Cargando…

The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigator-initiated trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel Luminor® paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting balloon (DEB) catheter (iVascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) in inhibiting restenosis and in ensuring long-term vascular patency. METHODS/DESIGN: This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teichgräber, U., Aschenbach, R., Scheinert, D., Zeller, T., Brechtel, K., Thieme, M., Blessing, E., Treitl, M., Lichtenberg, M., von Flowtow, P., Vogel, B., Werk, M., Riambau, V., Wienke, A., Lehmann, T., Sixt, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27793175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1657-x
_version_ 1782463376703619072
author Teichgräber, U.
Aschenbach, R.
Scheinert, D.
Zeller, T.
Brechtel, K.
Thieme, M.
Blessing, E.
Treitl, M.
Lichtenberg, M.
von Flowtow, P.
Vogel, B.
Werk, M.
Riambau, V.
Wienke, A.
Lehmann, T.
Sixt, S.
author_facet Teichgräber, U.
Aschenbach, R.
Scheinert, D.
Zeller, T.
Brechtel, K.
Thieme, M.
Blessing, E.
Treitl, M.
Lichtenberg, M.
von Flowtow, P.
Vogel, B.
Werk, M.
Riambau, V.
Wienke, A.
Lehmann, T.
Sixt, S.
author_sort Teichgräber, U.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigator-initiated trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel Luminor® paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting balloon (DEB) catheter (iVascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) in inhibiting restenosis and in ensuring long-term vascular patency. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the Luminor® paclitaxel-coated DEB catheter for stenotic or occlusive lesions (length ≤15 cm) in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and the popliteal artery (PA) up to the P1 segment compared to the noncoated, plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) catheter. In total 172 subjects will be treated with either the DEB catheter or the POBA catheter in 11 German study centers in a 1:1 randomization study design. The primary endpoint is late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints are patency rate, target lesion/vessel revascularization, quality of life (assessed with the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and the EQ-5D), change of Rutherford stage and ankle-brachial index, major and minor amputation rate at the index limb, number of dropouts and all-cause mortality. DISCUSSION: EffPac represents a randomized controlled trial that will provide evidence on the effectiveness of the Luminor® paclitaxel-coated DEB catheter for the reduction of restenosis compared to the POBA catheter for the SFA and the PA. The results of EffPac will allow direct comparison to other already-completed RCTs applying paclitaxel-coated DEBs from different manufacturers with different coating technologies in the same target vessel. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02540018, registered on 17 August 2015. Protocol version: CIP Version Final04, 11 February 2016. EUDAMED No: CIV-15-03-013204.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5084407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50844072016-10-31 The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Teichgräber, U. Aschenbach, R. Scheinert, D. Zeller, T. Brechtel, K. Thieme, M. Blessing, E. Treitl, M. Lichtenberg, M. von Flowtow, P. Vogel, B. Werk, M. Riambau, V. Wienke, A. Lehmann, T. Sixt, S. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigator-initiated trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel Luminor® paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting balloon (DEB) catheter (iVascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) in inhibiting restenosis and in ensuring long-term vascular patency. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the Luminor® paclitaxel-coated DEB catheter for stenotic or occlusive lesions (length ≤15 cm) in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and the popliteal artery (PA) up to the P1 segment compared to the noncoated, plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) catheter. In total 172 subjects will be treated with either the DEB catheter or the POBA catheter in 11 German study centers in a 1:1 randomization study design. The primary endpoint is late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints are patency rate, target lesion/vessel revascularization, quality of life (assessed with the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and the EQ-5D), change of Rutherford stage and ankle-brachial index, major and minor amputation rate at the index limb, number of dropouts and all-cause mortality. DISCUSSION: EffPac represents a randomized controlled trial that will provide evidence on the effectiveness of the Luminor® paclitaxel-coated DEB catheter for the reduction of restenosis compared to the POBA catheter for the SFA and the PA. The results of EffPac will allow direct comparison to other already-completed RCTs applying paclitaxel-coated DEBs from different manufacturers with different coating technologies in the same target vessel. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02540018, registered on 17 August 2015. Protocol version: CIP Version Final04, 11 February 2016. EUDAMED No: CIV-15-03-013204. BioMed Central 2016-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5084407/ /pubmed/27793175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1657-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Teichgräber, U.
Aschenbach, R.
Scheinert, D.
Zeller, T.
Brechtel, K.
Thieme, M.
Blessing, E.
Treitl, M.
Lichtenberg, M.
von Flowtow, P.
Vogel, B.
Werk, M.
Riambau, V.
Wienke, A.
Lehmann, T.
Sixt, S.
The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27793175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1657-x
work_keys_str_mv AT teichgraberu theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aschenbachr theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT scheinertd theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zellert theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brechtelk theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thiemem theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT blessinge theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT treitlm theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lichtenbergm theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vonflowtowp theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vogelb theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT werkm theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT riambauv theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wienkea theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lehmannt theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sixts theeffectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT teichgraberu effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aschenbachr effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT scheinertd effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zellert effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brechtelk effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thiemem effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT blessinge effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT treitlm effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lichtenbergm effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vonflowtowp effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vogelb effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT werkm effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT riambauv effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wienkea effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lehmannt effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sixts effectivenessofthepaclitaxelcoatedluminorballooncatheterversusanuncoatedballooncatheterinsuperficialfemoralandpoplitealarteriesinpreventingvesselrestenosisorreocclusionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial