Cargando…
The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigator-initiated trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel Luminor® paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting balloon (DEB) catheter (iVascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) in inhibiting restenosis and in ensuring long-term vascular patency. METHODS/DESIGN: This...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27793175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1657-x |
_version_ | 1782463376703619072 |
---|---|
author | Teichgräber, U. Aschenbach, R. Scheinert, D. Zeller, T. Brechtel, K. Thieme, M. Blessing, E. Treitl, M. Lichtenberg, M. von Flowtow, P. Vogel, B. Werk, M. Riambau, V. Wienke, A. Lehmann, T. Sixt, S. |
author_facet | Teichgräber, U. Aschenbach, R. Scheinert, D. Zeller, T. Brechtel, K. Thieme, M. Blessing, E. Treitl, M. Lichtenberg, M. von Flowtow, P. Vogel, B. Werk, M. Riambau, V. Wienke, A. Lehmann, T. Sixt, S. |
author_sort | Teichgräber, U. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigator-initiated trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel Luminor® paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting balloon (DEB) catheter (iVascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) in inhibiting restenosis and in ensuring long-term vascular patency. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the Luminor® paclitaxel-coated DEB catheter for stenotic or occlusive lesions (length ≤15 cm) in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and the popliteal artery (PA) up to the P1 segment compared to the noncoated, plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) catheter. In total 172 subjects will be treated with either the DEB catheter or the POBA catheter in 11 German study centers in a 1:1 randomization study design. The primary endpoint is late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints are patency rate, target lesion/vessel revascularization, quality of life (assessed with the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and the EQ-5D), change of Rutherford stage and ankle-brachial index, major and minor amputation rate at the index limb, number of dropouts and all-cause mortality. DISCUSSION: EffPac represents a randomized controlled trial that will provide evidence on the effectiveness of the Luminor® paclitaxel-coated DEB catheter for the reduction of restenosis compared to the POBA catheter for the SFA and the PA. The results of EffPac will allow direct comparison to other already-completed RCTs applying paclitaxel-coated DEBs from different manufacturers with different coating technologies in the same target vessel. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02540018, registered on 17 August 2015. Protocol version: CIP Version Final04, 11 February 2016. EUDAMED No: CIV-15-03-013204. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5084407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50844072016-10-31 The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Teichgräber, U. Aschenbach, R. Scheinert, D. Zeller, T. Brechtel, K. Thieme, M. Blessing, E. Treitl, M. Lichtenberg, M. von Flowtow, P. Vogel, B. Werk, M. Riambau, V. Wienke, A. Lehmann, T. Sixt, S. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigator-initiated trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel Luminor® paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting balloon (DEB) catheter (iVascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) in inhibiting restenosis and in ensuring long-term vascular patency. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the Luminor® paclitaxel-coated DEB catheter for stenotic or occlusive lesions (length ≤15 cm) in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and the popliteal artery (PA) up to the P1 segment compared to the noncoated, plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) catheter. In total 172 subjects will be treated with either the DEB catheter or the POBA catheter in 11 German study centers in a 1:1 randomization study design. The primary endpoint is late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints are patency rate, target lesion/vessel revascularization, quality of life (assessed with the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and the EQ-5D), change of Rutherford stage and ankle-brachial index, major and minor amputation rate at the index limb, number of dropouts and all-cause mortality. DISCUSSION: EffPac represents a randomized controlled trial that will provide evidence on the effectiveness of the Luminor® paclitaxel-coated DEB catheter for the reduction of restenosis compared to the POBA catheter for the SFA and the PA. The results of EffPac will allow direct comparison to other already-completed RCTs applying paclitaxel-coated DEBs from different manufacturers with different coating technologies in the same target vessel. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02540018, registered on 17 August 2015. Protocol version: CIP Version Final04, 11 February 2016. EUDAMED No: CIV-15-03-013204. BioMed Central 2016-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5084407/ /pubmed/27793175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1657-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Teichgräber, U. Aschenbach, R. Scheinert, D. Zeller, T. Brechtel, K. Thieme, M. Blessing, E. Treitl, M. Lichtenberg, M. von Flowtow, P. Vogel, B. Werk, M. Riambau, V. Wienke, A. Lehmann, T. Sixt, S. The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27793175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1657-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teichgraberu theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aschenbachr theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT scheinertd theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zellert theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brechtelk theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thiemem theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT blessinge theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT treitlm theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lichtenbergm theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vonflowtowp theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vogelb theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT werkm theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT riambauv theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wienkea theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lehmannt theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sixts theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT teichgraberu effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aschenbachr effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT scheinertd effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zellert effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brechtelk effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thiemem effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT blessinge effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT treitlm effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lichtenbergm effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vonflowtowp effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vogelb effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT werkm effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT riambauv effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wienkea effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lehmannt effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sixts effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |