Cargando…

Multidisciplinary Consideration of Potential Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Paradoxical Erythema with Topical Brimonidine Therapy

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease with transient and non-transient redness as key characteristics. Brimonidine is a selective α2-adrenergic receptor (AR) agonist approved for persistent facial erythema of rosacea based on significant efficacy and good safety data. The majority of patients tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Docherty, James R., Steinhoff, Martin, Lorton, Dianne, Detmar, Michael, Schäfer, Gregor, Holmes, Anna, Di Nardo, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5083782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27562835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0404-8
_version_ 1782463279375843328
author Docherty, James R.
Steinhoff, Martin
Lorton, Dianne
Detmar, Michael
Schäfer, Gregor
Holmes, Anna
Di Nardo, Anna
author_facet Docherty, James R.
Steinhoff, Martin
Lorton, Dianne
Detmar, Michael
Schäfer, Gregor
Holmes, Anna
Di Nardo, Anna
author_sort Docherty, James R.
collection PubMed
description Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease with transient and non-transient redness as key characteristics. Brimonidine is a selective α2-adrenergic receptor (AR) agonist approved for persistent facial erythema of rosacea based on significant efficacy and good safety data. The majority of patients treated with brimonidine report a benefit; however, there have been sporadic reports of worsening erythema after the initial response. A group of dermatologists, receptor physiology, and neuroimmunology scientists met to explore potential mechanisms contributing to side effects as well as differences in efficacy. We propose the following could contribute to erythema after application: (1) local inflammation and perivascular inflammatory cells with abnormally functioning ARs may lead to vasodilatation; (2) abnormal saturation and cells expressing different AR subtypes with varying ligand affinity; (3) barrier dysfunction and increased skin concentrations of brimonidine with increased actions at endothelial and presynaptic receptors, resulting in increased vasodilation; and (4) genetic predisposition and receptor polymorphism(s) leading to different smooth muscle responses. Approximately 80% of patients treated with brimonidine experience a significant improvement without erythema worsening as an adverse event. Attention to optimizing skin barrier function, setting patient expectations, and strategies to minimize potential problems may possibly reduce further the number of patients who experience side effects. Funding: Galderma International S.A.S., Paris, France.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5083782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50837822016-11-14 Multidisciplinary Consideration of Potential Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Paradoxical Erythema with Topical Brimonidine Therapy Docherty, James R. Steinhoff, Martin Lorton, Dianne Detmar, Michael Schäfer, Gregor Holmes, Anna Di Nardo, Anna Adv Ther Review Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease with transient and non-transient redness as key characteristics. Brimonidine is a selective α2-adrenergic receptor (AR) agonist approved for persistent facial erythema of rosacea based on significant efficacy and good safety data. The majority of patients treated with brimonidine report a benefit; however, there have been sporadic reports of worsening erythema after the initial response. A group of dermatologists, receptor physiology, and neuroimmunology scientists met to explore potential mechanisms contributing to side effects as well as differences in efficacy. We propose the following could contribute to erythema after application: (1) local inflammation and perivascular inflammatory cells with abnormally functioning ARs may lead to vasodilatation; (2) abnormal saturation and cells expressing different AR subtypes with varying ligand affinity; (3) barrier dysfunction and increased skin concentrations of brimonidine with increased actions at endothelial and presynaptic receptors, resulting in increased vasodilation; and (4) genetic predisposition and receptor polymorphism(s) leading to different smooth muscle responses. Approximately 80% of patients treated with brimonidine experience a significant improvement without erythema worsening as an adverse event. Attention to optimizing skin barrier function, setting patient expectations, and strategies to minimize potential problems may possibly reduce further the number of patients who experience side effects. Funding: Galderma International S.A.S., Paris, France. Springer Healthcare 2016-08-25 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5083782/ /pubmed/27562835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0404-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Docherty, James R.
Steinhoff, Martin
Lorton, Dianne
Detmar, Michael
Schäfer, Gregor
Holmes, Anna
Di Nardo, Anna
Multidisciplinary Consideration of Potential Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Paradoxical Erythema with Topical Brimonidine Therapy
title Multidisciplinary Consideration of Potential Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Paradoxical Erythema with Topical Brimonidine Therapy
title_full Multidisciplinary Consideration of Potential Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Paradoxical Erythema with Topical Brimonidine Therapy
title_fullStr Multidisciplinary Consideration of Potential Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Paradoxical Erythema with Topical Brimonidine Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Multidisciplinary Consideration of Potential Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Paradoxical Erythema with Topical Brimonidine Therapy
title_short Multidisciplinary Consideration of Potential Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Paradoxical Erythema with Topical Brimonidine Therapy
title_sort multidisciplinary consideration of potential pathophysiologic mechanisms of paradoxical erythema with topical brimonidine therapy
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5083782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27562835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0404-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dochertyjamesr multidisciplinaryconsiderationofpotentialpathophysiologicmechanismsofparadoxicalerythemawithtopicalbrimonidinetherapy
AT steinhoffmartin multidisciplinaryconsiderationofpotentialpathophysiologicmechanismsofparadoxicalerythemawithtopicalbrimonidinetherapy
AT lortondianne multidisciplinaryconsiderationofpotentialpathophysiologicmechanismsofparadoxicalerythemawithtopicalbrimonidinetherapy
AT detmarmichael multidisciplinaryconsiderationofpotentialpathophysiologicmechanismsofparadoxicalerythemawithtopicalbrimonidinetherapy
AT schafergregor multidisciplinaryconsiderationofpotentialpathophysiologicmechanismsofparadoxicalerythemawithtopicalbrimonidinetherapy
AT holmesanna multidisciplinaryconsiderationofpotentialpathophysiologicmechanismsofparadoxicalerythemawithtopicalbrimonidinetherapy
AT dinardoanna multidisciplinaryconsiderationofpotentialpathophysiologicmechanismsofparadoxicalerythemawithtopicalbrimonidinetherapy