Cargando…

Scaling and Accommodation of Jaw Adductor Muscles in Canidae

The masticatory apparatus amongst closely related carnivoran species raises intriguing questions about the interplay between allometry, function, and phylogeny in defining interspecific variations of cranial morphology. Here we describe the gross structure of the jaw adductor muscles of several spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penrose, Fay, Kemp, Graham J., Jeffery, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.23355
_version_ 1782463458535538688
author Penrose, Fay
Kemp, Graham J.
Jeffery, Nathan
author_facet Penrose, Fay
Kemp, Graham J.
Jeffery, Nathan
author_sort Penrose, Fay
collection PubMed
description The masticatory apparatus amongst closely related carnivoran species raises intriguing questions about the interplay between allometry, function, and phylogeny in defining interspecific variations of cranial morphology. Here we describe the gross structure of the jaw adductor muscles of several species of canid, and then examine how the muscles are scaled across the range of body sizes, phylogenies, and trophic groups. We also consider how the muscles are accommodated on the skull, and how this is influenced by differences of endocranial size. Data were collected for a suite of morphological metrics, including body mass, endocranial volume, and muscle masses and we used geometric morphometric shape analysis to reveal associated form changes. We find that all jaw adductor muscles scale isometrically against body mass, regardless of phylogeny or trophic group, but that endocranial volume scales with negative allometry against body mass. These findings suggest that head shape is partly influenced by the need to house isometrically scaling muscles on a neurocranium scaling with negative allometry. Principal component analysis suggests that skull shape changes, such as the relatively wide zygomatic arches and large sagittal crests seen in species with higher body masses, allow the skull to accommodate a relative enlargement of the jaw adductors compared with the endocranium. Anat Rec, 299:951–966, 2016. © 2016 The Authors The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5084800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50848002016-11-09 Scaling and Accommodation of Jaw Adductor Muscles in Canidae Penrose, Fay Kemp, Graham J. Jeffery, Nathan Anat Rec (Hoboken) Oral Biology The masticatory apparatus amongst closely related carnivoran species raises intriguing questions about the interplay between allometry, function, and phylogeny in defining interspecific variations of cranial morphology. Here we describe the gross structure of the jaw adductor muscles of several species of canid, and then examine how the muscles are scaled across the range of body sizes, phylogenies, and trophic groups. We also consider how the muscles are accommodated on the skull, and how this is influenced by differences of endocranial size. Data were collected for a suite of morphological metrics, including body mass, endocranial volume, and muscle masses and we used geometric morphometric shape analysis to reveal associated form changes. We find that all jaw adductor muscles scale isometrically against body mass, regardless of phylogeny or trophic group, but that endocranial volume scales with negative allometry against body mass. These findings suggest that head shape is partly influenced by the need to house isometrically scaling muscles on a neurocranium scaling with negative allometry. Principal component analysis suggests that skull shape changes, such as the relatively wide zygomatic arches and large sagittal crests seen in species with higher body masses, allow the skull to accommodate a relative enlargement of the jaw adductors compared with the endocranium. Anat Rec, 299:951–966, 2016. © 2016 The Authors The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-11 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5084800/ /pubmed/27103346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.23355 Text en © 2016 The Authors The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oral Biology
Penrose, Fay
Kemp, Graham J.
Jeffery, Nathan
Scaling and Accommodation of Jaw Adductor Muscles in Canidae
title Scaling and Accommodation of Jaw Adductor Muscles in Canidae
title_full Scaling and Accommodation of Jaw Adductor Muscles in Canidae
title_fullStr Scaling and Accommodation of Jaw Adductor Muscles in Canidae
title_full_unstemmed Scaling and Accommodation of Jaw Adductor Muscles in Canidae
title_short Scaling and Accommodation of Jaw Adductor Muscles in Canidae
title_sort scaling and accommodation of jaw adductor muscles in canidae
topic Oral Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.23355
work_keys_str_mv AT penrosefay scalingandaccommodationofjawadductormusclesincanidae
AT kempgrahamj scalingandaccommodationofjawadductormusclesincanidae
AT jefferynathan scalingandaccommodationofjawadductormusclesincanidae