Cargando…

High-dose intravenous selenium does not improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects. So far, several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that parenteral Se may improve clinical outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Since publication of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manzanares, William, Lemieux, Margot, Elke, Gunnar, Langlois, Pascal L., Bloos, Frank, Heyland, Daren K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27788688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1529-5
_version_ 1782463364201447424
author Manzanares, William
Lemieux, Margot
Elke, Gunnar
Langlois, Pascal L.
Bloos, Frank
Heyland, Daren K.
author_facet Manzanares, William
Lemieux, Margot
Elke, Gunnar
Langlois, Pascal L.
Bloos, Frank
Heyland, Daren K.
author_sort Manzanares, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects. So far, several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that parenteral Se may improve clinical outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Since publication of our previous systematic review and meta-analysis on antioxidants in the ICU, reports of several trials have been published, including the largest RCT on Se therapy. The purpose of the present systematic review was to update our previous data on intravenous (IV) Se in the critically ill. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included RCTs with parallel groups comparing parenteral Se as single or combined therapy with placebo. Potential trials were evaluated according to specific eligibility criteria, and two reviewers abstracted data from original trials in duplicate independently. Overall mortality was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes were infections, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, ventilator days, and new renal dysfunction. RESULTS: A total of 21 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. When the data from these trials were aggregated, IV Se had no effect on mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.98, 95 % CI 0.90–1.08, P = 0.72, heterogeneity I (2) = 0 %). In addition, when the results of ten trials in which researchers reported on infections were statistically aggregated, there was no significant treatment effect of parenteral Se (RR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.88–1.02, P = 0.15, I (2) = 0 %). There was no positive or negative effect of Se therapy on ICU and hospital LOS, renal function, or ventilator days. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, IV Se as monotherapy does not improve clinical outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1529-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5084353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50843532016-10-31 High-dose intravenous selenium does not improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis Manzanares, William Lemieux, Margot Elke, Gunnar Langlois, Pascal L. Bloos, Frank Heyland, Daren K. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects. So far, several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that parenteral Se may improve clinical outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Since publication of our previous systematic review and meta-analysis on antioxidants in the ICU, reports of several trials have been published, including the largest RCT on Se therapy. The purpose of the present systematic review was to update our previous data on intravenous (IV) Se in the critically ill. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included RCTs with parallel groups comparing parenteral Se as single or combined therapy with placebo. Potential trials were evaluated according to specific eligibility criteria, and two reviewers abstracted data from original trials in duplicate independently. Overall mortality was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes were infections, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, ventilator days, and new renal dysfunction. RESULTS: A total of 21 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. When the data from these trials were aggregated, IV Se had no effect on mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.98, 95 % CI 0.90–1.08, P = 0.72, heterogeneity I (2) = 0 %). In addition, when the results of ten trials in which researchers reported on infections were statistically aggregated, there was no significant treatment effect of parenteral Se (RR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.88–1.02, P = 0.15, I (2) = 0 %). There was no positive or negative effect of Se therapy on ICU and hospital LOS, renal function, or ventilator days. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, IV Se as monotherapy does not improve clinical outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1529-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5084353/ /pubmed/27788688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1529-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Manzanares, William
Lemieux, Margot
Elke, Gunnar
Langlois, Pascal L.
Bloos, Frank
Heyland, Daren K.
High-dose intravenous selenium does not improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title High-dose intravenous selenium does not improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full High-dose intravenous selenium does not improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr High-dose intravenous selenium does not improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed High-dose intravenous selenium does not improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short High-dose intravenous selenium does not improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort high-dose intravenous selenium does not improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27788688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1529-5
work_keys_str_mv AT manzanareswilliam highdoseintravenousseleniumdoesnotimproveclinicaloutcomesinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lemieuxmargot highdoseintravenousseleniumdoesnotimproveclinicaloutcomesinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elkegunnar highdoseintravenousseleniumdoesnotimproveclinicaloutcomesinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT langloispascall highdoseintravenousseleniumdoesnotimproveclinicaloutcomesinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bloosfrank highdoseintravenousseleniumdoesnotimproveclinicaloutcomesinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT heylanddarenk highdoseintravenousseleniumdoesnotimproveclinicaloutcomesinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis