Cargando…

Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006–2012: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND: Women, who have been subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM), can suffer serious and irreversible physical, psychological and psychosexual complications. They have more adverse obstetric outcomes as compared to women without FGM. Exploratory studies suggest radical change to abandon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varol, Nesrin, Dawson, Angela, Turkmani, Sabera, Hall, John J., Nanayakkara, Susie, Jenkins, Greg, Homer, Caroline S. E., McGeechan, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27793119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1123-5
_version_ 1782463355045281792
author Varol, Nesrin
Dawson, Angela
Turkmani, Sabera
Hall, John J.
Nanayakkara, Susie
Jenkins, Greg
Homer, Caroline S. E.
McGeechan, Kevin
author_facet Varol, Nesrin
Dawson, Angela
Turkmani, Sabera
Hall, John J.
Nanayakkara, Susie
Jenkins, Greg
Homer, Caroline S. E.
McGeechan, Kevin
author_sort Varol, Nesrin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women, who have been subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM), can suffer serious and irreversible physical, psychological and psychosexual complications. They have more adverse obstetric outcomes as compared to women without FGM. Exploratory studies suggest radical change to abandonment of FGM by communities after migration to countries where FGM is not prevalent. Women who had been subjected to FGM as a child in their countries of origin, require specialised healthcare to reduce complications and further suffering. Our study compared obstetric outcomes in women with FGM to women without FGM who gave birth in a metropolitan Australian hospital with expertise in holistic FGM management. METHODS: The obstetric outcomes of one hundred and ninety-six women with FGM who gave birth between 2006 and 2012 at a metropolitan Australian hospital were analysed. Comparison was made with 8852 women without FGM who gave birth during the same time period. Data were extracted from a database specifically designed for women with FGM and managed by midwives specialised in care of these women, and a routine obstetric database, ObstetriX. The accuracy of data collection on FGM was determined by comparing these two databases. All women with FGM type 3 were deinfibulated antenatally or during labour. The outcome measures were (1) maternal: accuracy and grade of FGM classification, caesarean section, instrumental birth, episiotomy, genital tract trauma, postpartum blood loss of more than 500 ml; and (2) neonatal: low birth weight, admission to a special care nursery, stillbirth. RESULTS: The prevalence of FGM in women who gave birth at the metropolitan hospital was 2 to 3 %. Women with FGM had similar obstetric outcomes to women without FGM, except for statistically significant higher risk of first and second degree perineal tears, and caesarean section. However, none of the caesarean sections were performed for FGM indications. The ObstetriX database was only 35 % accurate in recording the correct FGM type. CONCLUSION: Women with FGM had similar obstetric outcomes to women without FGM in an Australian metropolitan hospital with expertise in FGM management. Specialised FGM services with clinical practice guideline and education of healthcare professionals may increase the detection rate of FGM and improve obstetric management of women with FGM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1123-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5084319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50843192016-10-28 Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006–2012: a descriptive study Varol, Nesrin Dawson, Angela Turkmani, Sabera Hall, John J. Nanayakkara, Susie Jenkins, Greg Homer, Caroline S. E. McGeechan, Kevin BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Women, who have been subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM), can suffer serious and irreversible physical, psychological and psychosexual complications. They have more adverse obstetric outcomes as compared to women without FGM. Exploratory studies suggest radical change to abandonment of FGM by communities after migration to countries where FGM is not prevalent. Women who had been subjected to FGM as a child in their countries of origin, require specialised healthcare to reduce complications and further suffering. Our study compared obstetric outcomes in women with FGM to women without FGM who gave birth in a metropolitan Australian hospital with expertise in holistic FGM management. METHODS: The obstetric outcomes of one hundred and ninety-six women with FGM who gave birth between 2006 and 2012 at a metropolitan Australian hospital were analysed. Comparison was made with 8852 women without FGM who gave birth during the same time period. Data were extracted from a database specifically designed for women with FGM and managed by midwives specialised in care of these women, and a routine obstetric database, ObstetriX. The accuracy of data collection on FGM was determined by comparing these two databases. All women with FGM type 3 were deinfibulated antenatally or during labour. The outcome measures were (1) maternal: accuracy and grade of FGM classification, caesarean section, instrumental birth, episiotomy, genital tract trauma, postpartum blood loss of more than 500 ml; and (2) neonatal: low birth weight, admission to a special care nursery, stillbirth. RESULTS: The prevalence of FGM in women who gave birth at the metropolitan hospital was 2 to 3 %. Women with FGM had similar obstetric outcomes to women without FGM, except for statistically significant higher risk of first and second degree perineal tears, and caesarean section. However, none of the caesarean sections were performed for FGM indications. The ObstetriX database was only 35 % accurate in recording the correct FGM type. CONCLUSION: Women with FGM had similar obstetric outcomes to women without FGM in an Australian metropolitan hospital with expertise in FGM management. Specialised FGM services with clinical practice guideline and education of healthcare professionals may increase the detection rate of FGM and improve obstetric management of women with FGM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1123-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5084319/ /pubmed/27793119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1123-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Varol, Nesrin
Dawson, Angela
Turkmani, Sabera
Hall, John J.
Nanayakkara, Susie
Jenkins, Greg
Homer, Caroline S. E.
McGeechan, Kevin
Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006–2012: a descriptive study
title Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006–2012: a descriptive study
title_full Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006–2012: a descriptive study
title_fullStr Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006–2012: a descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006–2012: a descriptive study
title_short Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006–2012: a descriptive study
title_sort obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an australian hospital, 2006–2012: a descriptive study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27793119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1123-5
work_keys_str_mv AT varolnesrin obstetricoutcomesforwomenwithfemalegenitalmutilationatanaustralianhospital20062012adescriptivestudy
AT dawsonangela obstetricoutcomesforwomenwithfemalegenitalmutilationatanaustralianhospital20062012adescriptivestudy
AT turkmanisabera obstetricoutcomesforwomenwithfemalegenitalmutilationatanaustralianhospital20062012adescriptivestudy
AT halljohnj obstetricoutcomesforwomenwithfemalegenitalmutilationatanaustralianhospital20062012adescriptivestudy
AT nanayakkarasusie obstetricoutcomesforwomenwithfemalegenitalmutilationatanaustralianhospital20062012adescriptivestudy
AT jenkinsgreg obstetricoutcomesforwomenwithfemalegenitalmutilationatanaustralianhospital20062012adescriptivestudy
AT homercarolinese obstetricoutcomesforwomenwithfemalegenitalmutilationatanaustralianhospital20062012adescriptivestudy
AT mcgeechankevin obstetricoutcomesforwomenwithfemalegenitalmutilationatanaustralianhospital20062012adescriptivestudy