gold standard Doppler ultrasound technique. The study used randomized crossover multicenter trials. 143 pre- and post-surgical patients with a mean age of 54 years (range 17–86 years) were enrolled in the study. Pneumatic cuffs were applied to the non-operative upper and lower limbs and LOP was measured using the proposed technique and the Doppler ultrasound technique. From a total of 252 usable measurements for each technique (134 for upper limbs and 118 for lower limbs), the mean difference in LOP between the two techniques was 1 ± 8 mmHg for the upper limbs, 0 ± 15 mmHg for the lower limbs, and 1 ± 12 mmHg overall. The differences between the proposed technique and the Doppler technique were neither statistically nor clinically significant. The simplicity, effectiveness, and accuracy of the proposed technique should lead to broader clinical usage and acceptance of LOP measurement, thus leading to safer, personalized pressures in surgical tourniquet applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-10-04 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5083760/ /pubmed/27853415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0173-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Masri, Bassam A. Day, Brian Younger, Alastair S. E. Jeyasurya, Jeswin Technique for Measuring Limb Occlusion Pressure that Facilitates Personalized Tourniquet Systems: A Randomized Trial |
title | Technique for Measuring Limb Occlusion Pressure that Facilitates Personalized Tourniquet Systems: A Randomized Trial |
title_full | Technique for Measuring Limb Occlusion Pressure that Facilitates Personalized Tourniquet Systems: A Randomized Trial |
title_fullStr | Technique for Measuring Limb Occlusion Pressure that Facilitates Personalized Tourniquet Systems: A Randomized Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Technique for Measuring Limb Occlusion Pressure that Facilitates Personalized Tourniquet Systems: A Randomized Trial |
title_short | Technique for Measuring Limb Occlusion Pressure that Facilitates Personalized Tourniquet Systems: A Randomized Trial |
title_sort | technique for measuring limb occlusion pressure that facilitates personalized tourniquet systems: a randomized trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5083760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0173-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masribassama techniqueformeasuringlimbocclusionpressurethatfacilitatespersonalizedtourniquetsystemsarandomizedtrial AT daybrian techniqueformeasuringlimbocclusionpressurethatfacilitatespersonalizedtourniquetsystemsarandomizedtrial AT youngeralastairse techniqueformeasuringlimbocclusionpressurethatfacilitatespersonalizedtourniquetsystemsarandomizedtrial AT jeyasuryajeswin techniqueformeasuringlimbocclusionpressurethatfacilitatespersonalizedtourniquetsystemsarandomizedtrial |