Cargando…
Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting
BACKGROUND: Effective community-partnered and patient-centered outcomes research needs to address community priorities. However, optimal sampling methods to engage stakeholders from hard-to-reach, vulnerable communities to generate research priorities have not been identified. METHODS: In two simila...
Autores principales: | Valerio, Melissa A., Rodriguez, Natalia, Winkler, Paula, Lopez, Jaime, Dennison, Meagen, Liang, Yuanyuan, Turner, Barbara J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27793191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0242-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
“Hard-To-Reach” or Hardly Reaching? Critical Reflections on Engaging Diverse Residents From Low Socio-Economic Status Neighborhoods in Public Health Research
por: Aliyas, Zeinab, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Priority setting and cross-country learning: the relevance of TO-REACH for primary care
por: Groenewegen, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Identifying ‘hard-to-reach’ groups and strategies to engage them in biomedical research: perspectives from engagement practitioners in Southeast Asia
por: Nguyen Thanh, Ha, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparison of sampling methods for hard-to-reach francophone populations: yield and adequacy of advertisement and respondent-driven sampling
por: Ngwakongnwi, Emmanuel, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Cancer Screening in Hard-to-Reach Populations
por: Terry, Paul D.
Publicado: (2017)