Cargando…

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives

BACKGROUND: Multiple endoscopic surgical options exist to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), including holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). HoLEP alleviates obstructive prostatic tissue via enucleation, both bluntly with a resectoscope and by cutting tissue with the holmium lase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marien, Tracy, Kadihasanoglu, Mustafa, Miller, Nicole L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5085273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27800470
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S100245
_version_ 1782463540936835072
author Marien, Tracy
Kadihasanoglu, Mustafa
Miller, Nicole L
author_facet Marien, Tracy
Kadihasanoglu, Mustafa
Miller, Nicole L
author_sort Marien, Tracy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple endoscopic surgical options exist to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), including holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). HoLEP alleviates obstructive prostatic tissue via enucleation, both bluntly with a resectoscope and by cutting tissue with the holmium laser, and removal of adenoma via morcellation. This article reviews patient selection for HoLEP in order to optimize outcomes, costs, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: A literature review of all studies on HoLEP was conducted. Studies that focused on outcomes in regard to patient and procedural factors were closely reviewed and discussed. RESULTS: Various studies found that men with large or small prostates, on antithrombotic therapy, in urinary retention, with bladder hypocontractility, with prostate cancer, undergoing retreatment for BPH, or in need of concomitant surgery for bladder stones and other pathologies do well with HoLEP, as demonstrated by excellent functional and symptomatic outcomes as well as low complication rates. There is a 74–78% rate of retrograde ejaculation following HoLEP. Techniques to preserve ejaculatory function following enucleative techniques have not been able to demonstrate a significant improvement. CONCLUSION: Patient selection for HoLEP can include most men with bothersome BPH who have evidence of bladder outlet obstruction and are healthy enough to undergo surgery. The ability to safely perform concomitant surgery with HoLEP benefits the patient by sparing them an additional anesthetic and also decreases costs. Patients should be made aware of the risk of retrograde ejaculation following HoLEP and counseled on treatment alternatives if maintaining ejaculatory function is desired.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5085273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50852732016-10-31 Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives Marien, Tracy Kadihasanoglu, Mustafa Miller, Nicole L Res Rep Urol Review BACKGROUND: Multiple endoscopic surgical options exist to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), including holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). HoLEP alleviates obstructive prostatic tissue via enucleation, both bluntly with a resectoscope and by cutting tissue with the holmium laser, and removal of adenoma via morcellation. This article reviews patient selection for HoLEP in order to optimize outcomes, costs, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: A literature review of all studies on HoLEP was conducted. Studies that focused on outcomes in regard to patient and procedural factors were closely reviewed and discussed. RESULTS: Various studies found that men with large or small prostates, on antithrombotic therapy, in urinary retention, with bladder hypocontractility, with prostate cancer, undergoing retreatment for BPH, or in need of concomitant surgery for bladder stones and other pathologies do well with HoLEP, as demonstrated by excellent functional and symptomatic outcomes as well as low complication rates. There is a 74–78% rate of retrograde ejaculation following HoLEP. Techniques to preserve ejaculatory function following enucleative techniques have not been able to demonstrate a significant improvement. CONCLUSION: Patient selection for HoLEP can include most men with bothersome BPH who have evidence of bladder outlet obstruction and are healthy enough to undergo surgery. The ability to safely perform concomitant surgery with HoLEP benefits the patient by sparing them an additional anesthetic and also decreases costs. Patients should be made aware of the risk of retrograde ejaculation following HoLEP and counseled on treatment alternatives if maintaining ejaculatory function is desired. Dove Medical Press 2016-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5085273/ /pubmed/27800470 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S100245 Text en © 2016 Marien et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Marien, Tracy
Kadihasanoglu, Mustafa
Miller, Nicole L
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives
title Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives
title_full Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives
title_fullStr Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives
title_short Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives
title_sort holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5085273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27800470
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S100245
work_keys_str_mv AT marientracy holmiumlaserenucleationoftheprostatepatientselectionandperspectives
AT kadihasanoglumustafa holmiumlaserenucleationoftheprostatepatientselectionandperspectives
AT millernicolel holmiumlaserenucleationoftheprostatepatientselectionandperspectives